Jump to content

User talk:Mynameiseverymedia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bawaal (2023) (January 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mynameiseverymedia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bawaal (2023) (February 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Twinkle1990 (talk) 04:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Soundarya Sharma have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Soundarya Sharma, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alisshaa Ohri (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 18:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Siddharth Roy Kapur, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove sourced content. Have issues, discuss in the talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The citation link number 34 is negative, and we don't appreciate the fact that it has been added there. Other articles cited also prove the content. Best we could get it removed. Hope you understand. Thanks. Mynameiseverymedia (talk) 11:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia do not censor content, if sourced using reliable sources. The content you are trying to remove is supported by more than one source in the article itself. Know that the article belong to Wikipedia not a person. Also see WP:OWN, WP:COI. You seem to have a conflict of interest, something which is not entertained in Wikipedia. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Because it's sourced with more than one article, I have just asked to remove one source if that's okay, the other 2 can remain as is. Best we could get the 34 source removed. Thanks. Mynameiseverymedia (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Orissa Post is a notable newspaper and its parent publication Dharitri (newspaper) has been in operation since 1974. Unless it is deprecated as unreliable at WP:RSN, there is no reason to remove it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but the article is demeaning and the individual that the wikipedia page is about does not want it to be on the wikipedia page. Hence, best if you could help with this. Mynameiseverymedia (talk) 14:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, this article is a property of Wikipedia, not the subject of the article. See the policy WP:OWN, it clearly states - ":No one, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article (or any part of it). Even a subject of an article, be that a person or organization, does not own the article, nor has any right to dictate what the article may or may not say.", so we cannot remove content as per anybody's wishes. Secondly, I fail to see why this particular source is problematic? I would like to move this discussion to the article talk page. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bawaal (2023)

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ItsKhan Aman (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
  • Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Girth Summit (blether) 14:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]