User talk:Mykal lakim

Notability of Vampire: Undeath v.1

A tag has been placed on Vampire: Undeath v.1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 12:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Vampire: Undeath v.1

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Vampire: Undeath v.1 meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire: Undeath v.1. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third-party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. DES ^(talk) 16:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: G.A.M.E

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that G.A.M.E meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.A.M.E. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third-party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article.

Repost of G.A.M.E

This article was deleted as a repost; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.A.M.E. If you want a review of the deletion, go to Wikipedia:Deletion review. NawlinWiki 02:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vampire: Undeath v.1

A tag has been placed on Vampire: Undeath v.1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. скоморохъ 00:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dark Phoenix Publishing inc.

A tag has been placed on Dark Phoenix Publishing inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dark Phoenix Publishing has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 01:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dark Phoenix Publishing inc.

A tag has been placed on Dark Phoenix Publishing inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 02:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dark Phoenix Publishing inc.. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 02:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of ‎Adonis Bloodline

A tag has been placed on ‎Adonis Bloodline, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mifter (talk) 02:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Adonis (Vampire:Undeath)

A tag has been placed on Adonis (Vampire:Undeath), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 02:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Exalted (G.A.M.E)

A tag has been placed on Exalted (G.A.M.E) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 03:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

If you wish to contest the deletions of the articles, please go to WP:DRV. The articles were previously deleted in June 2007 through WP:AFD with an overwhelming consensus. Go to DRV and state why you think the articles should be restored. Please cite any relevant Wikipedia policies that may help your case. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes I did. The G.A.M.E article was deleted through WP:AFD. I doubt that the vampires in the role-playing game would be notable enough for an article when the game itself doesn't have an article. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't stalking your edits. I saw a number of your articles up for speedy deletion, so I deleted them. Also, I said WP:DRV was the appropriate place to ask for the article deletions to be overturned. However, as I told you before, we have notability guidelines. See WP:CORP for example. An article on Dark Phoenix Publishing needs to meet those notability guidelines to be included in this encyclopedia. As you stated, White Wolf is a much more notable gaming company and it meets our notability guidelines, so the company is suitable for an article on Wikipedia. That doesn't seem to be the case for Dark Phoenix Publishing and any of its games. In any case, please go to WP:DRV and state how your company and game meet WP:NOTABILITY guidelines. Nishkid64 (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

We have notability guidelines to determine what can and cannot be on the website. These guidelines are here for a reason - to prevent people from just posting whatever they want here. When an article is tagged for speedy deletion, it appears at CAT:CSD. Administrators can then look at the articles there and choose to delete them. That's all I did. There is no stalking going on. I advise you to read our notability guidelines, like WP:CORP for example. Judging from your comments on my talk page, it appears you still haven't read the guidelines. I would hope that if you do, then you will understand why your articles were deleted.

Articles on companies (like Dark Phoenix Publishing) need to meet those guidelines or else they will be deleted from Wikipedia. That's how we define notability. It's different than your definition of notability, but we have to draw the line somewhere to prevent people from posting articles on companies that they just created yesterday. Best, Nishkid64 (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

From WP:CORP: "A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Ultimately, and most importantly, all content must be attributable." The company, to my knowledge, has not been covered by independent reliable sources (reliable sources do not include blogs or forum posts). I already told you why your article was deleted. It did not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Articles must adhere to these guidelines. I told you that if you wish to contest the deletion of your articles, go to WP:DRV. The only person who would be considered a "superior" is Jimbo Wales, the founder of Wikipedia. You can find his contact details on his userpage. He will tell what I have been telling you this whole time. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, there is no discrimination here. We would love to have your article about your company on Wikipedia, but it has to meet WP:CORP. The article does not meet these guidelines. That's why the article was deleted. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page

Thank you for your recent message on my talk page. First, please be civil when leaving messages on talk pages; second as to the reasons for the deletion of the articles you have created, they do not meet the notability guidelines and see reason given by Nishkid64 above.--ukexpat (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Exalted.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Exalted.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Beurianlogo.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Beurianlogo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dark Phoenix Publishing inc.

A tag has been placed on Dark Phoenix Publishing inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drdisque (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Vampirecover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vampirecover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Mykal Lakim - To whom it may concern. P**S Off! I have tried to be fair about everything and I have done everything I can by the rules and people keep trying to delete my work. It's called, equal opportunity. Check into it before I sue.

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Vianello has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dark Phoenix Publishing, Inc.

I have nominated Dark Phoenix Publishing, Inc., an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Phoenix Publishing, Inc.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ... discospinster _talk 03:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Vampireundeathcover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vampireundeathcover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 02:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Darkphoenixlogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Darkphoenixlogo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 02:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Magecover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Magecover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Drklogo2010.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Drklogo2010.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 06:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -- Alexf^(talk) 12:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Barack Obama, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. You directly ignored an embedded comment, talk page consensus, and the FAQ on said talk page. Therefore your edit was reverted. Please discuss your intended changes on the article's talk page FIRST before carrying them out, otherwise any further attempts may also result in reverts and/or further action as per the three revert rule. Topperfalkon (talk) 18:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)