User talk:MycoMutant

Welcome!

Hello, MycoMutant! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ★ Ayaena Aya helps you 18:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucoagaricus badhamii has been accepted

Leucoagaricus badhamii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucocoprinus ianthinus has been accepted

Leucocoprinus ianthinus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 06:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peziza oliviae has been accepted

Peziza oliviae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucocoprinus straminellus has been accepted

Leucocoprinus straminellus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 18:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucocoprinus flavescens has been accepted

Leucocoprinus flavescens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucocoprinus brunneoluteus has been accepted

Leucocoprinus brunneoluteus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myrmecopterula has been accepted

Myrmecopterula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant

Thank you for creating Myrmecopterula.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. It was a lot of fun to research and I've still got more I need to add to it. MycoMutant (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myrmecopterula moniliformis has been accepted

Myrmecopterula moniliformis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 01:34, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radulomycetaceae has been accepted

Radulomycetaceae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucoagaricus barssii has been accepted

Leucoagaricus barssii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucoagaricus meleagris has been accepted

Leucoagaricus meleagris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myrmecopterula velohortorum has been accepted

Myrmecopterula velohortorum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myrmecopterula nudihortorum has been accepted

Myrmecopterula nudihortorum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:16, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Leucocoprinus species has been accepted

List of Leucocoprinus species, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 01:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leucoagaricus nympharum has been accepted

Leucoagaricus nympharum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radulotubus has been accepted

Radulotubus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 06:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phaeopterula has been accepted

Phaeopterula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 06:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant

Thank you for creating Leucocoprinus tropicus.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article about mushrooms!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lichens

Hi MycoMutant: Glad you're finding lichens interesting. ;) If you decide you'd like to learn more about them, feel free to join our (tiny) lichen task force! MeegsC (talk) 08:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contemplating it. I may be out of my depth on Lichens though so probably need to do some reading first. I'm finding this material far denser and harder to get through than I do with mushroom or fungi material. Then again throwing myself in like that does seem to be how I learn best. MycoMutant (talk) 11:44, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This journal article might be of interest. It's more about mushroom-producing ascomycetes, but he does mention lichens and the differentiation between bryophilous and muscicolous. Also lists several papers I'll try to find. MeegsC (talk) 14:09, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll take a look. Yeah I'm finding the term bryophilous used far more for mushroom producing fungi than for Lichens when searching for journals. I found that Lichens by Oliver Gilbert (2000) uses both terms to describe different lichen species so that might be helpful to read up on the behaviour of specific species to better gauge the meaning. It defines muscicolous as growing on moss but doesn't have bryophilous in the glossary.

For instance it describes Agonimia tristicula, Toninia lobulata and Strigula stigmatella var. alpestris as bryophilous.

And mentions some muscicolous variants of Caloplaca cerina and Caloplaca ammiospila. Endocarpon adscendens and Dermatocarpon luridum and perhaps a few others are called muscicolous. I think that might be a place to start to see if the terms are just interchangeable or have specific meaning. MycoMutant (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the paper I linked to, bryophilous is the more general term (i.e. found on bryophytes) while muscicolous is more specific (i.e. found on mosses) as is hepati(ci)colous (i.e. found on liverworts). That seems like a pretty clearcut difference. MeegsC (talk) 15:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would make a nice clear distinction with bryophilous being the broader description and muscicolous and hepati(ci)colous being subsets of it. There would be some logic in that. 'Hepaticicolous' doesn't turn up any results on Research Gate or JSTOR but 'hepaticolous' does so that seems to be the spelling which is used. I've not found the term used in any of the recent books on lichens I've looked at though. I'll try to look it into some more and see if definitions and accepted terms have changed since that 1997 paper and if the terminology used is different for ascomycetes broadly vs lichenized fungi specifically.

I'm finding some contradictions in the terminology used from source to source so I'll see if I can find a clear cut answer in something more recent specifically pertaining to lichens. Would be good to have one page for the generalised group with redirects to it for the subsets I think if we can confirm what the current lexicon is. MycoMutant (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google Scholar still shows plenty of recent papers using the term: [1]

Leucocoprinus Cretaceus

I would like to include a photo of a fungus found in Middle Tennessee on the Tennessee River. I have Leucocoprinus Cretaceus in my yard. It is not a tropical area of the United States of North America. However, we have been having tropical weather here. Everything I've read tells me it is a South American fungus of places like Peru (found this data here in Wikipedia). Shewstock (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great. You can upload it to wikimedia commons and I'll take a look if you like.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard

Many of the Leucocoprinus species are indeed tropical but have a widespread distribution all over the world now due to human introduction and during the Summer months when it is hot they seem to have no problems growing outside in some of these locations. Tennessee during the Summer certainly sounds warm and humid enough for them. The page for Leucocoprinus cretaceus may need some additional details added to reflect this but I've not got around to substantially adding to that page yet. MycoMutant (talk) 13:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shewstock Sorry I forgot to ping you in the previous comment in order for you to get notified of my reply. MycoMutant (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant. Thank you for your work on Leucocoprinus nanianae. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant. Thank you for your work on Leucocoprinus nigricans. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant. Thank you for your work on Leucocoprinus truncatus. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant. Thank you for your work on Pterula subulata. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MycoMutant. Thank you for your work on Volvanarius. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like your username

	Fungi collage
	As I said, I like your username. Here's a special wikiLove message created just for you. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I sort of just picked it at random whilst looking for a unique name to use on Reddit mushroom subs. MycoMutant (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margit Babos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Cystolepiota amazonica is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Leucocoprinus parvipileus is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

thank you for all the fungi articles jengod (talk) 04:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]