User talk:MyanmarBBQ

Hi MyanmarBBQ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fiona Curzon (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiona Curzon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fiona Curzon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Katie Bouman that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 17:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your conduct at the Phyllis Bolds AfD isn't exemplary, either [1] Stop making personal comments about other editors, especially based on your perception of their gender. I see that this has happened before. Acroterion (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hi bro. BBQ is my favorite food, too. Thank you for participating here. But we talk in a more formal or professional way here than how you have been talking. Saying things like "Holy shit!! Jealous bros should not cry each time a woman is part of an achievement." is too rude to other editors and not appropriate for this website. I generally agree with your meaning (that men should not be upset when a woman is recognized for an achievement), but it's not fair to accuse other editors of this just because you disagree with them about an article. We focus on the content of the article, not on the person you disagree with. Please stop insulting other editors by calling them things like "jealous bros"; if you don't, I am sure an administrator will eventually block this account. And that would suck :-( Thank you and happy editing! Leviv ich 00:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear bros Acroterion, Levivich, Thank you so much brother for notice me, But "Jealous" word is not rude, that is My opinion, Sorry for that! And i see Wikipedia have many negative-view editor base on personal feelings, there are only a few positive-view editor (I'm an optimism). It is not fair! PS. Levivich Thanks again for understanding me and you likes BBQ🍡🍢. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing other editors of holding a position out of jealousy is considered uncivil, and especially "crying about when a woman has an achivement" is accusing them of sexism which is very close to being a personal attack. It's understandable that some discussions can be heated, but you need to maintain civility - by Wikipedia's standards, not yours - to participate in them. (Also you generally shouldn't reply to every !vote in a discussion that disagrees with you as it can come across as attempting to bludgeon the argument.) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please sir my article is real and like reference but you why not show public please help me Monismansoori (talk) 10:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Monismansoori, Your editing skill and english is not well, article standard are very bad and unclear. So, i can't. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir Anadkhan24 (talk) 16:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hi, thank you for your welcome. But I'm actually new to Wikipedia, I'm doing an assignment of my uni which is writing an article on Wikipedia. I don't understand what does the "I hope you assume good faith this time and hope not as you did in previous year." means, because this is my first wikipedia account and it's my first time to write things there. :)Yigeiwoligiaogiao (talk) 06:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yigeiwoligiaogiao Hello, Sry for wrong sentence in my welcome letter! I'll help for your assignment (e.g fix, WP:Manual of style). Btw, are you Chinese?? or not? MyanmarBBQ (talk) 07:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am Chinese.;)Yigeiwoligiaogiao (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cool I love chinese from Myanmar ! <3 MyanmarBBQ (talk) 06:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yigeiwoligiaogiao hey... no needs to add refs for all televisions or films of Zhang Jiayi. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 14:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so just add refs about his important tv series? Or randomly choose some to add refs? Or just don't add any ref in the table? Thank you for your help.Yigeiwoligiaogiao (talk) 02:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Darren Wang, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MyanmarBBQ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that sockpuppetry was inappropriate and confirm that I won't do it again, and I will assume good faith to other editors. I have read the Wikipedia policies and guidelines including articles about living person, sockpuppetry and blocking policy. Now, I want to make productive and responsible contributions, and I want to get a second chance at editing. Please allow my sincere apology and please kindly lift the block. Thank you and god bless you

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You must make the request on your original account. Your blatant violations of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK show you should not be given a second chance at this time, as you were deliberately violating Wikipedia's policies. I'll note that on your original account. Yamla (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Should probably be noted in teh event of future unblock requests, they've now taken to egregious insults. Praxidicae (talk) 19:54, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]