User talk:My inbais

Welcome!

Hello, Avdhesh Palawat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fundamental rights in India have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. -- DaxServer (talk) 08:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir please tell me why Avdhesh Palawat (talk) 05:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. BangJan1999 20:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Avdhesh Palawat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Avdhesh Palawat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan1999 20:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't write about yourself

Please don't post excessive personal information about yourself or your family and friends anywhere on Wikipedia; I have removed the material due to privacy concerns. If you would like to learn about ways you can contribute to Wikipedia, please review the links I've provided in the welcome message above. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't write about yourself

Please don't post excessive personal information about yourself or your family and friends anywhere on Wikipedia; I have removed the material due to privacy concerns. If you would like to learn about ways you can contribute to Wikipedia, please review the links I've provided in the welcome message above. Thank you,

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avdhesh Palawat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Avdhesh Palawat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 22:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Avdhesh Palawat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sarrail (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neterion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neterion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Neterion

Hello, My inbais. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neterion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Please stop adding nextstates.com to external links sections of articles. You should read WP:EL, the guidance for appropriate external links. The site you are adding links to only began this year, and having read a number of its articles, it appears to be merely a sophisticated scraper (harvesting content from multiple sites and then clumsily rewording it into an "article") with embedded YouTube videos. None of those, by the way, are "documentaries", although you call them that in your edits. Useful external links are welcome; links to nextstates.com are not. Schazjmd (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I searched For each topic in Google news by title and found and only added the article recommended by Google at the top. I am not a expert at Wikipedia source editing i generally add links and references on trending topics Google suggested me this site multiple times so i directly search for news on this site, another thing that i liked about that it's easy to find crime news article there so i added that if you can recommend me any external or internal article me about adding links to Wikipedia then please recommend me.

But 😭 you stole 5 of my edits that took my 1 hr to search and add.😢 My inbais (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles don't need external links, and Google recommendations (search results) don't mean anything. Perhaps spend some time reading about what Wikipedia considers reliable sources. Schazjmd (talk) 23:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Streamstep

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Streamstep, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Streamstep

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Streamstep, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited StreamStep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acquisition. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello My inbais. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:My inbais. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=My inbais|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not

Who the hell will pay me for creating Wikipedia articles for dead, closed companies.I have created page for closed company, villages so there is no angle of profit possible. You are just going with your point of view regarding my edits. Please review your perspective about my account My inbais (talk) 09:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]