User talk:My dearest comma laurens

April 2017

Hello, I'm Mx. Granger. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Jennings' birthdate

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I want to apologize for my brusqueness in my revert messages: You're new, and I'm glad that you've joined us and decided to help!

Now, as for why I reverted this well-intended edit: The primary problem is that the tweet you cited doesn't say that it's her birthday; it says "Birthday girl 🎈" and has a picture of a young girl eating cake and wearing a birthday cap. True, it's a reasonable inference that she means herself, but, for all we know, she could be wishing her best friend a birthday. We are only rarely permitted to make inferences when writing articles. For details, see the policy on "original research". Second, even if the tweet could be cited for her birthday, it doesn't give her birth year. If you want to propose a different source (or try to persuade others that the tweet is permissible—I may be off base here), I strongly urge you to seek consensus on the article's talk page before adding it.

Also, regarding minor edits: please read the instructions (conveniently linked immediately next to the "minor edit" tick box) before you mark your edits as such. A minor edit is not synonymous with a small edit; rather, checking the box is your certification both that you haven't changed the page's meaning and that your edit isn't likely to be controversial. (There are some exceptions to this rule, such as reverting vandalism and correcting clear factual errors.) This edit was correctly marked as minor; this edit could have been marked as minor but wasn't; and this edit was wrongly marked as minor. It may seem like a small thing, but incorrectly asserting that a change is minor is seen by many editors as an attempt at deception.

Thank you for your time and patience, and I wish you the best. If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply here. If you want help with anything else, you're welcome to drop me a note on my talk page anytime. Rebb ing 03:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mike Faist concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mike Faist, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Faist

Hello, My dearest comma laurens. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Faist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:My dearest comma laurens/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:My dearest comma laurens/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My dearest comma laurens! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:My dearest comma laurens/sandbox

The page User:My dearest comma laurens/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spencer^T•C 04:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]