User talk:MyNameIsASDF

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mamma Mia! (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Preacher episodes into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Alex^TW 23:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Preacher ratings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Preacher ratings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --wooden superman 15:17, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parks and Recreation ratings

Template:Parks and Recreation ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Preacher ratings

Template:Preacher ratings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you recently removed content from Liar (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:46, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I know that you included an edit summary that says "It is a UK production", but that doesn't explain why you removed all mentioned of Sundance as the co-producer of the series, which is a verified and sourced fact. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:49, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MyNameIsASDF. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MyNameIsASDF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no affiliation with Xcx232 or any of he/she/their edits. If you are unhappy with some of my edits, take it here to my talk page to discuss it, but I am not behind that account or any of its activity. Hope this settles it. MyNameIsASDF (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address that you've both been editing from the same location and the same device. Yamla (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MyNameIsASDF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no affiliation with Xcx232 or any of he/she/their edits. If you are unhappy with some of my edits, take it here to my talk page to discuss it, but I am not behind that account or any of its activity. I've read that my edits to Split were reverted due to deleting citations. I was under the impression that WP:OVERKILL was part of the guideline, but it was actually an essay, so that was bad on my part. Sorry. I was never aware of Xcx232's activity until now and that they were starting to either replicate or follow the pages I edit. The only reason that I can see we were mistaken for being the same person is that we use the same IP range. Hope this settles it. MyNameIsASDF (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is more than enough technical and behavioural evidence that indicates you are the same person (much more than "we use the same IP range"). At this point your only real chance for an unblock would be to come clean and work towards fulfilling the standard offer. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Mission Impossible Fallout Soundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mission Impossible Fallout Soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chilling Adventures of Sabrina poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chilling Adventures of Sabrina poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coulson in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coulson in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Orientation title card.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Orientation title card.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Orientation title card.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Orientation title card.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Orientation title card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Orientation title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]