User talk:Musicworldvision

Musicworldvision, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Musicworldvision! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Tatupiplu'^talk 05:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm P,TO 19104. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Boney M. sold 150 million records? Has to be true because of receiving the Diamand record which stands for selling 150.000.000 pieces!! Musicworldvision (talk) 22:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Baby Do You Wanna Bump?

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Baby Do You Wanna Bump?. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Baby Do You Wanna Bump. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Baby Do You Wanna Bump. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It can be delete but the problems stays that people who search to Baby do you wanna bump with a ? will find nothing! I discovered myself that Baby do you wanna bump with a ? on the end leads to nothing because it was showed in red coloured letters. Musicworldvision (talk) 06:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boney M.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boney M.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Harout72 (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

selling figures are not easy to chose which is the real one. On Google for Boney M is to find 80 million like in the Wikipedia page. Also is 100 million to find.Also in a list with 150 million. In the German and Dutch page the 150 million pieces is mentioned. But filmed is on You Tube to see that Liz receives a Diamand record because of 150 million sellings. There are even lists who boycot Boney M.! It is up to you to let stand 80 million but clear is that you make it a fake page!!! Musicworldvision (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See You Tube Boney M. Liz Mitchell Diamands award Musicworldvision (talk) 00:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on My Cherie Amour (song). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't understand anything of it! Made only a link to Boney M.(in blue) which was mentioned as 1 of 3 mentioned covers. Didn't become blue....second attempt to make it blue....succeeded.. and than.....3.699 points were deleted without any action of me!!!!

Musicworldvision (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SanAnMan (talk) 04:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. SanAnMan (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 10:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Liz Mitchell, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

read.... Okay that you deleted the not proven words of Farian..."Liz not can be replaced"...my adding proved that Bobby is more poulair than Liz.... wikipedia info page from Liz and Bobby...shows how much readers they have...but the story is now already more okay by delating the not proven words by Farian. Musicworldvision (talk) 00:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to analyze various Wikipedia page statistics to conclude that one person is more popular than another. It would be a violation of WP:No original research. Only reporters, journalists and published writers can do that, by getting their analysis published in a reliable source. So please stop trying to figure it all out on your own. Wikipedia is intended to be a summary of published thought, not a platform for your new ideas. Binksternet (talk) 02:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunny (Bobby Hebb song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ooh Wee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]