User talk:Music01

Hello, Music01. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Good for You (song) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Ian Waithaka (talk) 16:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Music01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. This is the second time I'm requesting for the unblock, and I'm totally sure this host is not an open proxy. Music01 (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Firstly, between those two times you seem to have edited successfully, so it appears you're only sometimes affected by the IP block. You may want to figure out when that is, and whether that specific connection might indeed be via a proxy. Secondly, you again haven't told us the affected IP address, so there's nothing we can do about this block at this point. You can find the IP address via WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Huon (talk) 22:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hi, Music01. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the This Is What the Truth Feels Like page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do you realize that the earlier source is outdated? And that "Stone Cold" actually did impact on March 21, 2016, which explains why it's charting in the top 36 of the Mainstream Top 40? I'd really appreciate it if you stopped reverting my edits, thank you very much indeed. Give Your a Break 12:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But yet, your source is still outdated, because Republic Records (Lovato's label) confirmed that the song impacted on March 21, 2016 weeks after the originally-intended release date which was added to Mediabase. Therefore, I'd suggest you to not continue editing in a disruptive way anymore. Please make sure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines before you start editing again. Give Your

a Break 15:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Give Your a Break 15:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Give Your a Break 11:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My sources are archived too, they were archived more recently than your source (outdated) and the latest source I added explicitly mentioned March 21 as the date it was officially sent to CHR (yes, the date has been changed from April 5 to March 21, earlier release than was originally planned). AllAccess might be outdated as well, because they were not aware of this change. The radio release has been confirmed by both Republic and Gary Trust, who is Billboard's associate director of charts/radio and editor of Billboard's Chart Beat column. Please do not change the release date again. I check the Republic Playbook website on a daily basis and I can guarantee that on March 21/22 they also updated Stone Cold's page and said that it had already started impacting top 40 radio. Also, on March 22 I noticed on Mediabase's website that the song suddenly gained a lot of spins throughout March 21. Give Your

a Break 11:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Because of You (Kelly Clarkson song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UOL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Good for You (song) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Starboy (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Side to Side

Hello, I'm SomeoneNamedDerek. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Side to Side without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Music01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perfect Illusion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mixing, Bass and Kevin Parker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Problem (Ariana Grande song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shellback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bang Bang (Jessie J, Ariana Grande and Nicki Minaj song)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Sweet Talker (Jessie J album)

added a link pointing to Digital download

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Liar

Just letting you know, per your edit to Bad Liar, you don't need to add divides (|-) at the end of wikitables, as those are only to separate entries from each other. Ss 112 06:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Not Sorry (Demi Lovato song)

Hi, I recently noticed that not long after Hung Medien sites (including charts.org.nz) had updated, you changed the peaks on Sorry Not Sorry (Demi Lovato song) to single chart templates. It's not necessary while a song is moving up the chart to change it to a template, because when/if it achieves a new peak the next week, the single chart template will just need to be replaced by a manual entry with a reference anyway. If the song hasn't moved up for at least a week or two, then it's okay to change it. I try to go back and change these to templates myself. At least for the New Zealand chart, the URLs are archive links and permanent anyway, so week-to-week converting to the single chart template is not entirely necessary. Ss 112 05:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bankers Life Fieldhouse

I came here to leave a caution on your talk page about adding unsourced content, and I see that you are in fact an experienced editor with almost 11,000 edits. Bankers Life Fieldhouse has been on my watchlist for a short time, so your edit was one of the few I have seen on that article. I noticed you made a significant edit to the article, but did not add a source, so I deleted it. You reverted my edit with the edit summary "all the other upcoming shows are unsourced too, you can go on the arena's website and check it". This isn't how it works on Wikipedia, and as upsetting as that may be to some editors, these are the rules agreed to by a consensus of editors. Adding sources adds to the reliability of Wikipedia, and if readers need to check a website to assure an edit is reliable, there isn't much point having a Wikipedia article about the topic. Thank you for your understanding, and for your many edits. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Music01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Music01 (talk) 16:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; you forgot to tell us your IP address, so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 18:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Swish Swish

Hi. Please don't use semicolons to bold any longer; this is against WP:PSEUDOHEAD. Bold markup is preferred for screen readers as well. Thanks. Ss 112 17:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Havana (Camila Cabello song)

Although you did not say it was me, just so it's clear, I didn't change the wording from "second" to something that implied "lead" to begin with—that was Patricia CV, who wrote "the album's official single". I changed it to "the album's lead single" because "official" seemed intending to mean "first official single" here and I thought that's what they were trying to get at by changing it. I already knew it was originally confirmed as the second single, but I overlooked the following sentence where it was pointed out "Crying in the Club" was discarded. Ss 112 15:53, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I misunderstood what your edit was on Havana (Camila Cabello song). The wording "as a whole" was put there by another editor who, upon being reverted for removing Scotland, said "well if we're going to keep it, we should distinguish that we mean the UK as a whole" because they were evidently being quite sensitive about Scotland not being seen as a separate entity. I didn't care for it. I thought you were removing Scotland again, hence my summary. I don't know if that user will come back and make a bother about it again. Ss112 22:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ss112: No problem. I meant that "as a whole" was not needed, since the UK is made up of four countries and there are songs which go number 1 on Scotland but not on the UK Singles Chart and the other way around. Take "If I Were a Boy" by Beyoncé and "Born This Way" by Lady Gaga as an example, the first was number one on the UK Singles Chart but not on Scotland, while the latter was number one on Scotland but not on the UK Singles Chart. That's why I think it's not needed, at least I didn't see it on other articles. Music01 (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Music01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hey Hey

In future, if you are reverted, take it to the talk page per WP:BRD. You were reverted by myself and Cartoon network freak, and you still continued to restore the material. If someone has an issue with what you've added, it doesn't matter if you're convinced what you're adding is correct to do, the talk page is the place to open a discussion to seek consensus on whether your material should be the preferred version or not (WP:CONSENSUS). WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or "other single articles are like this" is not an argument that holds any weight on Wikipedia. Doesn't matter if the rest of Katy Perry's discography uses all the details. It doesn't make it correct. Ss112 13:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Weeknd - Reminder (Remix).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Weeknd - Reminder (Remix).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Seriously? Can you at least explain your reasoning? Use the talk page rather than just reverting next time. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Music01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts on 7 Rings

I made a formatting change on 7 Rings to use the {{tweet}} template and you undid it as part of an unrelated edit. I assumed this was an accident and restored the template. But you reverted my change again without any edit summary. Before reverting again, how about we discuss it on the article's talk page? In the future, please explain your reverts in the edit summary. Thanks. Colin M (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 7 Rings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Favorite Things (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reputation Stadium Tour Surprise Song Playlist

First of all, what do you mean by "she's always credited as he main songwriter"? If the credits of the album don't list her as the first songwriter, then she isn't the first songwriter, and that's that. Second of all, you removed the notes of what album each song is from without context. Please explain your edits, especially when removing 1,000+ bytes. And that isn't a minor edit, don't mark it as minor when you are removing a lot of information. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revival (Selena Gomez song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revival (Selena Gomez song), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revival (Selena Gomez song) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Weeknd - Reminder (Remix).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Weeknd - Reminder (Remix).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]