User talk:Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Kouhi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kouhi (talk) 20:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy at Seljuk Empire

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EdJohnston (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seljuk Empire is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBAA2

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Kouhi (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Seljuk Empire

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You have continued to revert (adding the modern Turkish name to the article) even after being warned about WP:3RR, and without any visible consensus in your favor at Talk:Seljuk Empire. You seem to be one of a steady stream of editors who want the Seljuk Empire to be as Turkish as possible. EdJohnston (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sockpuppet.

Hello, English Wikipedia users. I want tell somethings about problems. Selçuk Bey and I aren't same person and we aren't sockpuppets. In Turkish Wikipedia I spoke with Selçuk Bey and I think he is right about Turkish names. But I understood Modern Turkish names are very wrong because Seljuk Empire didn't use today's Turkish language. Maybe we did same edits but it isn't means we are sockpuppet. If you see User talks and my User contributions in Turkish Wikipedia you will see we aren't sockpuppet. If I can return to English Wikipedia. I promise I won't write Turkish names again. I understood my mistake. User:Rapsar knows I didn't want vandalism. I am bona fide. I am not bad person. See also User talk:Bbb23#Sockpuppet--Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu (talk) 19:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Murat_Güneş_Altuntaşoğlu, you should ask for unblock with Template:Unblock. Otherwise, English Wikipedia administrators wouldn't be notified about the message you wrote here. I hope your account become activated again. Feel free to notify me with Template:ping if I may be of any help. -- Kouhi (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, English Wikipedia users. I want tell somethings about problems. Selçuk Bey and I aren't same person and we aren't sockpuppets. In Turkish Wikipedia I spoke with Selçuk Bey and I think he is right about Turkish names. But I understood Modern Turkish names are very wrong because Seljuk Empire didn't use today's Turkish language. Maybe we did same edits but it isn't means we are sockpuppet. If you see User talks and my User contributions in Turkish Wikipedia you will see we aren't sockpuppet. If I can return to English Wikipedia. I promise I won't write Turkish names again. I understood my mistake. User:Rapsar knows I didn't want vandalism. I am bona fide. Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is technical evidence connecting this account to previous socks of User:Blahhhas. You will need to request an unblock from your original account. Huon (talk) 10:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But that's impossible because here is my original account and I'm not sockpuppet. Has User:Blahhhas technical evidence about me? Can I see this evidence? --Murat Güneş Altuntaşoğlu (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Blahhhas/Archive for the results of the checkuser investigation confirming that you are indeed in violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.