User talk:MuradAli2000

Welcome

Hello, MuradAli2000, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

MuradAli2000, good luck, and have fun. Packerfan386 (talk) 00:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Berkay Vardar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Berkay Vardar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia),especially for biographies of living persons. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961^Talk 18:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, JW 1961 I accidentally published it, now I corrected my mistake. Thank you for the tip.Could you please remove draft?

Rafael Fiziev

Hi, Pls note that your edit has been reverted as no heritage/ethnicity in the lead section but in the body text if you have source to support the claim. Cassiopeia talk 19:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rafael Fiziev. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 19:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nabi Mammedov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nabi Mammedov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabi Mammadov. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 19:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MuradAli2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My wikipedia account, which I created 4 months ago, was unjustifiably blocked and more than 9 articles I created were deleted. as my account was shown to be a puppet account of someone named Elshadiman. But this is nothing but slander. I don't know anybody named Elshadiman.I am a sports journalist and all of the articles I have created are about sports, football, athletes, sports events and have no advertising value, they all have encyclopedic value.You can review all my activities on Wikipedia, the articles I have created.I request you to remove my ban and, if possible, restore the articles I have created, otherwise I consider it a great disrespect to me as a Wikipedia author that all articles are suddenly deleted.I believe that you have carefully researched this and will make the right decision MuradAli2000 (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below, you are not being truthful. Go at least six months with no more edits, no more sockpuppetry, then apply under WP:SO. Even then, it'll be a high bar for you to clear. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MuradAli2000, as long as you keep creating sockpuppets, every article that you create will be deleted once it is discovered. You write about the same subjects with every sockpuppet so you're not difficult to detect. It's very unlikely that there is more than one editor who creates the same, identical articles, over and over again.

Your only hope of becoming a productive Wikipedia editor is to take Wikipedia:Standard offer...do not create any more sockpuppets and make an unblock request in six months, promising to abide by Wikipedia policies. If you are unblocked, it doesn't mean that substandard articles will be kept but at least you could freely edit without knowing that all of your articles will be automatically deleted. It's a waste of your time to continue to edit with sockpuppets as every article you create will be deleted as long as you keep doing the same thing again and again. And it makes no sense to pretend you haven't been socking, our Checkusers have information that proves that you have. Even if, for some reason, Elshadiman isn't your account, there are over a dozen other accounts that you have created and used. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Liz, I understand you, but I was unaware that the articles I created had been deleted before, I also did not know that re-creating deleted articles is prohibited. Just my colleague asked me to create these articles so I created them on my work computer.Isn't there an easier way to remove my ban? I will no longer create these articles

That's a complete lie as you specifically requested that the WP:SALTing of one of these articles be removed and even mentioned the previous deletions in your request. GPL93 (talk) 16:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GPL93,haha,congratulations. you've won a great detective award.What you show does not make me a liar.

User:GPL93,Instead of looking for errors with me, fix your own broken system first! The system you call checkblock user says that, my account is a puppet account of someone named "Elshadiman", but this is completely slander.

User:GPL93,I will file a complaint where necessary. You are showing accounts that have nothing to do with me as my puppet account. I will defend my own rights.