User talk:Mungo Kitsch/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

RETIRED

As of August 30, 2013 at 23:59 UTC, I am officially retired from Wikipedia. After six years, four months, 17 days, and over 27,000 non-deleted edits as of this post, I feel that the time to move onward is imminent, as I need to focus on other areas of my life, both personal and professional. I, as of this post, am currently experiencing a shift in priorities.

While I may consider returning to editing Wikipedia in the future, doing so is not on my mind right now, and is therefore uncertain. However, if I do any future editing, I will log on for such activities, and not edit anonymously. However, as far as I know, this is the end of my tenure here.

Many of the interactions with others I've had on Wikipedia are worth being proud of, and I am stepping down on my own terms and not in the midst of, or spurred by, drama. I am grateful to, and for, those who help other people on this website. It was a pleasure editing Wikipedia for this long, and even though I'm retiring, I still feel Wikipedia to be a great service to the world. I wish Wikipedia well for the present and future, as well as the editors who improve articles and/or facets of Wikipedia. Stay true, folks. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 23:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Castro (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''Theophilus Tagoe''', popularly known as '''Castro''', or "Castro de Destroyer" (ca. 1982, is a [[Ghanaian people|Ghanaian]] [[Hiplife]] artiste.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nerbeleth

The article Nerbeleth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BAND - no sources, no major chart, no major release, no prominence, etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MSJapan (talk) 23:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

deletions

Reminder: When nominating for speedy deletion, the edit summary must specifically indicate this. DGG ( talk ) 21:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WVRM

The article WVRM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines under WP:NALBUMS. Tagged for notability since March 2013.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 09:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sagovindars boning

The article Sagovindars boning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable recording

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sagovindars boning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagovindars boning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagovindars boning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ad Hoc Revolt

The article Ad Hoc Revolt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mungo Kitsch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mungo Kitsch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)