User talk:Multiverse

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!

Hello Multiverse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jokestress 15:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Powerpuff Girls Movie

Hi! You have mistakenly made an edit that said that the Powerpuff Girls were "quite popular" during the release of the movie. This is NOT true. The show was never quite popular and the only time it ever had any real moderate popularity was in the year 2000. The show had just a little popularity in 2002. Why else would it have flopped? Marcus2 21:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boing Boing

Thanks for your recent work on Boing Boing. Before you got here, there was an extensive debate about the article on this blog and its contributors. All additions to Wikipedia need to be verifiable statements published in reliable sources and conforming to neutral point of view. In addition, we need to avoid "weasel words" and give more specific examples. For instance, if you look at the article on Xeni Jardin, you will see how it has been changed from "some have criticized her" to specific examples.

These articles have evoked very strong responses from some people involved in editing the articles, and it is for some reason one of the most hotly debated series of articles I have been involved in editing. Be sure to be cool while working on reaching consensus for your proposed additions.

Some of these procedures can seem complicated or even frustrating for new editors, but they have developed over time to help keep articles improving. If you have any questions or comments on the "Response" section, please add them at Talk:Boing Boing. Thanks again for participating! Wikipedia can be a fun diversion, even on controversial articles, as long as you assume good faith and avoid personal attacks. Again, welcome! Jokestress 15:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Tomine

I like most of your additions to the article Adrian Tomine. Do you have sources to back up the many things you claim in what you added? Sparsefarce 16:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was mostly going by his Comics Journal interview, where this stuff is specifically addressed, although a lot of this stuff comes up in most modern interviews with Tomine. I'm going back in and adding the specific issue number. ````Mutliverse

Lexx

Hey... thanks for helping out with some of the Lexx episodes and everything. Just to let you know, I am currently writing summaries for the episodes and am trying to format them like the Little Blue Planet episode. I am just giving you a heads up. For the episodes that you had posted, I will try to incorporate your work into my summaries.

--DivineShadow218 06:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Powerpuff Girls Movie

Hello. I've never talked to you before. I'm quite ok with the Actresses going on strike thing and I know it's been years but I still care about the Powerpuff Girls. Yes, I agree that the show was somehow in the middle meaning that it is popular and not popular at the same time making it stable. The show was very popular for the cute characters and story and so on but the not popular part was of its terrible violence by what all the parents regarded so it should be balance like what you said. The violence part could be of course the fighting part and I don't know if there is any blood involved or strong languages. Tell you what, I'll go watch that Movie once again and I will go interview with other Fans out there including kids, teens and especially the adults and elders. Night Leon 06:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Guy Cihi

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Guy Cihi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Guy Cihi seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Guy Cihi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Like a bad zit"

Hi... I know it's been awhile since you added this, but I was wondering if you had a source for Gilbert's "bad zit" quote that you added here? I'd like to say where it came from—Google searches only show Wikipedia and mirrors. Thanks... —Chowbok ☠ 06:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Multiverse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Monica Horgan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Multiverse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Crumb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Crumb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Crumb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Schierbecker (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]