Jump to content

User talk:Mukesh Parpiani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My account Interscope has been blocked saying it is paid article. I wrote back that it was my corporate account however, they still kept the account blocked. I, thus created this new account for my father's wikipedia article (Mukesh Parpiani). I humbly request you to please review this article instead.
Kashish Parpiani (Mukesh Parpiani's Son) Mukesh Parpiani (talk) 06:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for volunteering this information, saves us having to investigate the matter.
That's not how things work. When your account is blocked, you don't just go ahead and set up a new account. The block is to you personally, not just to the blocked account.
I have accordingly blocked this account as well.
Also note that if in the future (assuming you get yourself unblocked) you plan to edit about your family members, your business, or anything else that you have an external relationship with, this creates a conflict of interest (COI) which must be disclosed first. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mukesh Parpiani! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mukesh Parpiani (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Appologises, the block is no longer necessary because I have understood what I have been blocked for and will not do it again, thus please unblock this account so I can make productive edits instead. I Kashish Parpiani is writing this article for my father and I have no vested commercial interest for the same. Humbly awaiting a favorable response Mukesh Parpiani (talk) 10:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid I can't give you a favorable response. You need to go back to your original account and request to be unblocked there, we don't unblock sock accounts. 331dot (talk) 13:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.