User talk:Mthennakoon

Deletion discussion about Kumaraya

Hello, Mthennakoon, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kumaraya, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumaraya.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystallizedcarbon: what is the reason to request to delete thus page. It's a a real book and people are interested in to read information about this Mthennakoon (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

Hello, not all real books should be included in our encyclopedia. Notability needs to be established for inclusion. Please read this two guidelines: WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystallizedcarbon:. yes i know. It a popular book and the author is a popular in the country. That's why i ask to keep it as it is Mthennakoon (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

In that case, please provide multiple reliable sources with in-depth coverage that are independent of the subject to help establish notability. Sales pages do not meet that criteria. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kumaraya. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this is a real book based wikipedia Mthennakoon (talk) 09:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asamajjathi Adaraya

The article Asamajjathi Adaraya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 08:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystallizedcarbon:. it's a popular book in the country and the author is a popular author and an activist in the country Mthennakoon (talk) 06:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

Same as before, please provide multiple reliable sources with in-depth coverage that are independent of the subject to help establish notability. Sales pages do not meet that criteria. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ilanga Kella

The article Ilanga Kella has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the requirements of WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystallizedcarbon:. this also a popular novel and the author of the page is popular. Hope to develop this page leasurely Mthennakoon (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

Same as before, please provide multiple reliable sources with in-depth coverage that are independent of the subject to help establish notability. Sales pages do not meet that criteria. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Kumaraya, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Ilanga Kella. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ilanga Kella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilanga Kella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilanga Kella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asamajjathi Adaraya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asamajjathi Adaraya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asamajjathi Adaraya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Asamajjathi Adaraya

added a link pointing to Sinhala

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tmbharathat, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Do not remove maintenance tags without addressing the underlying issues. Dan arndt (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystallizedcarbon:. all these complaints are baseless. This is a real person and people search things about this person. Then what is the wrong of he has a wikipedia. All these information are tru and accurate Mthennakoon (talk) 06:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

Why do you ping me? Please click on the blue links I sent you. There notability is explained. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 10:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whynare you propose to delete a wikipedia page of a country's well known person. I am disagree to this deletion proposal. And suggest me what are the things you are propose to verify or remove Mthennakoon (talk) 11:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA SOCK PUPPET...

Mr Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon.... We know that it is you and that you are making articles about yourself and your books...

First of all, It is clearly mentioned that A person must not write up an article about himself...It will be made by experienced wiki editors if the topic is popular and If it has reliable sources..

Second... According to Wikipedia it is wrong for one person to have more than one account, That is known as Sock puppetry ... I know that "Tmbharat" is your main account and that you made two more accounts, one is this one which is Mthennakoon and the sock puppet is Waruna XYZ....

Thirdly all th Articles you made have been nominated for deletion... Most probably all of them would be deleted by a week... මම යාපනයේ සිට පැමිණි දෙමළ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවක් .... ඔබ සිංහල ජනතාව ඉතා දීර් time කාලයක් තිස්සේ දෙමළ හින්දු භක්තිකයින්ට රිදවනවා .... ද්‍රවිඩයන් වන අපි සිංහල භාෂාව පැතිරවීමට ඉඩ නොදෙමු. අපි එය නවත්වන අතර දෙමළ පතුරුවන්නෙමු. ජේ ද්‍රවිඩම්. ජේ දෙමළ (~GANGA TRIVEDI~) GANGADEVI TRIVEDI (talk) 11:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

දෙමළ සිංහල ප්‍රශ්නයේදී මම ඉන්නේ බහුතර සිංහල ජනතාවගේ අදහසේ නෙවෙයි. ෆෙඩරල් තත්ත්වය හා ස්ථීර දේශපාලන විසදුමක් පිළිබඳ මම දැඩිව විශ්වාස කරනවා. මටත් සරණාගතයකු ලෙස රට හැර එන්න සිද්ධ වුණු කෙනෙක්. ඒ මේ දේවල් තරුණයකු ලෙස කතා කිරීම Mthennakoon (talk) 13:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ඔබේ පෞද්ගලික දේශපාලන අදහස් වෙනත් තැනක සාකච්ඡා කිරීමට මම තරයේ යෝජනා කරමි. මෙම විවාදය පැවැත්වීමට මෙය සංසදය නොවේ. Dan arndt (talk) 13:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Viceroy Special

Hello, Mthennakoon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Viceroy Special, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]