User talk:Mt7/archiv

A warm welcome from Bottesiηi

Hello, Mt7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up very shortly to answer your questions. Don't be afraid to ask!
If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I invite you to do so in my own personal sandbox (just follow the simple rules!) or in the Wikipedia sandbox.
When you contribute on talk pages or in other areas, it is important to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Again, welcome! — ßott e siηi ^(talk) 18:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak and Hungarian place names

Hi, Please use Slovak place names instead of Hungarian ones only if the place had a Slovak name at the time concerned, for historical faithfulness. For example, "Dolná Strehová" was probably called "Alsósztregova" when Imre Madách was born and died there, and to enable correct linking, you could use [[Dolná Strehová|Alsósztregova]]. This name use is in accordance with the official Wikipedia policy regarding disputed place names, see for example Talk:Gdansk/Vote. Thank you. Adam78 14:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Komárno

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. AmiDaniel (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zello report on WP:RFI

I'm not sure that counts as faking discussion, because as far as I can see the comments were actually made by the people. If I am mistaken in this could you please provide some specific examples. The diffs you provided only show comments made by you and Zello, and signed correctly as such. Petros471 18:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Figure Skating

Hello, Mt7! I noticed you created Opika von Méray Horváth. Good work! Perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Figure Skating. I'd love to see you there. :) --Fang Aili ^talk 13:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenští fotbalisté

Ahoj. No já vím, že Bratislava je na Slovensku :)), a že také byla chápána jako slovenský tým. Pro pořádek by tam však měla zůstat československá vlajka. Stejně jako v podobných situacích dáváme vlajku SSSR nebo Západního Německa. Díky za pochvalu! Mým velkým snem je vytvořit články a každém českém a slovenském fotbalistovi, který kdy na MS ve fotbale hrál. Někdy to bývá problém, protože někteří už nežijí a super statistika na www.fotbal.cz na to nebere ohled. Také někdy bývá problém zjistit jestli je daný člověk Čech nebo Slovák :)), třeba takový Štefan Čambal. Myslím, že je Slovák, ale celý život hrál snad jen za české týmy. Až na pár výjimek jsem založil všechny články o těch československých fotbalistech na MS a chtěl bych pokračovat i v budoucnu. Maj sa dobre. - Darwinek 09:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

s tou protizakonnou (vid. sk:Vlajka Česka) ceskou vlajkou mam ten problem, ze skoro vzdy je ceskoslovensko = cesko, u sovietskej zastavy je uplne jasne, ze je ina ako ruska a u nemcov je nemecko=zap.nemecko, podla mna je tiez dolezite spracovat futbalovu minulost(aj ine sporty), dolezitejsie nez sucasnost, o tej je dost materialu na internete --Mt7 12:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on October 29 2006 to Sándor Petőfi

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 3 hours. William M. Connolley 17:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: thank you

Hey, no problem! I'm always happy to help. It's nice to meet a friendly Slovak too... :) K. Lastochka 14:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Munich

Would you like to join WikiProject Munich? You can sign up here here. Kingjeff 18:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Hi, I believe you know that this kind of behavior is unacceptable here. I know you were not the one to start this and you are not notorious for doing it either, but I have warned the other party with the same template and I want to be fair, so here it goes:

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. K issL 09:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did only answer at personal attack. --Mt7 09:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian culture

Hi. I'm Lelkesa. You seem to be interested in Hungarian culture. Would you be interested in such a WikiProject? The quality of these articles seem to be very poor (eg. Hungarian literature), and many important articles are yet to be written. I made a WikiProject proposal and in case you're interested I would appreciate if you could add your name to the list of interested Wikipedians.

Thanks, Lelkesa 15:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiSk template

Hello,

I have recently founded a template which can be used on their user pages by those, who contribute to the Slovak Wikipedia as well. If you do and if you are interested, you can have a look at Template:User wikisk. Jan.Kamenicek 22:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Don't remove valid content from Wikipedia or you will be blocked. - Darwinek 23:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for 3RR violation on Tamás Priskin article. Enjoy your free time and think a little bit about yourself and coexistence with your neighbors. - Darwinek 23:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mt7, please be careful. You are bordering on 3RR again, and to continue a revert war immediately after coming back from a 3RR block is generally considered very poor behaviour. I'm quite critical of the way Darwinek blocked you, but that doesn't change the fact that your behaviour isn't looking very cooperative either. So please stop the reverts and instead take some time researching sources and discussing on talk. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked: You have now violated the 3RR limit on Koloman Gögh and have been blocked for a further 24 hours. There are ways of addressing a content dispute over the ethnicity of a subject, such as mediation, or even finding a source that describes his ethnicity and using that. (For example, if during his life he referred to himself as X, then that would be the best choice for the article, regardless of the personal feelings of any of the editors involved.) Edit warring is never an acceptable option. Thatcher131 13:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

he boy, i see you don't know rule 3RR. --Mt7 13:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time. An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period = four reverts . i did 3 reverts . we need a course for admins. [2] and this is not a revert. --Mt7 13:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the 3rv+1, and I've contacted Thatcher for clarification. Still, you were edit-warring, and continuing the same edit-war right after coming out of a block. Need a course for admins? Lesson two: "Editors may still be blocked even if they have not made more than three edits in any given 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive. [...] Many administrators give less leniency to users who have been blocked before, and may block such users for any edit warring, even if they do not exceed three reverts on a page in 24 hours." Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

key word disruptive - but if I try to force Wikipedia:Verifiability (V)(one of three content policies), that is never disruptive --Mt7 14:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your fourth edit was not a revert. However, as Future Perfect noted, you resumed the exact same edit war. You are certainly not entitled to continue the same edit war day after day as long as you only revert 3 times. I will reduce your block to 8 hours in consideration of the fact that although you were still edit warring, you avoided the fourth revert. I'd rather not see this come up again. As I noted there are several ways of settling the ethnicity of people, and edit warring is not one of them. Thatcher131 14:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks you. --Mt7 14:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration

Even though this dispute is only a few hours old, I feel Darwinek's responses, both on the RFC page and on the talk page, demonstrate that he lacks the judgement needed to be an administrator, at least regarding topics related to Czech nationalism and ethnicity. I have filed a request for arbitration; you may wish to comment there. Obviously, I do not endorse your conduct either. Edit warring is wrong even if one of your blocks was made inappropriately. Thatcher131 20:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Koloman Gögh

Hello, why did You reverted couple times Hungarian ethnic descent of footballer Koloman Gögh ? It was You, who mentioted this information on sk wiki (and I believed You :) Nice day. --kelovy 02:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Darwinek

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Darwinek. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Darwinek/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Darwinek/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 18:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

priskin, nemeth ...

And how about adding a "notverified" tag to all these footballers, as you did to Koloman Gogh article? - Darwinek 20:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editors should remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Attribution, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source.

All are soccerplayer, it is unpossible/very difficult to find any source, that they are hungarians in slovakia, you know very well, that this is a very difficult matter, you know surely a lot of people, who have a polish name, but they say I'm czech, german, eskimo ... you have simple remove information without sources, soccerplayer say a lot about game, arbiter, never about nationality, priskin could have mother russian/german, father polnish/austrian, who know without sources, but if you say Tamás Priskin (born 27 September 1986 in Komárno, Slovakia) is a footballer currently playing for Watford and Hungarian national team as a striker. is 100 % true with sources, all others only lie or half-truth or truth without sources (in wikipedia lie). --Mt7 21:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are just trying to whitewash their ethnicity because you know it is usually difficult to find sources about someone's nationality when the one is a minority in a country. You know very well they are all Hungarians born in Slovakia but including only the birth information give readers false impression all people born in Slovakia are Slovaks. Case with Priskin is mostly shameful for you, because he is so good he managed to play for the National team of another country being born in another, and still you continue to remove relevant categories. And YOU YOU YOU YOU don't cite sources either. No source they are ethnic Slovaks. - Darwinek 06:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR ruling - warning and page-ban

Please see here and abide by the ruling there. Newyorkbrad 20:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Darwinek

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Darwinek's administrative privileges are revoked. He may reapply at any time via the usual means (RfA) or by appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Darwinek is placed on standard civility parole for one year. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 15:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Czech chess championship

Of course, Czech (Bohemia and/or Bohemia and Moravia) and Chechoslovakia are two different national existence. Write accurately, what are you thinking about (chess championship?, chess player?, date?, etc.), please. Mibelz 6:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

please see soccer. --Mt7 08:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]