User talk:Mrsud
Welcome! I am a computer programmer
 | Sudhanshu is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
About Me
|
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of IBook21.com, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Itsmy. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 09:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
The article IBook21.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:WEBCRIT - no significant coverage from reliable third party sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SFK2 (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Ibook21.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ibook21.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of IBook21.com
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on IBook21.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 21:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring on List of social networking websites
[edit]Sorry, but we simply can't accept sites that don't have Wikipedia articles on List of social networking websites. If the iBook21 article keeps getting deleted, then that means that it isn't suitable for inclusion in the list. Also, you can't just keep adding the site back in, as that is edit warring, and will probably get you blocked. I'll leave a note about edit warring below. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of social networking websites. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, you are still edit warring on List of social networking websites. I count four reverts in 24 hours. Read WP:3RR, please. JoeSperrazza (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at IBook21.com, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. bonadea contributions talk 07:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
The article BinPy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 07:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Mrsud. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Question about possible conflict of interest
[edit]Hi, Mrsud. Please note that it's disruptive to keep recreating the deleted article IBook21.com, and also disruptive to edit war to add the same article to List of social networking websites. The article was deleted as advertising, but you seem very interested in having the article on Wikipedia, as well as having it named on the list article. May I ask if you have any connection with the IBook21 website? Or with BinPy, that you also created an article about recently (now deleted). Are you aware of the conflict of interest policy? Please read it. Bishonen | talk 20:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC).
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 20:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Cindy(talk) 20:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Binpy logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Binpy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Natalia Poklonskaya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please do not engage in edit warring, this is considered disruptive editing. If you have concerns, please voice them at the article talk page. Wikipedia works on community consensus, and you must discuss your edits. --benlisquareT•C•E 05:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
The file File:Ibook21.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 15:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
