User talk:Mrgoth
Welcome!
Hello, Mrgoth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Lexi Belle have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type {{helpme}}
on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Forward Unto Dawn 12:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm Milesandkilometrestogo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Riley Steele because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kagney Linn Karter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 12:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Mrgoth, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Mrgoth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Talkback
[edit]Message added 06:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 06:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 07:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Milesandkilometrestogo (talk) 07:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Picture of Daniela Denby-Ashe.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Daniela Denby-Ashe.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm Dismas. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Riley Steele, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dismas|(talk) 20:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hitler
[edit]Hi, Hitler's only notable profession was being a politician. He served only fairly briefly as a soldier, and was a famously unsuccessful artist. Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ivanvector (talk) 14:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring links to common terms into articles
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please see WP:OVERLINK Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lexi Belle. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)