User talk:Mrffcknt
August 2023
[edit]Please do not add information that does not conform to Wikipedia's policies as you have done more than once at Wikipedia:Teahouse in answers to other user's questions, repeatedly or intentionally doing so is considered disruptive. If you are not sure how a policy applies please familiarize yourself with the policy(WP:PG) BEFORE you give advice about it. Thank you.
– 2804:F14:80A4:9701:1D6:F010:8C78:AF6D (talk) 04:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- I see. I will avoid participating in discussions until I am more familiar with policies. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. Mrffcknt (talk) 10:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- That is very sensible. As an administrator here, I also came to warn you that your so-called 'advice' is not welcome at the Teahouse and appears as trolling. Is this your only account? You may be blocked if you use more than one account to cause trouble and give bad advice from one of them as you did here.
- I will be monitoring the future contributions from this account and will not hesitate to block it if I see a repeat of such behaviour. If you want to contribute constructively at the Teahouse, you must first learn more about our policies and guidelines. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 11:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tails Wx 04:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
August 2023
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.