User talk:MrSkylarMan

Welcome!

Hi MrSkylarMan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Ducal Family of Luxembourg

Hello and thank you for your contributions. I noticed a few problems with your edits which forced me to revert them. First of all, please avoid adding HRH or any honorific prefixes to the lead sections. That goes against our manual of style. You can look at the articles on the British royal family, which are great examples on how to set up the leading paragraph. Additionally, it is preferable to list mothers by their maiden names in the infobox, not by titles that they have received through marriage. Lastly and most importantly, I noticed that you had added various titles for each individual along with some paragraphs without attaching any sources. Note that anything that you add must have a secondary source independent of the subject, otherwise it might be challenged and removed as it's not verifiable. If you have any questions please feel free to let me know. Cheers! Keivan.f^Talk 03:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for your message. I'm new to Wikipedia and I didn't know about the HRH prefix not being permitted. The additional titles additional are verifiable from many certifiable sources. I had spent many hours, work and research on all the pages for all that work now to be erased. I wish I would have just been notified so that I could have made all the corrections.

No need to worry. You can revert any given edit once you have solid sources on hand. And by solid I mean reliable (and preferably) secondary sources, which does not include tabloids, blogs or forums (read WP:RELIABLE). Besides the titles, the info that you add to the body of the article also needs to be sourced. Once you have all sources ready, simply restore the info from an older version of the page. Keivan.f^Talk 04:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is there a way to save the last version that I had made as a draft that I can keep coming back to, to work on correcting, then only publish it at the end when it is completed? Thanks in advance for your help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luxembourg House has been accepted

Luxembourg House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]