User talk:MrSaturn33

Welcome!

Hello, MrSaturn33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mute Crimson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mephistophelian (talk) 17:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mute Crimson

The article Mute Crimson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance; no obvious notability; no reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mephistophelian (talk) 17:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mute Crimson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mute Crimson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mute Crimson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's an objective fact that the overwhelming majority of circumcised men were circumcised when they were an infant. Is your argument that newborn infants are choosing whether or not to be circumcised? You would say it was "neutral" to describe female genital mutilation as involuntary on the part of the infant girl that had her genitals cut. Why, then is it "biased" to say the same for men? MrSaturn33 (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elective surgery has a specific definition as used by the sources. My 'argument' is that you don't get to arbitrarily redefine based on your own opinion to make some kind of unsourced point. MrOllie (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It literally says "It is usually elective." This is a false statement, if you agree that most circumcisions happen to infants (an obvious uncontested fact) and you agree infants aren't choosing this to be done to them, than how is it a true claim that "it is usually elective?" It's not. You're the biased one who approves of infant male circumcision and then you tell me I'm the biased one for pointing out the fallaciousness of the statement. MrSaturn33 (talk) 01:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]