User talk:MrPinkingShears

Welcome!

Hi MrPinkingShears! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MrPinkingShears (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I have made any personal attacks against any editor, I apologize to them and to Wikipedia. That was not my intention. I assume this has to do with my remarks about 22spears's edits. I have not accused 22spears of being a pedophile nor have I implied that they are. My analysis of their edits is that 22spears is editing with a pro-pedophilia point of view. I stand by that analysis and invite other users to take a look at 22spears contributions and come to their own conclusions. What can I do to get unblocked? MrPinkingShears (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

There is a clear consensus from a number of editors, including numerous admins, both on your talk page and at the ANI thread, that you should be unblocked. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Given that 22spears is now indef blocked for apparent pro-pedophilia POV pushing), do you have any objections to an unblock here? – Joe (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was a bad block, and should be lifted asap. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The justification for this block isn't really clear to me either. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a genuine question to be raised at how quickly some administrators have been jumping to indef blocks when an escalation of warnings and smaller blocks would suffice. ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 14:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Wikipedia:Administrative action review is an option, but at least this particular issue seems to have been solved in less than 24h. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for bringing to light an unfortunate editing pattern despite a completely unfair kneejerk block Dronebogus (talk) 09:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]