User talk:MrAlanCD

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amanda Baggs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amanda Baggs was changed by MrAlanCD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879631 on 2016-02-23T17:08:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank pages, as you did to Amanda Baggs with this edit, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. ⁓ Hello 71 17:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:MrAlanCD

Please remove the text falsely claiming that you are a Wikipedia administrator. ⁓ Hello 71 17:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MrAlanCD, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MrAlanCD! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Johnson (YouTuber)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Johnson (YouTuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Johnson (YouTuber) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mike1901 (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits because...

Daniel Johnson is an unremarkable individual, and his article has a CSD tag on it. Thanks, --Ches (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMA Griz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 22:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Daniel Johnson (YouTuber). Mike1901 (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mike1901 - just a reminder that, if a user blanks a page nominated for CSD, you can tag it with "author requests deletion" - in fact, if he blanks the page again, I'll add the tag. Best, --Ches (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad - just realised he's a banned user, and he should not be editing at all. --Ches (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of IMA Griz (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. JohnCD (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]