User talk:Mr.weedle/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Mr.weedle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Your rollback request

Hi Mr.weedle, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 19:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you!

Janek02 (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your dedication in reverting vandalism and keeping wiki a better place. You deserve this... Yash t 101 08:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Admin review comment

Hi Mr.weedle, thanks for this. Hope rollback has been good! :) Best. Acalamari 09:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Lonley planet logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lonley planet logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. $The Haz talk$ 04:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mr.weedle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mr.weedle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please help with usability testing

Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform

For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)

Thank you,

NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 09:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Sea lion

Philophthalmus zalophi is indeed an eye worm, not a foot parasite. You can see that in the references that are already linked in the article. I'm not sure who wrote foot, but that was the vandalism, not the change back to eye. 2603:8081:2600:400:79FF:9782:4A1C:422 (talk) 14:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

So sorry, my bad here - sorry for the inconvenience Mr.weedle (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

KAUW airport

sure, use flywausau.com 2600:1700:B9F0:A310:A95C:ED95:E3DD:BF36 (talk) 23:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Can you update the airport page with that reference? Have an even better than expected day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:B9F0:A310:31BE:DF60:538C:C266 (talk) 20:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

News Reference Not Valid

Mortal Kombat Legends: Snow Blind, Please see this news reference because this is not valid Article source so I replaced this similar news reference of this article but I don't removed any necessary source. Josh Talk (talk) 04:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

There are multiple people requesting you to cease you disruptive edits on this wiki. You deleted several references with no context, you did not replace anything. You need to get used to editing Wikipedia in your Sandbox Wikipedia:About the sandbox Please stop your disruptive edits or you may be blocked. Mr.weedle (talk) 04:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Tricking Article

I revamped the history section on the page for Tricking, but forgot to add citations. You deleted my writing, but I don't have an extra save of it, could you put it back to what I had so I can just add my citations now instead of having to rewrite the whole thing? August 10th, 20:08 UTC

Sure thing - you can always do this via the history tab on the article btw! Mr.weedle (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Jefferson Davis County, MS

The information that I provide IS true. I have added to the Jefferson Davis County, MS article. I don't have time to lie. I am a very busy man. I do NOT make edits that are not real. Garren Isaac Smith IS a legitimate Subject. 2001:5B0:280D:BB2C:1D0B:69F7:CA8A:3E1 (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Regardless if it legitimate or true, it is a requirement of Wikipedia to ensure all content is verifiable and cited. Wikipedia:Citing_sources

"Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space."

Head over here to learn how to cite Help:Referencing_for_beginners.

If you continue to add unsourced content it will be deleted. Please read through these guides as to not waste you time. Mr.weedle (talk) 17:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

It's not that important. It's Wikipedia, afterall. Maltaur (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Vibrant Express

Regarding: Vibrant Express
Hi, I've added some additional sources to most of the changes I made. If you are referring to the bullet points in the "Technical features" section, it was there before I started editing. I did not write them but I am looking to try find sources for them and make it more readable. Durian Farmer (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you - appreciate you working to improve this article. Mr.weedle (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Chelsea Club World Cup

What exactly do you want a source for? That they're the current champions or that whether or not they can defend it depends on the format and timing of the competition? Rambo Apocalypse (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Regardless if it legitimate or true, it is a requirement of Wikipedia to ensure all content is verifiable and cited. Wikipedia:Citing_sources

"Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space."

Head over here to learn how to cite Help:Referencing_for_beginners.

Mr.weedle (talk) 01:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

So what do you want a source for? Why would anybody challenge that Chelsea are the current champions having won the 2021 edition or that whether or not they can defend it depends on the format of the competition? Rambo Apocalypse (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

From the article "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."

To look at it from another angle, what would you think if I added to the Spur's page that they were the current champions? Remember that not everyone is a football fan, and people come to the Wiki from all walks of life and could take what is written on any page for its face value. I for one have zero idea who the current champions are. Mr.weedle (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Alain de benoist

There must be thousands of authors who have written on the idea of progress. Why recommend this deeply inflammatory author and publication (the occidental quarterly)? It’s not something you would find in any other encyclopedia. 72.95.130.125 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Alas, just because you don't like this person, for whatever reason (I'm not passing judgment here), does not make it un-encyclopedic. Wikipedia has a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

What do you think the “Further Reading” section is for? How are we supposed to decide who gets included and who gets left out? This is a real question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.130.125 (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

There's a great article on this topic - please review. Wikipedia:Further_reading

FWIW, what triggered this revert is your edit summary, removing a line with calling the author a "Neo-Fascist" which in itself is not a NPOV and there was no discussion or description of -why- this should not be in further reading.

I wont revert your edit, but worth reading through. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

This article is certainly not reliable or balanced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.130.125 (talk) 01:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Marking edits as minor

Please make sure you don't tag edits as minor when they are not. Per WP:minor, it should only be used for clear language errors, formatting and obvious vandalism. For instance, [1], [2] and [3] are not minor edits. I see you're using Huggle to make these reverts. I don't have experience with Huggle, but the archives seem to provide guidance how to not mark reverts as minor. Femke (talk) 12:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Oh that’s super interesting, honestly this has never been brought to my attention. Looking at the archive you linked me it seems there’s no resolution here. Huggle uses revert and rollback internally - which per Wikimedia software, automatically marks things as minor. I rarely mark a change minor myself unless it’s a tiny change per WP:MINOR. I assume this is a widespread issue, I’ll do my best to resolve - however the rate of change and bad edits on the wiki is very high and it’s not always feasible to make manual edits, especially in times of elevated traffic.

I’ll try and get this to the attention of the Huggle team, would be useful to be able to select software rollback for some types of edit reasons. Mr.weedle (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks again for raising - I’ve gone ahead and started a discussion on the feedback page if you care to join in or put your vote behind the request it would be great. Mr.weedle (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Femke (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Adding game of thrones info to a song of ice and fire article

Hello,

I see you have recently added a lot of information about the HBO TV series, A Game of Thrones to the the article A List of Characters In A Song of Ice and Fire. The TV series is based on the books, but isnt the books. That is why we have a second article , Characters in A Game of Thrones. Please read the hat note on the Song of Ice and Fires character page before readding TV information to the book page. If you would like to keep this information, please add it to the page about the show. 2601:2C3:57F:3F8E:E86B:7FAE:1413:CC87 (talk) 03:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I haven't added any information at all. I could have reverted vandalism or mass unexplained content removal. Mr.weedle (talk) 03:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Take a look. I explained each removal with "Please see hat note at top, this page is about the book. The HBO series based on the books has its own character page"... Please double check. 2601:2C3:57F:3F8E:E86B:7FAE:1413:CC87 (talk) 03:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Fair pickup - apologies for the revert Mr.weedle (talk) 03:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

No problem, there are a few more corrections coming as a FYI in case it hits the radar again 2601:2C3:57F:3F8E:E86B:7FAE:1413:CC87 (talk) 03:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help. I got a bit sloppy. 107.127.46.42 (talk) 00:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Sergei Evglevski

https://www.olympedia.org/athletes/140823. Акутагава (talk) 01:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Not Neutral edit

I am an electrical engineer and I made some edits on the website of the electronic program of ENSEIRB-MATMECA, a french grande ecole. All I did was explain how the program is organised and the different areas that are covered, at least in the first year. I studied 6 months there and have friends who graduated there. I would like to know how my review wasn't neutral if the information is literally available on their website. By the way, what are your credentials in engineering to make your opinion more authorized than mine? I think we should always look for the information from verified sources, in this case the university website, instead of taking action under the effects of ignorance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.61.2.159 (talk) 02:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Apologies this message was meant to refer to your unsourced material, not in regards to a neutral point of view (the buttons are right next to each other). Whilst I appreciate that you attended this institution, your first hand experience unfortunately does not count as a source. Please review Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for what is considered as an appropriate source.

Side note: Please ensure you add talk page messages to the bottom of pages :) Mr.weedle (talk) 02:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Ted pearson

Hi mate, is there a way to make a new page for ted Pearson as I see you are reverting back to the other ted Pearson which is completely understandable. Sorry for this OnlyTommyyy (talk) 02:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Help:Your first article Mr.weedle (talk) 02:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	A token of appreciation for your efforts against vandalism. Thank you! XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 13:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Cioffi 2011

Hi, you added a sfn reference to Cioffi 2011 to Telephone here on 25 August, but the article doesn't have a sources section. Please could you change the reference to a template like cite book and add the missing details. TSventon (talk) 11:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Sure! Mr.weedle (talk) 16:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Done, thanks for the pickup Mr.weedle (talk) 00:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, if you use sfn references, I can recommend the script User:Svick/HarvErrors.js. It highlights sfn errors and is listed at Category:Harv and Sfn template errors. TSventon (talk) 12:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Weston

Weston has been found, it was actually found in the late 60s by a gentleman named James. I've spent the entire year researching and exploring the area of weston. We have found the old water tower, telegraph foundation, dump and lumber mill location about a 1/4 mile away. Wikiwonder67 (talk) 04:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

That's fine, however original research is not permitted on Wikipedia. Wikipedia:No original research.

Please look for reliable sources to add to your edits Wikipedia:Citing sources Mr.weedle (talk) 04:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Heinrich Schenker

Thank you for your kind email, but I am done with editing WP. I spent the entire afternoon adding to the Schenker article, but another editor has already reverted my additions, without giving a clear reason. Klimt1973 (talk) 05:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

I’m sorry to hear that, I know it can be frustrating. If there is no clear reason, you can always undo their action. Sometimes it best to discuss with the other author on their talk page, or the article talk page if there is a disagreement. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Canned Feud edit

Hi, I wasn’t exactly able to find a specific source for the recent edit for Canned Feud, however do IMDb reviews and its TVTropes entry count as reliable sources? Both sources noted stuff seen in the analysis. 00:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.16.37.216 (talk)

Take a look over here Wikipedia_talk:Citing_IMDb/Archive_1#IMDB_as_a_reliable_source for a good discussion on IMDB as a source.

Ok, so I guess IMDb doesn’t really count for reliable sourcing. Is this the same for the tv tropes entry of the cartoon too? 47.16.37.216 (talk) 00:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

TV Tropes is a tertiary source, please don't cite it. Take a look at whatever sources are cited in TV Tropes, validate, then cite those sources. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Looked over it again today, there was no citations on TV Tropes either. It’s pretty hard to find analysis articles about a 7 minute cartoon from 1951. The only other thing I can find were a few reviews from Letterboxd. I still don’t know if all these references are considered a consensus for the cartoon. 47.16.37.216 (talk) 08:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

errors

hey mr weedie thanks for correcting my errors Taip56 (talk) 05:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

If I made a change in content, it was an error. I attempted to change /update the picture of Nick Mullens to a Vikings uniform. I believe that attempt was unsuccessful. Supervisor4NCM (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

sources for ultraman

Hello, I have received your message on my editing of “Ultraman 1966”, here are some sources.https%3A%2F%2Fultra.fandom.com%2Fwiki%2FTohl_Narita&usg=AOvVaw3xnRusVoHUjOuVFMEjqq_p - Tohl Naritahttps%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FUltraseven&usg=AOvVaw2JRSV-tTrp5Uyh_5x9eBOc - Ultraseven I did have other sources but it was while back I looked into them, a year ago. Also I didn’t know how to cite the sources so if you can, please put the links of the sources into the text for me, please. Thank you for contacting me though, appreciate the hard work. Wikiman264 (talk) 07:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Tohl Narita | Ultraman Wiki | Fandom

Ultraseven - Wikipedia Wikiman264 (talk) 07:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Use the citation button in the edit window. It’s the one that looks like a big double quotation. There is a wizard that helps you correctly cite, just paste in the URL. Mr.weedle (talk) 14:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Wikiman264: Neither of those links are reliable sources. Fandom wikis, as well as Wikipedia itself, are never reliable sources, since they are user-generated content. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Mr.weedle. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 19:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Ferien (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Grand Lodge of India

Hello,

I updated the pages of the Grand Lodge of India with additional information regarding the websites of the 4 Regional Gran Lodges under its jurisdictions. The website addresses were provided in the edit for validation if any. However, regrettably all my edit has been deleted without checking the source which has been provided. The page is dated and does not provide any relevant information on the Grand Lodge of India of which I am a member, and my attempt was to bring more information in the Public domain on the same. Happy to understand your objections if any

Warm Regards

Chayan Pant Chayanpant (talk) 12:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

You did not place correct inline citations. I see only one source added, but a lot of external links which are not reference blocks. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners Mr.weedle (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Billa (2009 film)

There is a Hindi dubbed of Billa 2009. If you don't belive me, see this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgEbe30ilUQ

Also, thanks for the message. 2601:2C2:781:2660:CD74:A277:FA0D:835C (talk) 17:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

It's has nothing to do with if I believe you, you need to provide an inline citation. See Help:Referencing for beginners Mr.weedle (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Petko Staynov

Dear editor,

What was the point of removing my addition to the Petko Staynov page?

It's not a controversial claim which requires attribution.

By all means exert your power, but it's a petty and miserable approach to a modest contribution. 121.117.162.54 (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

You did not provide a source or citation and per Wikipedia:CHALLENGE has been removed. All contributions should be correctly sourced, using inline citations. See Help:Referencing for beginners; you are most welcome and encouraged to add the content back with citations. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Alba family edit

I edited the page for the Dutchess of Alba because my grandfather was her half brother. My father is Emilio Silvio Saria Alba de La Corona Spain. My grandfather, Emilio J Alba, was the child of an affair from their shared father, and left Spain at 14 years old and traveled to Cuba, My aunts and grandmother were born in Cuba, and my father was born in New York City after they left Cuba during the revolution. When my mother and father(second marriage) honeymooned when they married, they traveled with my grandmother and older brothers to Spain and stayed with our family in the castles, and we have the proud history of the coat of arms and artifacts passed through our family we cherish and have kept private and protected. We are the black sheep (so to speak) of this lineage. I wanted it to be openly shared as my aunts and father are in 70's and 80's and their history to be acknowledged. 2601:282:D00:8CD0:384F:B6F9:4AE2:4B64 (talk) 04:28, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Regardless, you need to provide a source. Please carefully review this article regarding conflict of interests Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Help:Referencing for beginners Mr.weedle (talk) 04:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

K-Meleon

Hello. Thanks for explaining your edit. The changes you reverted were in the lead and I've provided sources further down in the page, specifically throughout the development section.. The Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section which says, "Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material."

Let me know which part of the lead you feel needs a citation. I can then point a reference (or references) on the page to that section of the lead. Rjjiii (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

You're correct, this was my mistake. Thanks for picking it up. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

That was quick. It's no problem at all; thanks for keeping an eye out for vandalism. Rjjiii (talk) 06:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Contested PRODs

Hi - a quick reminder that if a PROD is contested for any reason other than obvious vandalism, it must not be replaced as you did here. I suggest you take the artcile to AFD instead. — Voice of Clam 05:46, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Done Thanks! I -completely- misread the PROD tag guidelines - appreciate the heads-up! Mr.weedle (talk) 05:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

George VI

Don't be so hasty with reverting--you are just making more work for us. Report, and leave it to us. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, how is it making more work? According to guidelines, including the exception to 3RR, state vandalism should be removed immediately. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Also this tone and abrupt post is hardly appropriate. Please be more thoughtful in your approach of users, as an Administrator it’s even more important. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Dave Price Racing

Hello, Mr.weedle,

Before tagging a page for having no context or no content, please check the page history. In this case, the page had just been "blanked" by an editor which is why it had no content. It didn't need deletion, it called for a revert of the page blanking. If the editor wanted this redirect deleted, they should nominate it at WP:RFD, not blank a page and then have the page be deleted by CSD for being blank. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Mr.weedle (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Liz Truss

I added a reference like you requested. Notwisconsin (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Appreciate your help. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

WVVH-CD

Why was my edit to WVVH-CD flipped back? I was just making the timeline more straight as the original one jumps into 2011 and then back down into 2007,which might confuse readers. Danubeball (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Apologies our vandalism software didn't show that it was moved. Feel free to revert, but the comment still stands, it really should have a source. If you can find one to add that would be great! Mr.weedle (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Edit on NLP Page

Thanks for explaining your edit I have added NLP Healthcare care use cases information with the citation, i hope this help reader to better understand about role of NLP in healthcare industry Amitsondagar (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Autocunnilingus

Sir, you removed my edit saying that pornography performer Annbarby Nika could do autocunnilingus for not providing a reliable source. (1) Porn websites are blocked by the self-declared non-censoring Wikipedia -- in this case, XVideos and Spankbang, so I cannot provide a direct link. (2) You should simply tag 'citation needed' to my edit or provide one source, rather than removing it entirely. People could easily verify my claim if they read it. If it is removed, people would be left with an wrong impression that this act was not reliably documented. (3) In order to verify it, just google it with keywords like 'Annbarby Nika lick own pussy' and you get ample results immediately. It's fine if you don't watch porn, but please don't divert and hide the truth. She has done it convincingly. It's an objective fact that deserves to be documented, even it is porn-related. Sofeshue (talk) 14:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok. So it's not my job to prove your claims, that onus rests on you. Please read Wikipedia:PROVEIT, and find an alternative source if the source you want is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Mr.weedle (talk) 18:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Permission

Hi! I'm the assistant of Dr. amina wadud. She asked me to update her profile on wikipedia. Akunbuamina (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry but that alone isn’t enough. You must use reliable sources, and you should be extremely careful to avoid conflicts of interest. Please read wp:refb and wp:conflict. Happy editing! Mr.weedle (talk) 04:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

My proof (not much)

I can't source it because I feel like a Spotify album isn't going to cut it. But https://open.spotify.com/album/7ncAyWge1gHlppBwT5s7Ls, https://open.spotify.com/album/1h7ImlzNzcZFI9H291lIkq. It's an album by Deporitaz uploaded in Spotify. Of course, not that proof. But it is still by Deporitaz, they're pretty much just midis made by Neil. (One of the midis is actually used as an instrumental in Neil's EP as Lemon Demon "Nature Tapes" in the song "Everybody Loves Raymond".) But it's fine if this is not enough proof, because it IS not enough proof. That's pretty much all, and it's fine if it still doesn't get added. JJAM25 (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Explanation for cold injury edit

Hello, Mr.weedle. I apologize for not messaging you beforehand about editing your article stub. I've created a full article on cold injury as part of a wikipedia student course to expand the information on this topic. As part of making this updated version live, I briefly removed your initial stub and inserted my article. I've reverted the page back to the stub for now so that I can troubleshoot an issue when moving the content. That being said, I'm planning on replacing the current stub information and re-uploading the full article shortly. Hopefully this clarifies things for you. Drchancer (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

No problem, it's not my article btw, no one owns articles here either :). In future, it's best to always include a detailed edit summary explaining exactly what you are doing and why. Mass deletion of content is flagged as vandalism, and without context, it's usually reverted quickly. Mr.weedle (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Good to know, thanks! I've gone ahead with transferring the updated article into live wikipedia, and included a more detailed explanation about the reasoning for the edit. Drchancer (talk) 22:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Hayley Woo

Hi, please kindly remove the conflict you've caused for my own Wiki page. Thanks. 121.7.90.212 (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

None of the content is sourced sorry. It's up to you, the author, to provide encyclopedic content that is backed by credible sources Wikipedia:ProveIt, I've left a note on your talk page on this with a beginners guide to how to reference Help:Referencing for beginners. If this is your own page, Wikipedia strong discourages writing about yourself Wikipedia:Autobiography Mr.weedle (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Antón_Guijarro#Personal_life

https://www.facebook.com/david.antonguijarro

Marriage. Editor Nicolas (talk) 04:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Be careful with Facebook as a source, I'd recommend you find a better one. Especially as the personal section is not public on their page, it's not possible to verify. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:54, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit on Doraemon (1979 TV series)

I just wanted to fix a mistake: the image is displayed twice, both with the same caption and on different sections (summary and Cast), i.e. duplicate. So, I removed it from the former secrion and kept it in the latter, as if it's more appropriate for the latter. DimaLeon2000 TALK CONTRIB 01:31, November 23, 2022

No problem! Mr.weedle (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Can you please revert your revert? DimaLeon2000 TALK CONTRIB 09:52, November 23, 2022

You can do this from the page history tab.Mr.weedle (talk) 05:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

In 2021, Colin Powell received the Gerald R. Ford Medal for Distinguished Public Service from the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation.

[[4]]. Aureus denarius (talk) 05:48, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Great, please redo your edit and add this source. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:51, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great work! Keep it up! — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Oak Island mystery

" Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oak Island mystery, but you didn't provide a source. " I indeed think that this is an error. You're asking for a source while it's more than common knowledge in France (well, this is the most famous robbery of the last 2000 years in France. it's like asking "can you provide a source demonstrating that Lincoln has been assassinated". That's just weird. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.254.206.5 (talk) 20:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia - assuming everyone knows something just because you do is not appropriate. Mr.weedle (talk) 20:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Help with bio update?

Hi, I see you are a member of Wikiprojects Telecommunications. I’ve made some proposals to update the article about Walter De Brouwer, posted here Talk:Walter De Brouwer#Requested edits December 2022. I have a conflict of interest, so I am refraining from direct edits of the article. Could you possibly look at the proposals? Sincere thanks, Supereditor1991 (talk) 17:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

I think the proposal is solid, appreciate you checking in. Feel free to add the edits. I've left a note on the article talk page too. Mr.weedle (talk) 23:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Asking a question

Hello, Mr.weedle. I wanted to ask you on how to reference a Facebook post for a quote in an article. I would be very grateful for your assistance.

I apologize for the disturbance.

Thank you in advance. Anenome J. Jones (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed response. Check out Wikipedia:FACEBOOK and Wikipedia:SPS for some good guidance on this topic. Thanks! Mr.weedle (talk) 23:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Article deletion on Nautilus Minerals

I've written what I think is a well-researched and structure article on nautilus minerals that is awaiting peer-review in my sandbox. I have linked to it here - User:Naeim9146/Nautilus Minerals. Is there anyway I could delete the original article (which is a stub and badly written) and replace it with mine?

Thanks

It would be greatly appreciated if you could review my article. Naeim9146 (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Re-Revert at Kingdom of England

I think you may have reverted me in error? I was not adding unsourced content, I was restoring content that had been removed by an anonymous user on seemingly spurious grounds. I checked the content (English defeat of the Spanish Armada) on the page Spanish Armada and it appeared relevant and accurate. Largely Legible Layman (talk) 02:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Apologies - our vandal tools didn't show that this was a summary of a larger article. I've restored your edits - sorry for the hassle! Mr.weedle (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Barry Lyndon

Just let you know I added the sources, please let me know if there is anything wrong 2601:600:807F:C00:7086:824:7648:6144 (talk) 03:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Pontius Pilate invented Pilates

John 4:8: "Pontius Pilate, invented an exercise system to cure Roman obesity under order of the LORD" Pontius Pilates 2023 (talk) 03:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Add it to the article please, all edits require a valid source. Mr.weedle (talk) 03:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Qaba

Hi, I'm leaving a message here as well per your request, but I did include a source in my edits. Yedida Stillman, Arab Dress. I had to edit in piecemeal today which isn't my preference, and had to step away after my most recent edits which is why you may have missed said source. ISBN for the book is 9781417551880. Additionally there's no need to delete the gallery edits, and the inclusion of Jama and Terlig I justified as pre-existing content of the page mentions the Jama, and the Terlig page mentions its connection to the Jama and Persian Qaba, a connection further touched on in the content I added. Sartorialegypt (talk) 05:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

An award for you!

		CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
		For your recent efforts fighting vandalism, I hereby present you with this award 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 03:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Very kind of you! Thank you! Mr.weedle (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

You message at my talk page; Green wall

Hi, Mr.weedle. I have replied to the message you posted on my talk page. Please check. — Preceding undated comment added 13:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Weedle

I would wish to publish my article here + my short biography about me, which steps should I take Mr Weedle w Namunswa Alma D (talk) 10:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Please read this Wikipedia:Autobiography - generally discouraged to write about yourself. Mr.weedle (talk) 18:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)