User talk:Mr.bonus

Mr Bonus, Can you please say what is wrong with my page? I see that you marked it for correction, but i dont kow how to fix it. Can you please help?

thank you

Chantel Shafie

- How can I believe this is actually you, Chantel? Is there a way to prove it isn't just an enraged fan that's masquerading as you? Mr.bonus 02:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr Bonus, please email me on contact@chantelshafie.com. many thanks. chantel shafie

- The thing that is wrong with the article is that most of it reads more like a story than an encyclopaedia article - ie: rather than "After appearing in films such as Batman Begins, James Bond Die Another Day, Shanghai Knights and Footballers' Wives, she turned her hand to television presenting, where she now resides.", it should be something more like "Chantel worked as an extra in Batman Begins, Die Another Day, Shanghai Knights and Footballers' Wives. She later went into presenting and can be seen on channel.............". Read a few bio sections on other celerity articles and see how it is done on those if you are still unsure. Major celebrity pages are always being edited so the final article should be how it should be done. Mr.bonus 13:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Play The Game

Hi there. I thought you might be interested to know that I've done my best to write a new Ultimate Play The Game article, including all the available info on the Stampers' early work. To be honest not much more than I could tell you before, but it's in context with the rest now at least. Cheers. Miremare 03:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Alan Coxon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alan Coxon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M. Bison

I didn't know you moved several of the Street Fighter characters to their common name. Should M. Bison be moved to Bison (Street Fighter) in accord to this? Lord Sesshomaru 01:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BIG Game TV.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BIG Game TV.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 17:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Simeon Courtie

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Simeon Courtie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Simeon Courtie seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Simeon Courtie, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 02:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The mint logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The mint logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Crazy_Taxi_3_cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Crazy_Taxi_3_cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphim ^Whipp 12:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Speed auction.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Speed auction.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The mint tv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The mint tv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M. Bison (revisited)

Regarding this old reply, been meaning to say, I didn't quite understand it. Example, is not "Ken" a shortened name of "Ken Masters"? Please clarify it on your talk page, as I'm watching it. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Porter

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cat Porter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cat Porter. Fritzpoll (talk) 09:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Outrun2 F50.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Outrun2 F50.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Masters and Sakura Kasugano, and warning about behavior

I moved these pages back because another debate occured in which it agreed that these names should be used since they appear in game. While I'm not married to this convention, your apparent move warring over the issue is not appreciated. However, why you weren't banned or at least warned for this edit is anyone's guess. I hope you will be more civil in this debate. JuJube (talk) 17:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You know very well that the debate did not end in clear consensus, since you were doing a great deal of the arguing. Forcing this to go into another rehash of the MedCab from a year ago will not have pleasant results for all involved. JuJube (talk) 00:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The daily quiz.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The daily quiz.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mr.bonus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 338 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Peter Simon (presenter) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Crazy Taxi 2 cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Crazy Taxi 2 cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Crazy Taxi cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Crazy Taxi cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazy Taxi cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Taxi cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cat Porter for deletion

The article Cat Porter is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Porter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Stevens (presenter)

The article Craig Stevens (presenter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to have coverage in RS, only source for years has been imdb. Finding very little on my own.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Simon (presenter)

The article Peter Simon (presenter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]