User talk:Mr. Guye/Archive 15

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amit Kleinberger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support

	Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Brianhe RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christiane Woopen

Hello, Mr. Guye. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

soon.

Doubledoc (talk) 12:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Review

Hi! Thank you very much for your review on my article, I'm sorry for including terminology that was not impartial. I already removed those terms for the article to be neutral. If you like you can check it out again I would appreciate it. Thank You again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaafNahlot (talk • contribs) 03:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 12:19:28, 9 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Yogeshhkulkarni

Yogeshhkulkarni (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Midsurface (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please suggest more specifically what needs to be changed. Maybe, one or two examples in the same article will give me a better idea.

Yogeshhkulkarni (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UAA Talk

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Usernames_for_administrator_attention#Removal_of_pending_report_and_re-reporting_of_redundant_reports.3F regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hi Mr. Guye, this is likely not about you but I thought you might be interested. Horseless Headman (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Tyler Adkison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyler Adkison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Adkison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Women in government page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please adopt me?

Dear Mr Guye-

I feel as though I have been ejected from Titanic and him desperately looking for some flotsam to hold onto.

This is my first attempt at publishing a wiki article. It has gotten more and more convoluted since I started several weeks ago.

I have read all of the guidelines/do's and don'ts/God help you if we catchya's...

Would you please adopt me? I am a very bright intelligent person, a professional writer, self-described a grammar Nazi and vocabulary strumpet. It's just I am tripping myself up on very basic editing efforts that should not in any way be taking me this long for this much effort to figure out. I am frustrated with the tutorials because they seem to endlessly link to other pages. Trying to avoid source editing and keep it basic and simple.

My situation-I was asked to rewrite and update an existing wiki entry. A couple of weeks ago I did. Now I have been asked to add several pictures and expand upon a couple of sections. Somehow, I messed up the source editing, and the article was all catty wompus dis-formatted. a user, via the help desk, assisted me in restoring the article; however it was restored to the original addition, which existed before I joined the project.

Now I am terrified to do anything because I am afraid I will throw the current article into a similar state of disarray. I think I can test edit the article somewhere... my sandbox? so much of the wiki terminology is foreign to me and I am getting frustrated because I can usually grasp a better than average understanding of a program.

My goals are pretty simple for this article; while technically it is my first wiki article, I have a well-written, unbiased, non-advertisement article ready to go. Could you please, pretty please, help me achieve that?

Most sincerely, Kimber O. username: kkimbero wiki article URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMACK

Kkimbero (talk) 03:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kkimbero: Well, firstly thank you for asking for help. But I completely forgot that my name was still there as an adopter. I personally don't feel as if I have the experience to be an adopter (sorry). You can ask another adopter at WP:ADOPTERS. However, I will provide you with some links to Wikipedia help pages. I will post them on your talk page.

Thanks, --Mr. Guye (talk) 03:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kkimbero: Actually, it seems someone else has already posted those links. Also, I've noticed your edits are all in Visual edit. If you are uncomfortable with that, you may want to edit in source mode (click "Edit source" at the top of the page). That is the one I personally am more comfortable with, but maybe it is because I am used to it. I also noticed that you occasionally add "nowiki" markup when you edit. That removes wiki formatting (like from United States to [[United States]]). I would avoid it if you are new.--Mr. Guye (talk) 03:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ella Fitzgerald

Ella Fitzgerald is not even close to being GA standard. It requires a lot of work. Please could you withdraw the nomination? Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gareth E. Kegg: I am not withdrawing my nomination. I believe it is qualified for the GA status.--Mr. Guye (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the author of the vast majority of the text of the article and I am aware that it is missing so much biographical information, critical, cultural, and musical analysis and references. If you could let us work on the article for a few weeks, it would stand a much better chance of GA. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gareth E. Kegg: Ok. I'm satisfied with your answer. I'll withdraw. --Mr. Guye (talk) 18:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Withdrawn. --Mr. Guye (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kasey Campbell

Re: Kasey Campbell: Pussycat Dolls There is mention of Kasey Campbell on the "Pussycat Dolls" Wikipedia page. If you google search Kasey Campbell you can find that information. Alongside IMDB. The redirect is legitimate. Check facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.67.67.87 (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@50.67.67.87: Sorry for the mistake.--Mr. Guye (talk) 22:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:William Yang

Hi Mr. Guye,
I'm currently attempting to fix up this previously WP:G13'd draft. There are all kinds of issues there, and not just including that it was in some sort of WP class project.
Your thoughts about this? Pete AU aka--Shirt58 (talk) 11:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Gbaxter333

You requested speedy deletion of User talk:Gbaxter333, which I fulfilled because it was eligible for that. (You asked for {{db-author}}, at a time when you were the sole author of the page.) However, I'm not sure that was what you really intended, given that you added more content to the page after requesting speedy deletion. If you want your content to be restored, please let me know. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blaxtrast Page

I am quite new to this and was wondering to get input on the faults of the page i created? From what i believe, i was typing in a neutral perspective and not a general. I was wondering if i can receive help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaxtrast (talk • contribs) 22:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, but i am curious, for instance on celebrity wiki pages and such, i was trying more to create something in that type of form and not a personal page, any suggestions to the edit to make that page more into that type of form? similar to Skrillex's, I'm not entirely sure how to reference his page threw coding but if you search him through here or on my created page i linked it to his page. (Blaxtrast (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC))[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Legend of Sleepy Hollow may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

shot off by a stray cannonball during [[New York and New Jersey campaign|"some nameless battle"]]{{c of the [[American Revolutionary War]], and who "rides forth to the scene of battle in nightly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Hey there, thank you for the barnstar, much appreciated. I've semi-protected your pages for a couple of days following the vandalism earlier. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: GolfNow

I've actually been rewriting the article to remove the promotional fluff and make it a bit more informative. I was also the one who reported those two users on UAA. ViperSnake151 Talk 17:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Butuan Polysports Complex AfD

Hi there. You AfDd Butuan Polysports Complex. The creator also created Urios Arena. I can't find a thing to support it. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Polysports Complex and the FSUU Gym

Hi. Those 2 arenas are different locations. The Polysports Complex is at the Brgy. Baan Km. 3, and the FSUU Gym is at the J.C. Aquino Ave., both from Butuan City. But the references are there also.

SALAMAT. (thanks.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 08:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sylviidae

I'm curious why you added the peacock template to Sylviidae. The article isn't great, but it doesn't really read like it's trumpeting the importance of the family. Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabine's Sunbird: Removed the "peacock" template. But I added more specific tags within the lead to indicate where there are still problems. --Mr. Guye (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I'll look at that. I'd suggest that the statement about the family being a poorly defined wastebin is neutral. No one really disputed that that was the case, it just existed for a long time because no one really knew what else to do with those species (how all such wastebins arise really). Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]