User talk:Mr.TinjuRaj

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thandar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thandar was changed by Mr.TinjuRaj (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89015 on 2017-12-02T16:29:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thandar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thandar, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Thandar was changed by Mr.TinjuRaj (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971673 on 2017-12-04T04:41:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thandar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources. You can not use a Wikipedia article as a source. - MrX 14:06, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add caste/community to disambiguation pages listing people with same surnames: it is not relevant there. utcursch | talk 15:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Panicker. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You now have two people pointing out to you in edit summaries and at Talk:Panicker the inappropriateness of your edits to Panicker. Please do not reinstate your changes again without discussing your reasoning on the talk page. Largoplazo (talk) 10:30, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Panicker, you may be blocked from editing. This is for repeating the behavior for which you've already been warned. Largoplazo (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to this, please do not add caste and ethnicity where they are not relevant. For example, Geevarghese Panicker may be an Ezhava, but he is not notable for being an Ezhava: he is notable for being a priest and an educationalist. His caste/community may be mentioned in the "Early life" or "Personal life" section in the article about him (with a reliable source, of course), but it has no place in a list of people surnamed Panicker. utcursch | talk 15:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopi Panicker

Hello Mr.TinjuRaj,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gopi Panicker for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 18:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mr.TinjuRaj reported by User:Bellezzasolo (Result: ). Thank you. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 19:00, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of G.N.Panicker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on G.N.Panicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 19:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Mr.TinjuRaj - IDHT SPA. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 19:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopi Panicker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gopi Panicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lokanatha Panicker) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lokanatha Panicker, Mr.TinjuRaj!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Not ready for mainspace; please work on this at Lokanatha Panicker.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rama Panicker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rama Panicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just create an article with a random sentence. You need to provide proper sourcing. Look what I did for G.N. Panicker --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Mr.TinjuRaj - IDHT SPA. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Mr.TinjuRaj, as the speedy deletion notice always says, please don't remove the notice from articles you have created yourself, as you have done at many of your articles. It is disruptive. Also, please stop removing redirects from articles, as you did at Thandar (unsourced) and repeatedly from Ambanattu Panicker (a copyright violation), etc. Also, please stop creating non-viable articles such as Lokanatha Panicker, Patheenatha Panicker, Gopi Panicker, Rama Panicker, Akathayyadi panicker, C.K. Kumara Panikker, etc. Your fast creation of non-viable articles (those were all created today!) makes too much work for other people. Please read Wikipedia:Your first article before you create another. I'm afraid you will be blocked from editing if you keep creating articles that aren't suitable for Wikipedia, and then try to stop them being deleted by removing the speedy tag. See also the other problems described on WP:ANI, as per NeilN's note above. Bishonen | talk 20:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 20:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE: There are 3 types of PANICKER surnames: 1: ezhava panicker 2: nair panicker 3: ezhava converted panicker (suriyani christian)

thus the reason adding caste surname is required  to avoid confusion .

PLEASE NOTE: There are 3 types of PANICKER surnames: 1: ezhava panicker 2: nair panicker 3: ezhava converted panicker (suriyani christian)

thus the reason adding caste surname is required  to avoid confusion .

NOW I REQUEST YOU TO UNBLOCK ME FOR EDITING

That's like saying there are different "types" of Smith—Catholic Smiths, Protestant Smiths, Jewish Smiths—so a user of Smith (surname) is going to be completely unable to find the Smith they're looking for if we don't put "Jewish" in front of the descriptions of all the Jewish ones. Because even if you distinguish them by saying one's a poet, one's a general, one's a professor of physics—in other words, what they're known for—it's still so confusing if you don't tell people which of them are the Jewish ones. Largoplazo (talk) 10:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

now i understood PLEASE UNBLOCK ME ,i need to edit

but why you removed Thandar ? old one was correct ...

seems you are CONVERTED christian , or might be other hindu caste?

It amazes me how some people are so stuck on looking at the world through the lens of group identification that they can't imagine other people genuinely not being involved in their particular rivalries and, when someone says "group identity is irrelevant here" they can only interpret it as "your group identity is irrelevant here because I'm in a rival group". The funniest (and saddest) instance was when someone here called me an anti-Semite—just a few minutes before I, a Jewish person, headed out to a Passover seder. Largoplazo (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr.TinjuRaj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

now i understood PLEASE UNBLOCK ME ,i need to edit

but why you removed Thandar ? old one was correct ...

seems you are CONVERTED christian , or might be other hindu caste?

Decline reason:

You have shown no understanding of why you were blocked, and when you make assumptions in your unblock request about editors' affiliations, while you were blocked for disruptively editing regarding those affiliations, you guarantee that any unblock will be quite a while away. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:22, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Lokanatha Panicker

Hello, Mr.TinjuRaj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lokanatha Panicker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 11:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]