User talk:Mpluess

Welcome

Hello, Mpluess! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Crusio (talk) 11:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Environmental sensitivity has been accepted

Environmental sensitivity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Figure 1. Models of Environmental Sensitivity.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Figure 1. Models of Environmental Sensitivity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Vantage Sensitivity.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Vantage Sensitivity.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vantage sensitivity (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article should be based on what other people say about the concept, not on the research and theories of the authors themselves. Are there any reliable sources that talk about this?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vantage sensitivity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vantage sensitivity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– bradv🍁 03:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mpluess! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – bradv🍁 03:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vantage sensitivity (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all opinion, and peripheral material, and remove references that are not to peer-reviewed articles in major journals or major books from academic publishers.

What you need to show is that the concept is widely adopted, and not jsut by the originators and their students.

If any of the papers are particularly often cited ( more than 200 times) , add the citation figures from Google Scholar or Scopus . This will help show the wide acceptance

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vantage sensitivity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vantage sensitivity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 01:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following your comments, this article was shortened in order to read more like an encyclopaedia article. To show that the vantage sensitivity model is widely accepted, only peer-reviewed sources from leading journals were cited (including article that according to Google Scholar was cited more than 600 times; i.e., Pluess & Belsky). Is there a specific way of including the citation figures with the reference to the article? Mpluess (talk) 08:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vantage sensitivity

Hello, Mpluess. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vantage sensitivity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vantage sensitivity

Hello, Mpluess. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vantage sensitivity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mpluess, I have undeleted the draft at your request. If you are connected to the subject of Vantage sensitivity, you'll have to disclose the same. See WP:DISCLOSE on how to do this. Jay (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a follow-up request to respond, if you are a connected contributor. Jay (talk) 01:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Thanks, We will amend the draft accordingly. Mpluess (talk) 16:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  You may have misunderstood. The disclosure will have to be made at your user page User:Mpluess. Jay 10:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BIOPATH (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BIOPATH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BIOPATH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vantage sensitivity (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

looks like original research

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vantage sensitivity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assessment and comments. Vantage Sensitivity is a new but established concept in psychology. I think this entry will be helpful for people that want to learn more about this important concept. We do cite several peer-reviewed papers that include the original authors of the concept because these are the most highly cited publications. For example, the first reference represents the main publication (published in one of the top journals in psychology) and has been cited more than 600 times according to google scholar. A quick search on google scholar shows a significant number of papers that refer to Vantage Sensitivity (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=vantage+sensitivity&btnG=). A search on google also yields a large number of hits (https://www.google.com/search?q=vantage+sensitivity&oq=vantage+sensitivity&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i512j0i22i30l3j69i60l3.2384j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8). I responded to all comments of previous assessments and also acknowledge the potential conflict of interest given that I am one of the leading authors. Hence, I'm wondering whether you would be willing to reconsider your decision to reject this entry. Thanks a lot. Mpluess (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vantage sensitivity (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not seeing the independent coverage. Maybe merge and redirect to Jay Belsky, which doesn't seem to mention this, for some reason?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vantage sensitivity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 05:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assessment. Vantage Sensitivity is a concept that has been around since 2011. The main peer-reviewed paper on it has been cited more than 600 times since 2013. If you have a look on google scholar you will see that various researchers refer to Vantage Sensitivity in their independent research (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=vantage+sensitivity). It is mentioned on several Wikipedia pages such as Sensory Processing Sensitivity, Environmental Sensitivity and Differential Susceptibilit hypothesis. It is not mentioned specifically on Jay Belsky but Differential Susceptibility, one of his major contributions, is also not mentioned there (but it is in Differential Susceptibility hypothesis)? With growing interest in the topic, we want to ensure that people can find reliable information on this basic concept. We responded to all previous comments and made continually changes to address comments. Is there any thing else we can do? Thanks for your help. Mpluess (talk) 09:06, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vantage sensitivity has been accepted

Vantage sensitivity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Why? I Ask (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:BIOPATH

Hello, Mpluess. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BIOPATH, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]