User talk:Mph326

Welcome!

Hello, Mph326, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The British Political Tradition, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Scott Mac (Doc) 14:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The British Political Tradition

The article The British Political Tradition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an essay not an article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 14:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The British Political Tradition

Your article was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, intended for uncontroversial deletions, so it is automatically restored on request. I will notify user Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it for the WP:Articles for deletion process, which would involve a discussion lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute.

While I see exactly what Scott Macdonald meant, I am finding it hard to put my finger on the problem so as to advise you. My first thought was that you were putting together facts from different sources to draw a new conclusion, a process we call WP:SYNTHESIS - read that guideline, in fact read the whole of WP:No original research, of which it forms part - but I don't think you are actually doing that, as far as I can see you could cite sources for your conclusions.

I will ask Scott Macdonald if he can give you advice: meanwhile there is a good deal to be done in terms of article layout and structure. Read:

and pick some articles out of the lists of WP:Featured articles and WP:Good articles to see how they are presented. (GAs may be more helpful than FAs, which are very highly-developed.) Articles linked from Political culture might be worth looking at.

One way to get advice on an article is to post a request at WP:Requests for feedback.

I am afraid I have not been as helpful as I hoped to be when I started to write this, but it may give you some pointers. I will add more if more occurs to me. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnCD _ I've made a few amendments to the article. Would you mind having a look if it's made it better. Thanks Mph326

Articles for deletion nomination of The British Political Tradition

I have nominated The British Political Tradition, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The British Political Tradition. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scott Mac (Doc) 19:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]