User talk:mountainhead/Archives/2018

< / mountainhead / User / Contributions / Site

// don't forget to sign your message! (~~~~) // feel free to revert vandalism and fix broken links at your leisure // actual messages instead of prefab templates are always appreciated! :) //

Melodrama (Lorde album)

Despite the fact you came back to revert me over something I did 10 days ago, your note has been rewritten because it wasn't clear whether you meant after the album or the single was released. One could argue it doesn't matter much considering it was added after both, but it should be specified. One could assume otherwise the song was remixed directly after the album's release, then put on there as a bonus rather than because the song was remixed for single release, it was added to the Spotify edition. Ss112 22:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but what I took issue with is the "Spotify added" part; Spotify did nothing. Lorde's label redistributed the album to Spotify with the extra track. You're free to rewrite my note, but don't add something that isn't true. (I'm fine with the way it is now, for the record.)

Also, no, I didn't come back just to revert your edit. I was simply reading the article again, because I wanted to check which song it was that Tove Lo co-wrote, and noticed the updated (and misleading) line. Since I added the note in the first place, I reverted back to my version of it. Why is that so shocking to you? —mountainhead 23:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And because you were asking if "its release" referred to the album or the single: that doesn't matter. Both possible meanings of the sentence convey that the song was added to the record 1) after the original release of Melodrama and 2) after, well, being released, because it can hardly be added to the album if it's not actually out yet. —mountainhead 23:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that my initial rewording was something I wrote without focusing on the obvious fact that Spotify doesn't compile records, bur rather the label. And yes, I pointed that out, but as I also just pointed out, it's not as if artists have never put out an album, then thought to remix or redo a song, then re-release the album with those version(s) included. What the remix was added to the album for was because the song was remixed for single release and became the better known version of that song, not simply an afterthought after the album was put out. Ss112 23:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

…but what is your point? What are you trying to prove to me here? Sure, this isn't the first time that has happened, but why are you telling me that? I never contested that the remix was added to the album because it's its most popular version, and it was remixed after the album had already been released; I merely added the fact that it was added later on to the article. —mountainhead 23:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BBNG2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Blake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc at Talk:Trans woman

Your !vote at Talk:Trans woman#RfC on introduction ("Support 5") doesn't appear to agree with your follow-up comment: "[I] have the easiest time getting behind option 1." Can you please fix the vote, or the comment, so that they agree? Please read WP:REDACT before you change anything. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was specifically talking about the four provided phrases, and said I didn't entirely agree with the wording of any of the four. this isn't contradictory. —mountainhead 11:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then can you rephrase so I understand which one you support? If I can't understand your !vote, perhaps the closing admin might not understand either. Do you support #5, or do you support #1? Or both? Mathglot (talk) 09:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support the one I voted for (in bold), which is #5. (I did add a clarification.) —mountainhead 11:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glints press shot.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Glints press shot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Glints press shot.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

done —mountainhead 16:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glints (musician)

A tag has been placed on Glints (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hitro talk 03:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Glints press shot.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glints press shot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Glints press shot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Glints press shot.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Glints press shot.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glints press shot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mountainhead. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]