User talk:Mouchatm

Margaret Court titles

You're relatively new to editing here so let me explain how wikipedia works. Being bold with edits is fine but if you change a long-standing fact and it is reverted, you must stop re-reverting and bring it to the talk page to convince others your version is correct. Please self-revert your edit now and bring it to talk. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Margaret Court, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. this was already explained to you by multiple editors Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Margaret Court.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Looks like the same type of removal that was done 5 years ago from the same editor. The info has been checked and confirmed per the Australian Open Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As explained on the article talk pages (in case you missed it), both the Official Australian Open and the International Tennis Hall of Fame recognize those mixed doubles titles that you keep removing... so I'm not sure what the issue is. Many times in the past, players have split titles because of rain-outs. It just happens sometimes. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent editing history at 2018 BNP Paribas Open – Women's Singles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you're threatening me, goodbye. Your stupid intimidation is stolen. Mouchatm (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the standard warning {{uw-3rr}}. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mouchatm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]