User talk:Morrow321

Hi, the recent edit you made to Chelsea Clinton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 07:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Chelsea Clinton, you will be blocked from editing. Anastrophe (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BLP discussion

You have been brought up in a discussion thread on the BLP Noticeboard. Badger Drink (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I discussion

I have also opened up a discussion on AN/I concerning your edits, to get a few more perspectives. Badger Drink (talk) 21:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely, since you do not seem to be here for the purpose of building a reputable encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not your personal soapbox to proclaim your personal theories on how JFK was killed. You may appeal this block by appending the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} to this talk page. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Morrow321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account should be unblocked because I have done absolutely nothing wrong. I am here to improve Wikipedia as a more reliable source, especially as it relates to the JFK assassination.

I have over 200+ books and other media relating to the JFK assassination. And most of the finest research that I come across centers on Lyndon Johnson and/or the CIA murdering John Kennedy for a variety of reasons, both personal and ideological. Mafia participation would be secondary to CIA or US Joint Chiefs of Staff involvement.

Currently the Wikipedia mainpage of John Kennedy Assassination is a fraud and a disgrace because it uses the discredited Warren Report and the HSCA report as source materials and it pushes the Big Lie that John Kennedy was murdered by a "lone nut" who in turn was murdered by a "lone nut" Jack Ruby. Wikipedia is in a train wreck of credibility when it comes to the JFK assassination. One would think that after 47 years of revisionism coming out on the JFK assassination that Wikipedia would want a more ACCURATE page. So I asked to be UNBLOCKED as soon as possible so that I can use my expertise to help this web destination out.

It seems to me that the John Kennedy assassination page RIGHT NOW is a personal soapbox for people who are attached to the lies and disinfo of the Warren Report and the JFK assassination. Wiki needs to get accurate in its entry here and quit carrying the water for the murderers of John Kennedy. John Kennedy was murdered by folks like Lyndon Johnson and the CIA for many reasons, both personal and ideological. I think the following source is a heck of a lot more ACCURATE than what is currently appearing on the JFK assassination page:

From Defrauding America, Rodney Stich, 3rd edition 1998 p. 638-639]:

“The Role of deep-cover CIA officer, Trenton Parker, has been described in earlier pages, and his function in the CIA's counter-intelligence unit, Pegasus. Parker had stated to me earlier that a CIA faction was responsible for the murder of JFK … During an August 21, 1993, conversation, in response to my questions, Parker said that his Pegasus group had tape recordings of plans to assassinate Kennedy. I asked him, "What group were these tapes identifying?" Parker replied: "Rockefeller, Allen Dulles, JOHNSON of Texas, GEORGE BUSH, and J. Edgar Hoover." I asked, "What was the nature of the conversation on these tapes?"

I don't have the tapes now, because all the tape recordings were turned over to [Congressman] Larry McDonald. But I listened to the tape recordings and there were conversations between Rockefeller, [J. Edgar] Hoover, where [Nelson] Rockefeller asks, "Are we going to have any problems?" And he said, "No, we aren't going to have any problems. I checked with Dulles. If they do their job we'll do our job." There are a whole bunch of tapes, because Hoover didn't realize that his phone has been tapped. Defrauding America, Rodney Stich, p. 638-639]:

So I request to be unblocked immediately so I can help Wikipedia become a more reliable, more reputable encyclopedia. As it stands now, Wiki JFK assassination page is a complete joke, a 1960's disinfo center for the murderers of John Kennedy and their propagandists. That needs to change! Morrow321 (talk) 03:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Morrow321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing that I be unblocked. I will not engage in disruptive editing or do any damage. I do know a lot about modern American history and politics and I think this resource would be of tremendous use to the Wikipedia community. Robert Morrow Morrow321 (talk) 18:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a soapbox; it's clear your entire purpose is to promote your particular belief in a particular conspiracy theory. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Morrow321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am expert in the JFK assassination. I have 300+ books relating to it. I have not read them all, but I have read at least 20 of them and skimmed the rest. I am a frequent contributor to JFK discussion boards such as Education Forum. I am very well read in the JFK assassination and know a lot about the conspiracy angle to it. I think I would offer great contributions to the Wiki JFK assassination conspiracies page. For example, I think the section dealing with Lyndon Johnson needs to be updated to include Phillip Nelson's "LBJ: the Mastermind of the JFK Assassination" which I think will eventually have big impact on how we understand the JFK assassination. As I look over the footnotes I see some more books that need better representation, such as JFK and the Unspeakable. Why don't you unblock me and see how I perform over at the JFK conspiracies page? I could pull together a lot of quality JFK assassination research - especially relating to the conspiracy angles - that most folks would appreciate. I request to be unblock. Thank-you.

Decline reason:

You clearly have a strong personal opinion about the assassination, and while I personally think you are wrong this is not relevant to the encyclopedia. Your opinion is not relevant either, and persistently pushing it is disruptive. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.