User talk:Morgan Riley

User:Morgan Riley	User talk:Morgan Riley	Contributions to Wikipedia	User:Morgan Riley/Workshop	User:Morgan Riley/sandbox Icon = CC-BY-SA 3.0 by Iconshock	Commons User:Morgan Riley	User:Morgan Riley
User Page	Talk Page	Wikipedia Contributions	Workshop	Sandbox	Commons User Page	Commons Uploads

DYK for Composition roller

Nyttend (talk 11:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Statue images

Hi Morgan,

Thanks for letting me know that you put those images up for deletion. I can't think of any fair-use argument I could make for them, and I would not know where to start with respect to getting permission from the copyright holders of the statues, so I think I'll leave the images to be deleted.

Neelix (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Rees's Cyclopaedia #2

Hi Morgan,

I've just created your suggested page List of Contributors to Rees's Cyclopaedia I just hope there will not be the same kind of flak caused by the creation of the list of long articles, for there were moves to deleted it entirely as being 'un-encyclopaedic'!!. My next job is finish adding info about writers' Rees contributions to their WP pages, so there is a cross reference. Apwoolrich (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Excellent! After I proposed it, I looked back into the history and saw the trouble you had with that one, which made me realize what sort of pitfall I may have stepped into. Hopefully because it is cited, and has a very clear and definite inclusion criteria (it seems that the 15 column definition appeared to some as rather arbitrary), that it should stand a bit better odds. I did move it, however, to match up with the use of the "æ" in the other Cyclopædia articles, so if its not showing up on your watchlist, that might be why. Cheers! Morgan Riley (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

The 15 column definition stems from the Rees Project, and was picked by Prof. Fullmer to reflect the 11,000 word article length, which can be regarded as the size for a definitive account of a topic. But of course what about the shorter articles? The David and Charles reprint has the same defect, in that any piece less than about 350 words was left out. Readers not knowing this might assume that Rees never had the topic. I have a very long MS listing of the biographical articles in Rees that I am pondering how to handle. There was a guy I have lost touch with who photocopied all Burney's musical articles with a view to publishing them in book form, but a Google search shows he never pursued it. When I was working as a publisher's editor I copied the Canals article with all the updates on canals and railways from the later volumes,for publication in book form but that was not taken up. The textiles pages on are line and I have referenced them.

I suppose the obvious answer will be to create a Rees's Cyclopaedia page for each volume on Wikisource with all the article titles listed in the hope that in time the texts can be scanned and OCRd for inclusion.This has been done for EB 11 and other serials. I have used the HathiTrust edition of the various reviews I have cited for use in my research, and making plain text copies was quite straight forward.

The problem will be how to handle the numerous 2 or 3 line dictionary articles, and the numerous pages with tables, maths etc, etc. Also finding enough people interested in doing it! Kind regards. Apwoolrich (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Good stuff

Was snooping your page. Like 99% of what you are for/doing. Go Brave...Squirrels. TCO (talk) 06:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Gunnies

Thanks for your comment at the AfD. Out of interest, what could gunnies be merged into? I know that the word stope is sometimes used, but that's just a redirect at present and it seems to be a less precise term. My knowledge of mining is very biased towards SW England, though, so maybe there's another term that's used worldwide?  —SMALLJIM  11:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Rees's Cyclopaedia #3

Putting my money where my mouth is, I downloaded an HTML copy of the OCRd text of Vol 1 from the Internet Archive, ran it through my text editor Note Tab and converted it to a text document. Have made a start at cutting out all the body text, leaving the topic headings which are in Caps, so OCR well. The problem is that the OCRing of the work is somewhat mangled, so it will be a job to produce decent texts of the articles for WikiSource. The work complete is around 100,000 words for that volume. Once I have produced the list I shall have to check it against the original. I'll keep you posted on how it goes. Apwoolrich (talk) 18:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Westerns project scope

Hi,

I removed Monument Valley from our scope, but retained List of appearances of Monument Valley in the media. Reason being, is to help the project mainly focus on fictional articles, otherwise we would end up with everything from cactus to every model of Colt .45, places, and U.S. state shown in a Western movie and it would become unmanageable. The best place for Monument Valley in a Western context is WP:WikiProject American Old West which is more a non-fiction historical project dealing with real outlaws and places, real cowboys and Indians. By keeping fiction and non-fiction apart, I hope to offer a more specific set of articles for members to contribute towards and it will help people find things easier in the project categories. The non-fictional exceptions of course, are biogs of real actors and directors, writers and such who had a notable role in shaping the Westerns genre. Thanks, however, for the list article.. it is perfectly suited to what we cover and need to work on. On a side note, can you please make sure you class newly tagged articles, as I want to avoid a backlog of unassessed articles. Thanks, Ma®©usBritish^{chat} 13:16, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Noted. My rationale was not really any "Old West" historical element as much as that much of Monument Valley's history and notability is due to its role as a filming location for everyone from John Ford to Sergio Leone to Back to the Future Part III. But it is for each project to decide their scope, and it is easier for a project to remove a tag than to have to seek out ones in need. Cheers. Morgan Riley (talk) 00:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Coalwood, WV

I agree 100% with your comments regarding Coalwood. Particularly irksome is the reference to Big Creek High School, which resides in War, which is several miles down the road from Coalwood. I would be overjoyed to edit the article and remove most of the Rocket Boy Material, and of course most of the data that has been copied from the Coalwood WV page.....let me know when this can happen because, IF I were to do the edits, there would be a galactic level knee spasm that they can no longer read about Homer Hickam. I know Homer, I have corresponded with him, and the fact that the RocketBoys festival has moved to Beckley, a full 70+ miles from Coalwood, speaks violumesCoal town guy (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hmmm, as I live in central Virginia, I doubt my local library has much to help there, but I can try to provide a neutral third party if you have had editing issues with these matters.Morgan Riley (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Morgan Riley; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Pit Towns..dammit, I like that

I love the fact that we are providing a global perspective on this facet of history. HOW may I help? My experience is by my own admission US based, as well, thats about the only area I know well.Coal town Coal town guy (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

As my familial homeland (on one side anyways) is the Shinnston-Clarksburg area, I want to applaud your efforts to digitally immortalize the communities of Appalachia. Bravo! Also, I may want your help soon on a project I have cooking for my local coalfield, though it's on the backburner until I get the assessment/tagging of all the WikiProject Mining pages mostly done (got about a couple hundred left to do; that's how I discovered pit town).Morgan Riley (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Is there a biography of a coal company owner in the UK that you can recall. Thats how I was able to find a documenetd definition. Most of these folks were rather paternalistic, and they were proud of the places they created......Coal town guy (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Re Great Britain, there are many instances of mine owners building houses for the miners, not only for coal but also minerals such as copper, which can be seen in places like Cornwall. Another aspect is the creation of settlements for industrial workers with the introduction of the factory system in the eighteenth century. AFIK its not a topic that has been widely researched, but there is material in each of the volumes of regional textile mills surveys and the one about the Swindon railway town, all published by English Heritage in the 1990s. Apwoolrich (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Pit Village definition and reference for you

I found this take a look its a dam good startCoal town guy (talk) 17:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Mining

Thank you for the invitation, but I am not sure what a project is. What would my task be? - Soerfm (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Please look at recent edits of Cooling tower by 117.192.117.123

That anonymous user added an external link to a company website. When an anonymous newcomer to WP makes only one edit, the addition of a link to his/her company's website, the odds are that he/she is only interested in advertising that company's website. I therefore removed the link ... and 117.192.117.123 added it in again. I removed it a second time and 117.192.117.123 has again added that link.

I don't want to continue this edit "warring" any further. Would you take a look and see what you can do? mbeychok (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Agreed that it looks suspiciously like spam, even if well-intentioned; if not spam, then its marginal educational value should be discussed before its replacement. I removed the link, added the Template:No more links hoping that may help some, and requested that before its replacement that it be discussed at the talk page. Also, good call on 3RR, keeping your cool, and bringing in a third party. Cheers! Morgan Riley (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Fantastic work on the Virginia Portal

I'm really really impressed with your work on the Virginia Portal. I has bothered me for some time, and I was giving serious thought to proposing its deletion - I figured nobody was likely to properly maintain it. However, the automation is brilliant and I think it looks great. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.--Kubigula (talk) 03:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'll keep at it then. Right now the main help I can think of is trying to find "this month in history" dates for some of the "slower news" months. Eventually, I hope to get it to a point where it can be nominated for featured portal.

Thats FANDAMTASTIC work for certain, that portal has come a long way.Coal town guy (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I joined Wikipedia inspired by you. I'm also helping restore a house in Barton Heights, at 2007 Barton. The historical societies that I've contacted say there are no images, yet I've been able to find partial/pieces of images by searching Home St, the nearby houses, etc. I (somewhat obviously) live in Richmond also; If there are any images you've taken or come across that might help us unravel the tangle of bad construction, remodels, owners, etc. I'd be forever in your debt! Any pictures at all would inspire, honestly. Thank you so much for all your hard work! HonorCat (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Weyanoke, WV

Back from the beach, no coal there. Weyanoke Coal and Coke was HUGE at its zenith. Check out Arista, West Virginia and Hiawatha, West Virginia as well. Both of those were in Mercer County. While yes, there was a Weyanoke WV, its greater presence was probably in Hiawatha. Hope this helps. Oh, and the local pronounciation sounds like whyanoke. I also took a look at the ref, very very cool. IF you ever see a ref on Whitby, West Virginia, or its older name Bowyer give me a yellCoal town guy (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

De-templating for WP:Mining

Just saw your removed the template from Talk:Cadwallader Range. That range is the core of the Bridge River goldfield (Bralorne-Pioneer Mine and others. Might I suggest you x-ref these places with mining searches to see why they have WP:Mining on them before you delete their templates? In this case a search for "MINFILE Cadwallader" will find you a bunch.Skookum1 (talk) 00:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the criticism. Part of the issue is trying to figure out how tangential these things are, but mostly I work by taking what's in the article and processing that through the criteria. I do searches to help determine individual minesites, but since there was not a word about it, I couldn't see the connection (quite a many articles are tagged when only tangentially related). It certainly needs some explanation of its connection then. Hopefully I haven't made too many other mistakes, but if you see any more in my attempt to work through the backlog, please let me know. Cheers! Morgan Riley (talk) 01:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I posted a MINFILE google and a book ref on that talkpage.....in general if you find this template on a BC page, I probably put it there, with good reason, even if the article says nothing (yet).Skookum1 (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Richmond meetup for Wikipedia:Wiknic?

I actually live in the Richmond area and could probably snag a friend to go if you wanted to tentatively hold something that day. I don't think I have anything planned, but if you're interested in holding something on Saturday, June 22 I'm willing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Should the Wicnic go ahead on the 22nd, I'd likely attend. - Doesn't seem, however, there's all that much interest so far... Albrecht Conz (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Just for your hard work and being bold. Quack2012 (talk) 16:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Reply

Boy I sure do love Richmond. After serving my country fighting in two wars I finally made my way back to the USofA and my base in CA. It had been several years since I had been "home", and I decided to check up on the city to see how it was doing. You see when ever I travel, I use Wikipedia as a source for learning about that particular city, as I am sure millions (if not billions) of other netizens do-- E.g. sites to see, things to do, history, weather, etc. So naturally, to check up on my beloved city I visited the Wikipedia page. I was quite dismayed to find that the Richmond, VA site had images that were dated, or didn't reflect the true character of the city, and didn't seem to highlight the best attributes of the city. Actually after reviewing the article, it seems that the people that are spending their time making edits to the article hardly seem to care much about the city at all or are oblivious to what makes it unique for the vast majority of citizens. There are some downright negative views on there. I vowed to take some time to show my appreciation for the city I love.

Now that I am back home, I have some more time on my hands. I figured I would help do my part to show those that want to learn a little more about what the city is really all about. A lot has happened in the past couple decades, but the page sure didn't reflect that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.183.126.166 (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome back! I too love Richmond (and Virginia more broadly, amongst various interests), and so have spent countless hours trying to gradually bring up the quality of the various pages and images for it. I would welcome any suggestions you have. Moreover, if you would like help or advice on how to edit or otherwise contribute to Wikipedia, please let me know! Morgan Riley (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Sure. How about you let other people have a chance to provide factual information about their city. Based on the edit history it seems that the wiki Richmond, VA page is just the "Morgan Riley's Richmond, VA page". Yes, it might be the most factual Richmond, VA page around, but it also one of the most uninteresting. There can be factual content that is impartial and not completely sterile too. This should be a true representation of the people that make the city.

I am sure Richmond doesn't have nearly as many willing contributors as the larger metropolises. But it also doesn't help that the few that are willing to try to contribute get shot down so frequently. Other people want to share their (fact based) part of the Richmond story, but every time they have done so it just gets wiped. You definitely have the wiki experience to overrule any contributor and you sure aren't shy to use it. But why not take some time to go out of your way and bring their contributions up to code instead of just removing other peoples stuff all the time?

Obviously we aren't all experts at Wikipedia. But the result of what you are doing, unintended or otherwise, is that the Richmond Wikipedia page is in no way a true representation of what Richmond is really all about. You have turned it into a one-sided fact book that is seemingly too timid to explore any of the aspects of what makes the city what it is. Sure you have to be balanced-- I get it. But don't just gut the article to make it happen. If that is what you are trying to accomplish, why stop with removing one or two posts every now and then? How about just remove all content and leave the words "Richmond, Virginia". That seems pretty safe, right? Sure, you are a loyal Wikipedia editor, but you are doing a disservice to the city of Richmond and the citizens who love it and want to share it with the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.183.126.166 (talk) 16:19, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

File:VirginiaBarnstar.PNG	The Virginia Barnstar
	For the considerable amount of assessment work you have done yesterday and today for WP:VIRGINIA, I hereby award you this barnstar. Great work! :) Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

• Agreed. The amount of work and backlog reduction you have done recently for WPVA is amazing!--Mojo Hand (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Wow, thank you all! I figured if WPVA wants to make real progress, the assessment backlog needed to go. Let me know what else I may be able to help with! Morgan Riley (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 22 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the James H. Dooley page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Tailings dam disasters

Please see my proposal to rename Category:Tailings dam disasters (which you created) and its parent cat here. Opinions and comments welcome.--NortyNort (Holla) 22:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Colony of Virginia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• <!--|national_motto = (presently researching, believe to be "En dat Virginia quintum"-->
• Augusta Academy, a classical school that would evolve into [[Washington and Lee University]] (though would not grant its first batcherlor's degree until 1785.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

History of Petersburg, Virginia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of Petersburg, Virginia, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://searches.linkpendium.com/cache-retrieve.html?state=us&idx=0&id=1662777.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi from Dale Enterprise

Hi, Morgan, I think in February you stopped by the Dale Enterprise, Virginia page that I started, introduced yourself and very kindly invited contact with questions, etc. I am a very occasional contributor, but might like to follow up with you. What is the scope of your Wikipedia interests? The Dale Enterprise, Virginia page is in a couple of the unincorporated communities categories (Virginia, Rockingham County). Thank you for your offer! --DBK (talk) 16:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Upcoming attractions in DC

Hello!

Here are some upcoming DC meetups in April and May:

• Tuesday, April 14: National Archives Hackathon on Wikipedia Space with American University – 2:30-5pm

  See the latest work on the Wikipedia Space exhibit in the new NARA Innovation Hub and brainstorm on new ideas for a public exhibit about Wikipedia

• Friday, April 17: Women in Tech Edit-a-thon with Tech LadyMafia – 5-9pm

  Team up with Tech LadyMafia to improve Wikipedia content on women in the history of technology.

• Saturday, April 25: April Dinner Meetup – 6 PM

  Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!

• Friday, May 1: International Labour Day Edit-a-Thon – 1:30 PM to 4:30 PM

  An edit-a-thon at the University of Maryland

Hope to see you at these events! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.

Cheers,

James Hare

To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Virginia Tech Project Invite

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Virginia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Go Hokies (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February events and meetups in DC

Greetings from Wikimedia DC!

February is shaping up to be a record-breaking month for us, with nine scheduled edit-a-thons and several other events:

• On Friday, February 12, NPR will host a Black History Month First Edit event.
• On Saturday, February 13 and Sunday, February 14, we're working with the Wiki Education Foundation to hold a series of four edit-a-thons at the AAAS 2016 Annual Meeting.
• On Tuesday, February 16, we're holding the Smithsonian American Art Museum and American University WikiWorkshop with Professor Andrew Lih's class.
• On Saturday, February 20, the Smithsonian American Art Museum will host the African American Artists Edit-a-Thon.
• On Friday, February 26, Howard University will host its second annual Black History Month Edit-a-Thon.
• On Saturday, February 27, we have three different events. In the morning, we're holding an Accessibility Edit-a-Thon at Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library. In the afternoon, we'll host our second February WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle, followed by our monthly dinner meetup at Vapiano.

We hope to see you at one—or all—of these events!

Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at info@wikimediadc.org!

Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

You're receiving this message because you signed up for updates about DC meetups. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the list.

March events and meetups in DC

Greetings from Wikimedia DC!

Looking for something to do in DC in March? We have a series of great events planned for the month:

• On Wednesday, March 9, we'll host our first March WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle.
• On Friday, March 11, the National Archives will host the Women in the Civil War Edit-a-Thon.
• On Saturday, March 19, the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian will host the Color History with the Smithsonian! event, and we'll hold our second Accessibility Edit-a-Thon at the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library.
• On Sunday, March 20, the American Chemical Society will host the Computers in Chemistry Edit-a-Thon.
• On Saturday, March 26, we'll host our second March WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle, followed by our monthly dinner meetup at Vapiano.

Can't make it to an event? Most of our edit-a-thons allow virtual participation; see the guide for more details.

Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at info@wikimediadc.org!

Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

You're receiving this message because you signed up for updates about DC meetups. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the list.

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Morgan Riley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ship transport or maritime transport?

You have previously discussed the title of the ship transport article. There is a proposal to move this article at Talk:Ship transport if you care to participate. —  AjaxSmack  21:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Morgan Riley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Morgan Riley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I have reviewed approximately 45 portals for US states, as well as more than a hundred other portals, and Portal:Virginia is the only one that I have found so far that is actually being maintained. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

File:De Vinne 1904 - Punch and matrix.jpg

Hi Morgan, someone in "meatspace" who knows I'm an avid Wikipedian pointed out an apparent error with your File:De Vinne 1904 - Punch and matrix.jpg. The metadata says it's from pages 16-17 of a 1904 work by Theodore Low De Vinne, but it seems to actually be from page 55 from an 1876 work by the same author. If I'm right, I'm happy to make the edits and request a criterion 3 rename over at Commons. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything... --BDD (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for catching that! Sure enough, the link I cited simply doesn't show it. It must have been a clerical error of transposition when I was working with my citations. I try to be thorough, but given the amount I have uploaded, something was bound to be off eventually. Please go ahead and submit the correction. Morgan Riley (talk) 21:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)