User talk:Moreau36/Archive 1

NOTE: This page is officially archived. To post a comment, post it at the main talk page, please. Thanks.

Population of Lake Buena Vista

Where did you get the figures in [1]? Lake Buena Vista is a city under the control of the Walt Disney Company, and there is no way it would have 1776 people. This may have been for an associated census-designated place, but cannot be true of the city itself; thus I have reverted it. --SPUI (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to get a map of the area they called LBV back in 1990? I don't see how it could have that many people, unless they counted tourists, which would differ from both 1980 and 2000. There's no way Disney would allow that many people to live inside the city. Was there some sort of change in the way things were computed - maybe timeshares were included in 1990 but not in 2000? --SPUI (talk) 05:52, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed the census bureau with some questions about this. After the initial shock I find it very intriguing; thanks for bringing it to my attention. I also note that Bay Lake, Florida had a population of 0 in 1990; I guess the development north of the lake wasn't built yet. --SPUI (talk) 09:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've figured it out - Talk:Lake Buena Vista, Florida --SPUI (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Another place that changed dramatically was the unincorporated community of East Blythe, California. According to the census, the community's population fell from 1,511 in 1990 to only 3 in 2000 due to the annexing by Blythe city. This was a big shocker for me. (Although Census Designated Places are hard to figure out and perdict)."

I guess the really strange thing in this case is that LBV is an incorporated place that deannexed the area, specifically to avoid having a high population. --SPUI (talk) 22:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of populations

I've removed the list of populations on Tampa, Florida. I think it's interesting stuff, but I'd rather see it in a paragraph form and not a list, as it's not aesthetically pleasing. Mike H (Talking is hot) 02:00, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

California Cities

Hello, Moreau36. I see you have made a good effort to clean up the list of cities in California. I improved the list of cities page to include just the 478 cities that are incorporated. I cited my source as an external link. I made sure the four cities I deleted are included in the "cities and places" list.

--GraemeMcRae 05:08, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jacksonville, Florida

Thanks for finding map for the page. I've been trying to find that for awhile. If you like, I'm trying to improve the page; and I'm open to volunteers. If you don't want to help, it's fine; if you do, I could always use it. Thanks either way! HereToHelp 18:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm working on city/town pages that are lacking maps and inserting them as many as possible. This may look different from the previous version, in which I don't know why it was deleted from the page in the first place, anyhoo, Unlike that last map, this one shows the exact boundaries of the city and it's suburban communities. I'll try my best to improve this article as much as I can!! --Moreau36; 1431, 23 Octiber 2005 (UTC)

Apple Valley incorporation

My error...thanks! Mikeetc

Michigan Template

You wrote: The only reason why places such as Clinton, Waterford (which contain the separate community of Drayton Plains), Shelby, and Canton are easily comparable to a Saginaw, Lansing, or Kalamozoo is due to it's heavy population density around the area. They aren't exactly communities. Communities are usually within a township. In fact in a few states, incorporated towns or villages are within a township.

I'm afraid this is an incorrect understanding of the situation with these "communities". They are for all practical purposes indistinguishable from nearby cities. And they very much have a community identity (or at least as much as any large urban area has). While it is true that in less urbanized areas, there may be several smaller unincorporated communities within a general law township. But that is not the case with these.

Places such as Drayton Plains, Michigan or Sheldon's Corners may have had a historical identity, but little remains at present to make those places easily distinguishable from the surrounding area. The existence of neighborhoods within an urban area is no different from that of many cities. User:Bkonrad 18:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I well know how confusing CDPs and unincorporated communities can be. I've done a fair amount of research into them (at least as regards Michigan). Being labeled as a place on a map or gazetteer is a good start, but still means little since many, perhaps most, commercial mapmakers do relatively little to verify how accurate or up to date things like municipal boundaries or the status of tiny places are. I know some maps draw extensively for their list of place names from the USGS (which also does relatively little to stay up to date with tiny places. You'll see many of these classified with a FIPS category of unverified. The "post office" in Drayton Plains is in fact only a P.O. box. There is no "office" to speak and you won't see it listed as an office at the USPS site (although you will get to the Waterford Post Office, which is nearby but of relatively recent construction). Lessons Learned -- don't rely on mapmakers unless they explicitly make a claim about having researched and verified the status of everything on their maps. Otherwise, chance are they have simply based the map an older map and have corrected only the most easily verifiable infomation. Cheers. older≠wiser 11:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

census

Moreau - I've been doing some cleanup of the bad links in wikipedia, and I noticed that you've been adding a lot of good population data to some cities and towns in Florida. (mainly links o census sites). It's good data and a good reference so I wanted to thank you for doing your part. I just wanted to let you know that you don't need double bracets on external links, and you don't need to put in a number. For an example of what I mean, see this change I made to one of your links. Take care! --Bachrach44 19:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the United Federation of Planets

You may find the folowing template of interest :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 02:44, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Orleans

See Talk:New Orleans, Louisiana#Time's estimate for my response to your comment on my talk page. Dystopos 21:10, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Largo, Fl

I've been adding to the Largo, Florida page and I'm concerned with all the external links I've added. Is it possible to have too many? I also wonder if the timeline should have a page of his own. Could you take a loo at it?

Thanks,

Mikereichold 02:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Largo, Thanks

Mikereichold 03:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Louisville, Kentucky

Thanks for the kind comment. I am frustrated as well by all the reverts and the unreasonable attitude displayed by the other users (user?) Some people just cannot understand that the issue of city populations is nuanced and the only way any real comparisons can be made is if rules are adhered to, and the Census makes those rules and applies them consistently across the country (well, that's the hope - there is no real alternative, anyway). The clamoring for "Sweet Sixteen" in Louisville is like skyscraper owners mounting ever taller antennae atop their buildings in pursuit of the title of being the tallest. I still am not clear on whether any municipalities besides Louisville continue to exist in Jefferson County, but if they do, there is no way that Louisville can include them in its population. In that case, the article should not even mention a claim to be the 16th largest or to have 700,000 residents within the city limits. Denvoran 20:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Florida

I noticed from Category:Wikipedians in Florida that you are a floridian and I have created a state wikiproject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Florida. So far is it very small but it could be expanded later. Join it if you want and help set tasks etc. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AOL vandalism

Those doggone shifting proxies that AOL uses make it darn near impossible to block any of them for any length of time unless a lot of really chronic vandalism is coming from one...and even then we have to be careful because of the collateral damage. Not much we can do except shoo the vandals off and keep shooing until they get the message. Thanks for letting me know. I really appreciate the faith! - Lucky 6.9 07:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Community Template

I apologize, but I'm not sure that I know what you mean. All the Infobox Community templetes previously in use were replaced by Infobox City before the deletion occured, and no images (to my knowledge) were lost. For instance, Bellevue, Washington and Redmond, Washington still have their location maps inside their templetes.

You may have meant that you wanted all the orphaned images in Category:Census Bureau images placed into their respective pages. If that is the case, I would be happy to help; but I need some clarification on your request first. — Seven Days » talk 17:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:On Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

Thanks for your support. I'll admit i am no expert when it comes to the subject, but i have done, what i belive, is more then my fair share of research to back up my claims, and support the information that i am trying to present. As for the actions of this other user, all i can say is that is dispointing. I interpert this site to be a colberation, yet his actions have shown, from the start, that he seems to be unwilling to colabrate and is completely indifrent to the opinions of other editors, who have add substationaly to the rgument and to the articles in question. I find the user to be no less then 2 faced, he states one thing, and does another, like his stating to want to come to a comprimise, yet he continues to remove the category listings from articles, his action are no less then distruptive. Considering this is a user who syayes that he from Philadelphia, and graduated from Kennedy School of Goverment, makes this even more disapointing. The other thing i have just as dispointing is the lack of action by other users in the prevention of this useres actions, even to the point where some have errionusly supported his actions. It should also be stated that this user is also attempting, with several others, to have me baned. Anyway, thanks again. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 22:41, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Compromise

Look here Proposed compromise evrik 21:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baker, CA

Sorry for accidentally removing Baker, California from Category:Unincorporated communities in California -- and thanks for catching this! --ScottMainwaring 15:47, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Population figures

Hi Moreau36, I apologize for saying you were in error. It appears there are actually different ways of consolidating cities, so actually we were both right. I have edited my earlier statement to remove the part where I said you were wrong. No hard feelings I hope. Kaldari 00:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Bradleybrian.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bradleybrian.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 06:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suitland, Maryland

Thanks for your work on the Suitland page. I think that there is lots of evidence that even though revitalization programs are ongoing, Suitland remains a very dangerous place. A quick walk through the neighborhood would easily convince someone that crime is still a serious problem, but lots of people have written about it too. Check out [2] and [3]. Keeping my comment about Suitland being 'very dangerous' is reinforced by crime statistics, news reports and even the Prince Georges County Planning Department. I look forward to your comments. 68.33.74.123 02:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arlington County, Virginia

Hey Moreau, I wanted to let you know that I have nominated Arlington County, Virginia as a candidate for US Collaboration of the Week. The article is in need of much help and with a little group effort, it could be brought to Featured Article status! I brought this to your attention as I have seen you have contributed to the article in the recent past. Please cast your vote with your signature at the US Collaboration of the Week page under Arlington County, Virginia. --Caponer 02:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Magdalene, FL

While this neighborhood is not located in the city limits of Tampa (as the neighborhood is north of Fowler Avenue, and west of Armenia Avenue) it should be noted somewhere on this article, and similar articles (like Carrollwood, etc) that these areas retain Tampa mailing addresses. You cannot mail something to Carrollwood, FL-- you would mail it to Tampa, FL 33618. The same goes for Lake Magdalene, you would mail to either Tampa, FL 33612, or 33613. I feel it should be noted somewhere so that people do not think these areas are separate towns. Rellman 15:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

East Lake Square Mall

Just to let you know that i've put speedy delete tags on East Lake Square Mall as i don't believe that the article asserts the significance of the mall. If there's something special about this mall, then please write about it and remove the tag. Thanks! Inner Earth 21:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the tag. My gut feeling is that it's going to get another challenge through AFD, so watchlist the article and brace yourself. And meanwhile, if you can expand the article, please do. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Westchase Houston

Don't worry about it—not offended at all. —RJN 00:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]