User talk:Mooshberry

Welcome!

Hello, Mooshua1857, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinot noir

I undid the deletion to this article because this https://www.skurnik.com/sku/pinot-noir-bests-great-western-2-2-2-2/ seems to support the statement. I would prefer something a little more definite which is why I added a citation needed tag instead of just adding the reference. Your revert for lack of a citation was not necessarily wrong; I just thought I would quickly look into a little deeper. I think that the tag is more appropriate under the circumstances. Happy editing. Donner60 (talk) 05:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! You are absolutely correct, I had simply suspected due to the wording it was generic vandalism. Thank you for looking deeper into it, and I will make sure to do that in the future. Mooshua1857 (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Lock Upp Show

You foreigner don't know anything about Indian shows. There is already a separate page for season 1 of lock upp. All the content i am removing is already present in that page as this content is of season 1 which i created today (check my editing history) Make sure you do good research. That page is for lock upp show and not for content of season 1 of lock upp show. I don't know how to talk so doing these. 27.56.202.48 (talk) 19:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, yes, talk pages are absolutely the best way to do this and you've done everything right when sending this message. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I've looked further and you are right, the content is a duplicate of the season 1 page. Sorry, I've undone my edit and removed my warning. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Sorry for the rough patch! Wishing you the best on Wikipedia :^) Mooshua1857 (talk) 19:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arceus to Arkoos

Hey! Just so you know, this is all caused by a Youtuber known as M&JTV who has a running joke that no one knows how to pronounce "Arceus" so he pronounces it as "Arkoos". It came from one of his videos. I myself am a fan of him, however I know that pronunciation is merely a joke. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for letting me know :^) Mooshua1857 (talk) 02:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm fairly sure he's told his fans not to edit Wikipedia to change it to that (I can't remember if he actually has), however they are clearly ignoring him. If IPs continue changing it just request the page be protected at WP:RFPP ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Code motion has been accepted

Code motion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	for your work on Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 23:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What??!? You deserve it more than I do! Mooshua1857 (talk) 23:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Cartwright edit

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Wikipedia. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning 79.76.105.165

You issued a level-2 warning without a level-1 warning being given. Could you change the warning to Uw-vandalism1? Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 23:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Faster than Thunder: For what its worth, you don't need to use multi-level warnings in order—in fact, some edits are so obviously bad faith it doesn't make sense to use a level 1 ~TNT (talk • she/her) 23:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pachygyria

In the future, when you see somebody's edit with an edit summary that says "See Talk Page" (as I wrote) try actually looking at the talk page and waiting a couple minutes for the promised discussion to be posted. Or just take the effort to look at the History to see what was edited, instead of up making wild paranoid assumptions. You reverted my edit only a few seconds after I made it. I went immediately to the Talk page to start the discussion, and when I returned to the main page you had already reverted it. Your irrational impatience and careless editing is your problem, not the fault of honest, careful editors like me. Wikipedia will not explode and cease to exist if you wait five minutes and take the time to think about your edits instead of acting on random knee-jerk reactions. Being careful and courtious won't kill you. Every single time I have been reverted, it was by someone too impatient and/or careless to read the Talk page, who as a result didn't know what they were doing. Careless editing and random unjustified reverts just makes more messes for editors like me to clean up.

2601:441:4400:1740:A18B:5282:CC9F:9030 (talk) 00:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

There is currently a discussion at Incidents regarding edit war on Southern Federal District. The thread is COPYVIO and admin right abuse at Southern Federal District by IronGargoyle. Thank you. Please note that this discussion was started by the anonymous user, but they did not inform everyone involved so I am. –DMartin 02:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! I appreciate the initiative :). Shame it's closed already. mooshberry->talk; 19:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February songs

Thank you for fighting vandalism for the 300-years-old cantata! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today: the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]