User talk:Moongirl12345678

This is Moongirl12345678's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Connor (actor) (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Festucalex was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Improperly sourced and formatted. Please read H:FOOT and H:MARKUP, edit accordingly, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Connor (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 06:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moongirl12345678! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 〜 Festucalex • talk 06:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Festucalex, I am fairly new to this. I am confused as to what sources are not Reliable.. most are from direct websites that the person is involved with, industry pages, news articles, the BBC and the relevant show websites.... Can you help me figure this one out please. which references are not reliable? Granted, I did think that the YouTube connect might have been a little unreliable, however that is from his YouTube directly. I have given multiple references in some cases to double down on the information. Can you point out specifically which references are not reliable and/or explain what I am doing wrong when referencing? Moongirl12345678 (talk) 09:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an article that explains the concept. As a rule of thumb, if anyone can add content, it's not a reliable source. And before you ask, Wikipedia does not consider Wikipedia to be a reliable source. Kleuske (talk) 09:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joseph Connor (actor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph Connor (actor). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Moongirl12345678. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Copyright concerns

You appear to have been taking numerous images from the internet and social media and uploading them as if they are your own. This is not acceptable, and I am working through them, marking them for deletion. If you are this person, or are connected to the person you are writing about in some way, you should declare your Conflict of Interest on your userpage. Continuing to upload copyright images will get you blocked from making further uploads as we take copyright very seriously and always err on the side of protecting the copyright holder. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really understand how it works with photos, I have made a few mistakes there. However two of the photos from me in the audience were taken on my phones. I know not allowed really in a theatre but both were done at points in the show where it was accepted. ie the bows and final concert in regards to the rock you photo. I have no connect with the artist apart from I follow his career and have travelled around to watch him perform for nearly 15/16 years now. The other photos because they were used on publications, ie. BBC I thought were ok to be used as numerous press outlets used them. I didn't realise I had said they were mine apologies. I was cheeky with the headshot, but again it's used in programs, online and on numerous socials that I thought it was ok and I did tag the photographer who I have met in the past. I will take down the ones that aren't mine apologies. Moongirl12345678 (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joseph Connor (actor) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph Connor (actor). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Connor (actor) (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Edward-Woodrow were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Connor (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Connor (actor)

Hello, Moongirl12345678. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Connor (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Connor (actor)

Hello, Moongirl12345678. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Connor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]