User talk:Moobelle

Claudius mittendorfer

Please have a look at WP:PEOPLE. BTW, are you using two user accounts? User:Moobelle and User:LauraCooperBrown? Wikipedia editors are generally expected to edit using only one account. See Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, this is a serious issue. --Ben Ben (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I didn't understand that the article has to be supported by evidence of significance. Will come back to this at another time. Re Moobelle and LauraCooperBrown, I couldn't remember my sign in then signed into the wrong one. Will delete moobelle. New to this! But planning to learn. (Moobelle (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]
- Thank you for your answer. Welcome to Wikipedia! Something to read about is here (I never planed to read this when I started, after years of editing I am halfway trough it). If you have a question, just ask or just watch others editing, that is easier. --Ben Ben (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- About the user name LauraCooperBrown, if this is your real name, please see WP:USERNAME: Consider carefully before creating an account in your real name, or a nickname which might be traced to you, as these increase the potential for harassment, especially if you edit in controversial subject areas. ... --Ben Ben (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks so much! Very useful information. Moobelle will stay! (Moobelle (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Moobelle/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 04:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Moobelle, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 04:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Moobelle, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne-France Dautheville has been accepted

Anne-France Dautheville, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 09:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellen O'Neal (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying the simplest standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ellen O'Neal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moobelle: Notability concerns aside, this was nicely written. Rebb ing 22:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ellen O'Neal

Hello, Moobelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ellen O'Neal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]