User talk:Monty845/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Monty845. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Op Privilege Policy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Op Privilege Policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!


Stubs		Cleanup
	Amritapuri		Beta-titanium
	FF Scala		Dental braces
	Pacific Linguistics		Deposit insurance
	Green Mountain Giant	Merge
	Bell jar		Toxic waste
	Richie George		I Wanna: The Remixes
	Christopher Columbus (TV series)		Small arms proliferation
	Paranthan	Add sources
	Gary Stone		Stuart: A Life Backwards
	Hideyo Arisaka		List of Earth starships in Stargate
	Mahiyangana		All-Star Squares
	Club Daze Volume II: Live in the Bars	Wikify
	Euro Beach Soccer League		Hamid Karzai
	Chief Financial Officer of Florida		2013 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (AFC)
	Club Daze Volume 1: The Studio Sessions		Air Warrior (U.S. Army)
	Robert of Alençon	Expand
	Puerto Castilla, Honduras		Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
	Lëtzebuerger Journal		Deva people
	FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (OFC)		Game design

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Captions

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Captions. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!


Stubs		Cleanup
	Euro Beach Soccer League		Beta-titanium
	Pacific Linguistics		South Mountain Community College
	FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (OFC)		Neil McCann
	Duncan Hosie	Merge
	Quasi Object		Small arms proliferation
	Clive McCay		I Wanna: The Remixes
	Christopher Columbus (TV series)		Subprime mortgage crisis
	View from the Window at Le Gras	Add sources
	Chief Financial Officer of Florida		List of Earth starships in Stargate
	Robert of Alençon		French Guiana national football team
	FF Scala		Stuart: A Life Backwards
	Paranthan	Wikify
	Amritapuri		Method Studios
	Puerto Castilla, Honduras		Hamid Karzai
	Janson		Dental braces
	Green Mountain Giant	Expand
	Akiéni		Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
	Richie George		Computer network
	Hideyo Arisaka		Game design

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!


Stubs		Cleanup
	Aliettite		St. Norbert College
	There Will Come Soft Rains		Barry Freundel
	Quasi Object		Deposit insurance
	Kerolite	Merge
	Amesite		Sepiolite
	Hideyo Arisaka		Subprime mortgage crisis
	Harriet Green		Small arms proliferation
	Euro Beach Soccer League	Add sources
	Onchocercidae		All-Star Squares
	Amritapuri		List of Earth starships in Stargate
	Green Mountain Giant		French Guiana national football team
	Clinohedrite	Wikify
	State Farm Territorial Cup Series		Hamid Karzai
	Zinnwaldite		Dental braces
	FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (OFC)		2013 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (AFC)
	Chapmanite	Expand
	Sonarika Bhadoria		Air Warrior (U.S. Army)
	Celadonite		Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
	Fraipontite		Computer network

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2013

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2013. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing

Featured content: Queen of France

WikiProject report: Puppies!

News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace

Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more

Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series

Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views

Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
84	French Guiana national football team (talk)	Add sources
5	St Giles Trust (talk)	Add sources
2,220	Hip hop (talk)	Add sources
33	Brockton High School (talk)	Add sources
18	Billy Miske (talk)	Add sources
52	Technology in Stargate (talk)	Add sources
20	Beta-titanium (talk)	Cleanup
55	Superhydrophobic coating (talk)	Cleanup
442	Link-local address (talk)	Cleanup
515	Koi No Yokan (talk)	Expand
1,798	Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (talk)	Expand
6,113	Computer network (talk)	Expand
166	Sun Life Financial (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,088	Stand-up comedy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
69	Fighter Mafia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
98	Doogh (talk)	Merge
17	Gives You Hell: The Remixes (talk)	Merge
17	I Wanna: The Remixes (talk)	Merge
12	Method Studios (talk)	Wikify
888	Hamid Karzai (talk)	Wikify
3	Desktop Theater (talk)	Wikify
2	Ashburtonite (talk)	Orphan
1	5 prime ureB sRNA (talk)	Orphan
5	Ballet in Downtown (talk)	Orphan
5	Robert of Alençon (talk)	Stub
20	Harriet Green (talk)	Stub
2	Chapmanite (talk)	Stub
3	Aliettite (talk)	Stub
3	Kerolite (talk)	Stub
7	Rodolfo Stange (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Op-ed: It's time to stop pretending the English-language Wikinews is a viable project

WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales

Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere

News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation Board appoints world expert in women's issues, global south

Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?

Featured content: The week of the birds

Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more

Merry Christmas!!

For all you do Monty. We need more Wikipedians like you :)

Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

ANI Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — T13 ( C • M • Click to learn how to view this signature as intended )

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
59	Bookman (typeface) (talk)	Add sources
7	St Giles Trust (talk)	Add sources
6	Verkhovyna (talk)	Add sources
33	Brockton High School (talk)	Add sources
6	Jewish National Front (talk)	Add sources
68	Superhydrophobic coating (talk)	Add sources
891	Hamid Karzai (talk)	Cleanup
475	Link-local address (talk)	Cleanup
25	Beta-titanium (talk)	Cleanup
2,116	Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (talk)	Expand
40	Contempt of Parliament (talk)	Expand
11	Ayhan Şahenk (talk)	Expand
174	Sun Life Financial (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20	International reactions to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
190	Shopify (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
54	Sepiolite (talk)	Merge
3,877	Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (talk)	Merge
15	I Wanna: The Remixes (talk)	Merge
1,888	Dental braces (talk)	Wikify
48	Lynch motor (talk)	Wikify
263	Greater Khorasan (talk)	Wikify
1	5 prime ureB sRNA (talk)	Orphan
2	Ashburtonite (talk)	Orphan
3	Gerry Czarnecki (talk)	Orphan
17	Harriet Green (talk)	Stub
4	Desktop Theater (talk)	Stub
7	Rodolfo Stange (talk)	Stub
3	Aliettite (talk)	Stub
11	Jose de Creeft (talk)	Stub
6	Kerolite (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

In the media: Wikipedia flamewars

WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion

Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more

News and notes: Wikivoyage turns ten, but where to now?; Wikipedia Zero expands into India

Traffic report: Gleeless

Featured content: Engineering and the arts

Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Protection policy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Protection policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Op-ed: The VisualEditor Beta and the path to change

Recent research: Napoleon, Michael Jackson and Srebrenica across cultures, 90% of Wikipedia better than Britannica, WikiSym preview

Traffic report: Bouncing Baby Brouhaha

WikiProject report: Babel Series: Politics on the Turkish Wikipedia

News and notes: Gearing up for Wikimania 2013

Arbitration report: Race and politics case closes

Featured content: Caterpillars, warblers, and frogs—oh my!

Discussion report: Defining consensus; VisualEditor default state; expert and layperson terms in article titles

Block of User:Psgm

How come you only blocked them for a day? Every single edit they've made has been vandalism and/or disruptive. Every single one. They should be indeffed, with talk page access removed (since they rant about things there as well) as a vandalism-only account - because that's what they are. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

In my opinion, User:Psgm doesn't seem like a vandal, but instead, at least to me, looks like someone who has strongly held beliefs. Their edits are disruptive, and they have been edit warring, but I do not believe they are editing in bad faith, which I think is a perquisite to indef them at this point. In all likelihood, they will resume their disruption after the edit warring block, and will likely escalate to a long or indef block, but I think we need to go through the motions on this account. If you would like to start a discussion on one of the notice boards about going for a longer block now, feel free, but I'm not inclined to extend it. Monty ₈₄₅ 15:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

On the contrary, as their edits are clearly targeting the group they don't like, and are trying to belittle them regularly, I'd say that's textbook bad faith. I'm not going to file an ANI case now; I just hope that when they do resume their disruption, that they get indeffed then. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:32, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

List of incidents/List of violent incidents

Hi Monty,

there was a mistake. "List of incidents .." and "List of violents incidents.." were the wrong names. "List of violent incidents .." is the correct name. Thanks anyway. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 07:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Overdue closures of FFD debates

Thanks so much for closing some of the old FFD debates at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 23. Well done. Only two left, and we'll be caught up through mid-June! (The Redshirt and PatternForce ones are legitimately tough ones to call, and I'm kind of glad I can't do it myself, having voted there already.) All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 13:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

AIV: Thoriq Azka Rahmat

Hi. Just FYI, regarding this case at AIV: The username given was the sockmaster. I should have highlighted the fact that one of the puppets – User:Thoriq Dhiyaan Azka Rahmat – was the account that was currently active (though I did mention the time of the last edit was 7 hours prior). In any case, the SPI case was processed, the socks indefd, and the master blocked for 2 weeks, so problem solved (for now). —[AlanM1(talk)]— 16:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape case

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape case. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Munier Raychouni

Could you please re-delete this article. Less than twenty-four hours after your deleting it, the article was recreated by a user who I suspect of being a sockpuppet. The article is not substantively different from the version you deleted, and is still unsourced. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Deleted it G5, interestingly, there doesn't seem to be a CSD criteria for a recreated BLPPROD with the same problem, I'm not sure what the result would have been if it wasn't a very likely a sock. Monty ₈₄₅ 13:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,632	South Asia (talk)	Add sources
1,346	T-34 (talk)	Add sources
55	Technology in Stargate (talk)	Add sources
970	Lie (talk)	Add sources
21	Nochex (talk)	Add sources
68	Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre (talk)	Add sources
21	Robert Malcolm (talk)	Cleanup
480	James Rolfe (filmmaker) (talk)	Cleanup
205	Deposit insurance (talk)	Cleanup
380	State Farm Insurance (talk)	Expand
31	Giambattista Bodoni (talk)	Expand
8	Medieval history of Sri Lanka (talk)	Expand
36	Publication history of Wonder Woman (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8	Graham Spiers (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	Opposition to the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
125	West Side Highway (talk)	Merge
13	The Wind Blows: The Remixes (talk)	Merge
14	Gives You Hell: The Remixes (talk)	Merge
29	Peer production (talk)	Wikify
33	2013 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (AFC) (talk)	Wikify
4	Vehicle registration plates of Sri Lanka (talk)	Wikify
5	Ballet in Downtown (talk)	Orphan
4	ADK Assault Rifle (talk)	Orphan
4	Mohammad Yousuf Taing (talk)	Orphan
6	P2P Foundation (talk)	Stub
20	Varick Street (talk)	Stub
1	Chapmanite (talk)	Stub
3	Francis Bird (talk)	Stub
26	Greenwich Street (talk)	Stub
13	Jemima Wilkinson (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Arbitration report: Fourteen editors proposed for ban in Tea Party movement case

Traffic report: Greetings from the graveyard

News and notes: Chapters Association self-destructs

WikiProject report: WikiProject Freedom of Speech

Featured content: Mysterious case of the grand duchess

Discussion report: CheckUser and Oversighter candidates, and more

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Closing discussions

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Closing discussions. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

A discussion you closed has been reopened

Groan. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches

In the media: Chinese censorship

Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities

Special report: Jimmy Wales: media favors entertainment over raising public awareness

Discussion report: Wikivoyage, reliable sources, music bands, account creators, and OTRS

WikiProject report: For the love of stamps

Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No legal threats

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No legal threats. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
96	Snoopy's siblings (talk)	Add sources
51	Earth technology in Stargate (talk)	Add sources
10	Pokuttya (talk)	Add sources
49	Fixedsys (talk)	Add sources
1,252	Greenwich Village (talk)	Add sources
82	Ancient technology in Stargate (talk)	Add sources
4	Haciendo El Amor Con La Ropa (talk)	Cleanup
192	Politics of Nigeria (talk)	Cleanup
48	Jean-Claude Darcheville (talk)	Cleanup
92	Overconsumption (talk)	Expand
30	Peter and the Sword of Mercy (talk)	Expand
12	Nickelodeon (Malaysia) (talk)	Expand
8	Gerald M. Steinberg (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
53	Muthuraja (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
47	Fighter Mafia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19,488	Pacific Rim (film) (talk)	Merge
89	Doogh (talk)	Merge
35	Identification (information) (talk)	Merge
2	Los Kambumbos: Tierra De Nadie (talk)	Wikify
3	Nasir Uddin (anthropologist) (talk)	Wikify
396	Invisalign (talk)	Wikify
1	Galician Assembly (talk)	Orphan
0	Aleksandrs Kokarevs (talk)	Orphan
4	Real Matters, Inc. (talk)	Orphan
18	Samana Cay (talk)	Stub
1	Fraipontite (talk)	Stub
26	Francisco de Bobadilla (talk)	Stub
6	Thomas William Cowan (talk)	Stub
2	De Nobili School, Sijua (talk)	Stub
10	Year Round (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

Traffic report: Reddit creep

Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Consensus

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Consensus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Recent protection

I noticed you recently protected the Cash Money Records page for a few days and I do appreciate it. However, the fact that it has been protected nine times since 2010, and earlier this year for a month, just a short while ago. I believe the article warrants a longer protection than just a few days. But, that is just my humble opinion. STATic message me! 03:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your probably right about a longer term protection, I was really only looking at the one editor. Do you think long term PC after the semi-protection expires would be sufficient? Monty ₈₄₅ 04:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

That would seem to be okay since the vandalism has not been too crazy recently, but I just would not want it to get to the point where every IP edit is getting rejected, and it becomes tedious to reject them all. STATic message me! 00:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Wikipedians

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Wikipedians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:16, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

In the media: Chelsea Manning, Box-office predictors, and 'Storming Wikipedia'

Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective

WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks

Traffic report: Reddit creep

Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland

News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments

Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
91	Devrek (talk)	Add sources
16	Boar's Nest (talk)	Add sources
69	PNY Technologies (talk)	Add sources
1,885	The Dukes of Hazzard (talk)	Add sources
401	Mizrahi Jews (talk)	Add sources
107	Capitol Records Building (talk)	Add sources
10	Bristol-Plymouth Regional Technical School (talk)	Cleanup
1,593	American Express (talk)	Cleanup
137	Tenchu: Shadow Assassins (talk)	Cleanup
103	WΔZ (talk)	Expand
8	Esther Arroyo (talk)	Expand
11	Ferdinand de la Cerda (talk)	Expand
213	DeKalb County School District (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
57	Shermy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4	Beanstalks and Bad Eggs (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3,026	ARM architecture (talk)	Merge
495	Indo-Aryan languages (talk)	Merge
2,423	Gundam (talk)	Merge
35	Wonder Woman (Earth-Two) (talk)	Wikify
141	Killzone: Liberation (talk)	Wikify
16	Geriatric dentistry (talk)	Wikify
5	POI v The Person Known as “Lina” (talk)	Orphan
1	Astratijs Roškovs (talk)	Orphan
2	Luv Puri (talk)	Orphan
33	Crocodile Shoes (talk)	Stub
44	Eliomar Correia Silva (talk)	Stub
25	The Dukes of Hazzard: Return of the General Lee (talk)	Stub
25	Coy Duke (talk)	Stub
32	Cletus Hogg (talk)	Stub
68	Byron Cherry (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

In the media: Manning "put back in the closet"; State involvement in Azerbaijani Wikipedia

News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up

Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds

Discussion report: Arbcom election procedures, Wiki Loves Monuments, Privacy policy, FDC, and more

Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt

WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia

Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion

Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible

2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round

No, you are absolutely wrong I were not involved in any edit war!!--Muj745 (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

1 revert 2 reverts 3 reverts of the same content in under 20 minutes. I didn't even count your initial revert, which as there was an ongoing edit war involving other editors, rightfully would count as well. How is that not an edit war? I'm issuing warnings to put a stop to it. Just don't edit to add live scores there again till the dispute is resolved on the talk page, and you will be fine. Monty ₈₄₅ 17:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank You!

Hello, Thank You for the heads up about three revertings. I didn't know about that rule. Skyblueshaun (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your warning

I have been warned by you that I will be blocked if I dont stop edit warring. I have been live updating this page 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round, and even though I have repeatedly asked those that doesnt agree it should be lived updated to post their arguments here, nothing have happened before I get this warning: User talk:Jack Bornholm#September 2013]] Is this fair? As I have stated before I started live updating: "Also see Template:Match in progress. Since consensus have not yet changed this template have not been erased" My comments are to be found on the talkpage Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round#Live scoring. I and others have been updating live scores for years to FIFA and UEFA tournaments. Why should Africa be different? We should have the same rights as anyone else. Jack Bornholm (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

With very few exceptions, edit warring is not an acceptable solution, even if your right on policy. In this case, there isn't even a clear policy outcome. Your right that the template is still there, but there are also strong WP:NOTNEWS arguments on the other side. I don't personally have an opinion on the underlying matter, other then that the edit warring needs to stop. Monty ₈₄₅ 18:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit War

If you have proof of me edit warring then go ahead, however as you know full well i have not edit warred so its inappropriate for you to post such a message on my talk page. One edit is not an edit war and is not in use of three revert rule. Inserting live scores is not allowed on this site. Blethering Scot 17:59, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm just trying to stop the edit war from continuing. Certainly you wouldn't get blocked for that one edit, however, as I just got the previous person who had been extensively edit warring to remove live scores from the article to stop, I was trying to stop it from resuming with you in their place. It may seem like mincing words, but while you may not have been edit warring, you did become involved in the edit war by continuing the course of it. Monty ₈₄₅ 18:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Whatever.Blethering Scot 18:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Evidence phase open - Manning naming dispute

Dear Monty845.

This is just a quick courtesy notice. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 19, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Seddon ^talk 23:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete Request Userpage: Nico Situma

I can confirm receipt of your message via private email and wish to confirm that I DID request deletion of my userpage. Regards, NS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.155.58.197 (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

If you did get the email, then you can do a password recovery on the account, and add a {{db-u1}} tag to the userpage using the recovered account. That would save some time. Monty ₈₄₅ 18:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Recent move

Want to thank you very much for your help to move Trema (dab...) over the Trema redirect. Joys! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 05:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Orthodox Christianity in Taiwan dispute

Thank you, Monty. I have left a note on the article's talk page. Perhaps whoever is considering locking the site would be interested. I have more material (including Greek sources), but will hold off on adding them. Dawud (talk) 05:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

In the media: Lawyer goes to court to discover Wikipedian's identity; Storming Wikipedia; Wikimedia UK Secretary in conflict-of-interest controversy; Does Wikipedia need a "right to reply" box?

WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia

Featured content: Tintin goes featured

News and notes: As deadline approaches, Individual Engagement Grants looks for ideas

Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!

Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes

Hadene065

This user continues to make unconstructive edits and deletions to BLP and the worst part is that they have a lot of edits to check. Maybe it's time for another time-out? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Monty ₈₄₅

The Progressive Barnstar

		The Progressive Barnstar
		I couldn't find a barnstar that would adequately thank those involved in making the template editor user right RFC a reality, so I created this new one. The Progressive Barnstar recognizes those courageous enough to work towards a vision for change at Wikipedia. Monty845, your countless technical and procedural insights and ongoing support and input during both the drafting and live discussion of this proposal helped facilitate broad acceptance in an area that's caused such division in the past. I consider it a success at this point, no matter what the eventual outcome, and I thank you. equazcion ^(talk) 06:28, 18 Sep 2013 (UTC)

The Alexis Reich move discussion closure

In your explanation of the move closure you stated, "Both sides of the argument have policy based justifications for their positions." I am wondering if that assessment is based on the fact that both sides have claimed policy based justifications and you just assumed that those claims are valid or if you actually checked out those policy based claims. Since you closed the discussion 15 minutes after becoming aware of it, it seems to me unlikely that you did check. But if some editors are misrepresenting what policies actually say then to give the mere mention of a policy weight is not to make a proper assessment of the arguments.

BLP was often mentioned and you said "the BLP arguments are not in favor of moving", but no one in the discussion could quote a single sentence from BLP that supported their position despite repeated requests that they do so. It is easy to say "policy X, Y, and Z all support my view", but when evaluating the arguments someone has to actually check to see if this is correct or else any discussion can be derailed by people randomly dropping an alphabet soup of policy names, regardless of whether or not they speak to the matter. 99.192.89.57 (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC) (=99.192....)

I'd actually been following it since yesterday morning. I didn't close it then as it was new enough that I felt it needed more time to see if it was headed towards a consensus. Be assured, I spent more then 15 minutes looking at it. WP:BLP is a broad policy, and there is plenty in there that could be used to support the don't move side. Editors made specific references to the dignity argument, which is specifically mentioned in the BLP policy. There are varied interpretations on how BLP is supposed to apply in this sort of situation, the arguments made in the RM are definitely one of them. In this context, it is not for me to say whether they are interpreting BLP policy correctly or not, that their arguments are rooted in an interpretation of policy with significant support is enough to not discount them when evaluating the move consensus. Monty ₈₄₅ 17:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I apologize for my assumption that you only spent 15 minutes on the decision. I based that on noticing how long it was between the formal request being posted on the admin noticeborad and the closure. 99.192.89.57 (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2013 (UTC) (=99.192....)

No problem, I totally understand how you could have come to that interpretation. Monty ₈₄₅ 17:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

	The Admin's Barnstar
	I thereby award you with this Admin's Barnstar for your well-executed closure of the Alexis Reich move request. Your actions were both bold and correct, to the betterment of the encyclopedia. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
167	Boss Hogg (talk)	Add sources
2	Bleecker Street Line (talk)	Add sources
159	Hippolyta (DC Comics) (talk)	Add sources
36	Beat Down: Fists of Vengeance (talk)	Add sources
21	Indus Valley School of Art and Architecture (talk)	Add sources
68	Noha (talk)	Add sources
1,954	Robert Lewandowski (talk)	Cleanup
885	Rockchip (talk)	Cleanup
484	Donna Troy (talk)	Cleanup
48	Gang injunction (talk)	Expand
198	Wraith (Stargate) (talk)	Expand
2	Sundby, Copenhagen (talk)	Expand
129	Subprime crisis impact timeline (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	History of the French line of succession (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,431	Life insurance (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33	Cooter Davenport (talk)	Merge
135	Sheriff Rosco P. Coltrane (talk)	Merge
29	Goa'uld technology in Stargate (talk)	Merge
6	E. V. Day (talk)	Wikify
512	University of South Florida (talk)	Wikify
19	2001–02 Scottish Premier League (talk)	Wikify
1	Roberts Pakalns (talk)	Orphan
4	Shinhan Bank Canada (talk)	Orphan
14	Barry Habib (talk)	Orphan
9	United States Senate election in Alaska, 1996 (talk)	Stub
92	Monique Ganderton (talk)	Stub
451	Dylan Neal (talk)	Stub
40	Reynaldo dos Santos Silva (talk)	Stub
4	Amesite (talk)	Stub
110	Christopher Mayer (American actor) (talk)	Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Redundant warning?

I'm assuming you overlooked this notification which came before the report was filed, but this was rather unnecessary given that a warning had just been placed on my talk page, which was removed and therefore acknowledged. The edit-warring notification, the edit-warrior noticeboard notification, and then another edit-warring notification is a bit of overkill, especially in the span of only a few minutes. - Aoidh (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to make sure that you got a full, unambiguous edit warring warning. Though your right, getting reported to the noticeboard does let you know someone thought you were edit warring. If you think my extra warning was overkill, I apologize. My chief concern is only that the edit warring stop. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't intend to edit war further regarding the tag (I didn't realize it had happened that much until it was pointed out), but it appears that the report was made as an attempt to game the system, as the filer then immediately proceeded to continue to edit war to place the reorder the AfD. Now notifying me of edit-warring clearly demonstrates that they themselves are aware of it, so I can't see any other reason to file an edit warring report and then immediately continue to edit war other than to try to game the system to get their way. - Aoidh (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Now the editor is attempting to use that as some kind of badge of shame at the AfD. I've removed it because it's entirely inappropriate and has no purpose at AfD and is disruptive more than anything. - Aoidh (talk) 05:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I agree that had no place in the AfD. I will try to keep an eye on it, though I wont be on much longer tonight. Monty ₈₄₅ 05:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Please help. Reverts continue.

Monty, User:Aoidh has reversed my edits (now on the Chakra talk-page) again. Please assist. Relevant links: [[1]], [2], [3]

In dealing with User:Aoidh I may not have been a Saint but I have—as the records will show—made repeated attempts to engage other editors throughout. I invited other editors to offer feed back on the Chakra talk-page both directly on the page and on the pages of the relevant WikiProjects (i.e. WikiProject Linux. WikiProject Free Software, WikiProject Software, WikiProject Computing). While User:Aoidh was composing a submission to WP:AfD, I was adding WP:RfC tags to the talk-page in an attempt to draw in broader community feedback.[4]. Yes I eventually started getting snarky. Yes I've made some quick reverts of reverts. Yes I'm human. But I've tried. I've tried to encourage a collective process in the face of repeated unilateral actions by a single editor.

At this point if you want to just lump it all together and ban both of us (kevjonesin and Aoidh) for a bit, I'll accept that. I can't say that I'd consider it completely fair, but at least it would be pragmatic and allow the current Chakra discussions to proceed unmolested for awhile.

Sincerely,

--Kevjonesin (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

This comment seems to sum up why Kevjonesin is continuing to insert this anywhere he can; not because it's relevant to the article, but rather so that "anyone else who finds themselves feeling bullied by you, User:Aoidh, should have documentation of the edit warring complaint readily available so as to avoid future ambibuity as to whether you are aware of WP:3RR." Articles talk pages do not exist so that editors can "document" the behavior of others under the guise of, ironically, "feeling bullied". As I told Kevjonesin multiple times, there are appropriate venues for such concerns (WP:ANI and WP:RFC/U for example), but an article's talk page is not one of them. Continuing to reinsert this irrelevant "notice" on an article's talk page is bordering on harassment, and should not be tolerated. - Aoidh (talk) 11:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

News and notes: Third time's the charm: the FDC's newest round of funding requests

WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall

Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh

Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?

Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Redundant warning?

I'm assuming you overlooked this notification which came before the report was filed, but this was rather unnecessary given that a warning had just been placed on my talk page, which was removed and therefore acknowledged. The edit-warring notification, the edit-warrior noticeboard notification, and then another edit-warring notification is a bit of overkill, especially in the span of only a few minutes. - Aoidh (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to make sure that you got a full, unambiguous edit warring warning. Though your right, getting reported to the noticeboard does let you know someone thought you were edit warring. If you think my extra warning was overkill, I apologize. My chief concern is only that the edit warring stop. Monty ₈₄₅ 04:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't intend to edit war further regarding the tag (I didn't realize it had happened that much until it was pointed out), but it appears that the report was made as an attempt to game the system, as the filer then immediately proceeded to continue to edit war to place the reorder the AfD. Now notifying me of edit-warring clearly demonstrates that they themselves are aware of it, so I can't see any other reason to file an edit warring report and then immediately continue to edit war other than to try to game the system to get their way. - Aoidh (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Now the editor is attempting to use that as some kind of badge of shame at the AfD. I've removed it because it's entirely inappropriate and has no purpose at AfD and is disruptive more than anything. - Aoidh (talk) 05:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I agree that had no place in the AfD. I will try to keep an eye on it, though I wont be on much longer tonight. Monty ₈₄₅ 05:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Please help. Reverts continue.

Monty, User:Aoidh has reversed my edits (now on the Chakra talk-page) again. Please assist. Relevant links: [[5]], [6], [7]

In dealing with User:Aoidh I may not have been a Saint but I have—as the records will show—made repeated attempts to engage other editors throughout. I invited other editors to offer feed back on the Chakra talk-page both directly on the page and on the pages of the relevant WikiProjects (i.e. WikiProject Linux. WikiProject Free Software, WikiProject Software, WikiProject Computing). While User:Aoidh was composing a submission to WP:AfD, I was adding WP:RfC tags to the talk-page in an attempt to draw in broader community feedback.[8]. Yes I eventually started getting snarky. Yes I've made some quick reverts of reverts. Yes I'm human. But I've tried. I've tried to encourage a collective process in the face of repeated unilateral actions by a single editor.

At this point if you want to just lump it all together and ban both of us (kevjonesin and Aoidh) for a bit, I'll accept that. I can't say that I'd consider it completely fair, but at least it would be pragmatic and allow the current Chakra discussions to proceed unmolested for awhile.

Sincerely,

--Kevjonesin (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

This comment seems to sum up why Kevjonesin is continuing to insert this anywhere he can; not because it's relevant to the article, but rather so that "anyone else who finds themselves feeling bullied by you, User:Aoidh, should have documentation of the edit warring complaint readily available so as to avoid future ambibuity as to whether you are aware of WP:3RR." Articles talk pages do not exist so that editors can "document" the behavior of others under the guise of, ironically, "feeling bullied". As I told Kevjonesin multiple times, there are appropriate venues for such concerns (WP:ANI and WP:RFC/U for example), but an article's talk page is not one of them. Continuing to reinsert this irrelevant "notice" on an article's talk page is bordering on harassment, and should not be tolerated. - Aoidh (talk) 11:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

News and notes: Third time's the charm: the FDC's newest round of funding requests

WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall

Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh

Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?

Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV