User talk:Monster eagle

Image tagging for Image:770-810 INDIA PalaEmpire.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:770-810 INDIA PalaEmpire.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fort William

Dear user, your edits on Fort William have been reverted. Although your contribution is appreciated, this page is not the place for that information. Please note that this page is a disambiguation page for many forts called Fort William. The content you provided would go to Fort William, India, where there is already an article with a fair amount of data. Do not delete the content on the disambiguation page. If a link somewhere in wikipedia took you there, then correct the link on that page to the correct Fort William. See WP:D for the wikipedia guidlines on these types of pages. Happy editing. Aboutmovies 16:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Calcutta_Port-1787.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Calcutta_Port-1787.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi! Thanks for uploading images, especially related to Kolkata. Could you please specify the sources of the image, otherwise those could be questioned. For example, the old port images/Howrah bridge images, you should cite the source (the US GI photo collection). Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A large chunk of those images are from this site. See the image page of Image:HooglyKolkata1945.jpg to understand the copyright status of these images. You can just do copy-paste of the information regarding the other photos.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bangla Wikipedia

Hi Sandipan, Have you looked into the Bengali version of Wikipedia? You can visit it at http://bn.wikipedia.org . We need more Bengalis, especially those from West Bengal, to work on the articles there. Right now, we have 15400+ articles, but many of them could benefit from more volunteers.

You only need to have unicode fonts enabled in your machine to see Bangla. We have integrated Bangla phonetic typing into the edit windows there, so no extra software is needed for typing.

Hope to see you there. Thanks. --Ragib 08:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howrah Bridge image

Hi! Thanks for asking. Well, usually images are placed in a right-alligned manner, often left alligned, and rarely centrally (unless it is a panorama image - with much more width relative to height). This is usual in wikipedia (though not a rule). That's why I right-alligned the image. Regarding the size, I removed size specification from the images, because that would allow reader's preference to work. Readrers' preference is the size at which the end-user's computer is set to view images. You can choose your "preference" by clicking "My prefernce" that hovers on the right upper corner of Wikipedia screen. Under "Files" option of "My Preferences" is the option for chosing your preferred image size and resolution. Not specifying the image size is helpful because it allows the wiki software to justify paragraphs/article structure/appearence suitably to every user. Otherwise some user may find some image is obstructing the flow of text. Still, some images need size-specifications sometimes. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

Go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. Register. Upload files. Be careful about licensing. That's it. Will talk in detail later. Am in extreme hurry today. Got an exam tomorrow :(--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi! I again happened to log in and saw the changes you made in India. India is a featured article (and also a sensitive article!), and it is better to discuss in its talk page if you plan to make any major change in the article. You will see in the talk page of India detailed discussion/disputes on the content, including images. So please declare/discuss edits you make in the article, including the rationale. Also, the article India is highly summarised, with proper links to appropriate daughter articles, like History of India, Geography of India etc. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Despite best of intentions, one can land up with disbalancing the article! For example, a few days back, I added a reference to the Revolutionary movement for Indian independence in the "History" section and declared it in the talk page. The addition was soon responded by others that it should be externally referenced, as the sentence reads as if Congress and revolutionary groups were equally involved in the independence movement. So far, I have not been able to produce any reference, and the addition now faces reversion. I am telling you this because it is a very sensitive article, with huge internet traffic. So every change should be carefully placed. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to India page

Dear MonsterEagle, Thanks for your contribution to the India page, which regrettably has been reversed. Please discuss discuss them on the Talk:India page first. Please also read: Talk:India#Edit_in_.22History.22_section and Summary of Request for Comment in late January. The latter link lays out some reasons why it is preferred that any forthcoming changes to the India article (a featured article and "flagship" article for the India portal) be discussed on the article's talk page first. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 12:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Calcutta Port-1945 01.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Calcutta Port-1945 01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ragib (talk) 01:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Central Calcutta after Rain.jpg

File:Central Calcutta after Rain.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Central Calcutta after Rain.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Central Calcutta after Rain.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mont Vert Tropez

The article Mont Vert Tropez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No credible assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 01:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Monster eagle (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mont Vert Tropez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mont Vert Tropez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mont Vert Tropez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CESC Limited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhenkanal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Monster eagle (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bandel Thermal Power Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of power stations in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electricity sector in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of dams and reservoirs in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurangabad District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Monster eagle. All or some of your addition(s) to Varunastra (Torpedo) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Your addition to Nuclear power in India has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Monster eagle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian locomotive class WAP-4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orissa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Monster eagle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Monster eagle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]