Jump to content

User talk:Monir1975

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Zytereditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was User:Zytereditor/sandbox, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 20:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Zytereditor. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to User:Zytereditor/sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Zytereditor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Zytereditor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

You MUST disclose paid editing. You are WISE to treat editing on behalf of others as if it were paid editing even if it is not.

If you have ANY connection to the company Zyter or are editing on behalf or at the direction of someone who does, you should edit as if you are a paid editor.

If you do not, then your username is deceptive and you need to change it. Please read WP:Username policy and WP:Changing username for details.

In any case, you have a clear conflict of interest.

By the way, thank you for your message on User talk:Tmmonir explaining that you are editing at the request of someone else but are not paid.[1] davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 20:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid drafts that sound like ads, they will be deleted

[edit]

Another editor's attempts to write about the company Zyter were deleted because the sounded like ads. Your sandbox, User:Zytereditor/sandbox, also qualifies for deletion under the speedy deletion of spam criteria. I highly recommend replacing it with a generic sandbox for now. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 20:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should put a filled-out version of this on the talk page of any draft you compose related to this topic, and on the talk page of any article which you request an edit of if it is related to this topic. It goes in the top section of the talk page, below any "WikiProject" templates. See Template:Connected contributor (paid) for details. See Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Connected_contributor_(paid) for a list of article talk pages that use (transclude) this template. I recommend putting {{paid}} on your user page, User:Zytereditor. Instructions for that template can be found at Template:Paid. Examples of user pages that use it can be found at Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Paid - look for page names that start with User: and which have the word (transclusion) after the name of the user. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Followup: {{paid}} needs parameters. See the examples in Template:Paid for details. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zytereditor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Zytereditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:User SandboxTest

[edit]

I'm not sure what you were attempting to test, but Template:User SandboxTest isn't really the place for it. You may be interested in reading Help:A quick guide to templates. I've deleted your test. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@[User:Hammersoft], thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zyter (January 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is more a brag page of awards and accolades rather than providing secondary source coverage of the company.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 16:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI username notice

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Zytereditor", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 16:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@user:AngusWOOF, user name change is requested as per your recommendation. Thank you for pointing it out.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Zytereditor (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Govil (January 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Govil (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Govil (2nd nomination), please do not resubmit unless there is additional in-depth coverage that has taken place since the recent deletion.
CNMall41 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Govil (2nd nomination). Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I know you've attempted to make paid statements and then removed them [2][3]. With that in mind, we need to be clear as to the situation. Thus, I'm placing the following notice...

Information icon

Hello Monir1975. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Monir1975. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Monir1975|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft, Niether directly or indirectly, I am not expecting any compensation, the reason why I removed "paid" tag as its bothered me much. Previusly, I added "paid" tag since it was recommneded an earlier state and thought, writing article would treat as paid as who will know it free. I would appreciate, if you could poit me out,

how can I be a free/independent editor, how can I make you belief this as free and don't want to call myself as paid editor. I have been working on this quite a while to write Draft:Zyter as neutral point of view and let me know if I can proceed further.Monir1975 (talk) 13:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am not going to mark the {{Help me-helped}} tag as answered, as I think it might do to have another set of eyes on this. What I see is this; you've been here for a month and a half. You've made 177 edits. To date, near as I can tell, every single one of your edits has been trying to get an article about Zyter or Sanjay Govil published. This is the very definition of a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account, and calls into question your reason for being here. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion, and you need to read carefully and follow our conflict of interest guideline. I am also still very concerned about your statement here. Having a co-worker ask you to do something strikes me as a task being done for pay. There is a muddled picture here about your reason for being here and whether you are attempting to promote this person and company. My response to you here still holds true. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft, Alright, not helping me here. Please just delete my account. No longer going to edit this anymore. Thank you! appreciated your response. Monir1975 (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way Sanjay Govil that you mentioned which had been requested by me to delete and its deleted. There will not be any editing from me about that person. Also how can I revoke this statement "here" and get rid of muddled picture area???

Monir1975 (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • You aren't required to not contribute here on things with which you have a conflict of interest. Editing drafts and talk pages with regards to such subjects is fine, which is what you have been doing. If you want people to have more faith in your editing here as being in support of the project rather than in support of Zyter, then you should feel free to edit in subject areas where you don't have a conflict of interest, and are genuinely interested in aiding the project. Your contributions would be most welcome. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zyter

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Monir1975. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zyter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zyter

[edit]

Hello, Monir1975. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zyter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Monir1975&oldid=1088231892"