User talk:Molandfreak/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Molandfreak. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Nick Fuentes
Please refrain from reverting pages without a stated cause or reason, as you've recently done to my contribution to the Nick Fuentes articles. It seems as though this is being done in bad faith. —User:Gottretteunsalle
- White supremacists like you and Fuentes never act in good faith. Stop trying to add your weasel words to make the article fit your narrative and go by what reliable sources say. You cannot say a single tweet "repeatedly denies" allegations, for example.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 05:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- You've demonstrated a clear lack of civility, labeling me a White Supremacists despite knowing quite literally nothing about me as an individual. I left all controversial, racist, or otherwise reprehensible statements made by Fuentes in the article, merely reformatting them to meet Wikipedia standards. I did not and have not advocated on Nicks behalf. You are clearly biased, and as such should abstain from vandalizing the article lest moderation get involved.
—User:Gottretteunsalle —Preceding undated comment added 05:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Good. The moderators will side with me. See the articles for Stefan Molyneux, Faith Goldy, Lauren Southern, James Allsup and others. They all go by what the sources say, with very little interjections for rebuttal from self-published sources. The opposite is true of your revision of the article. Sorry reality has a bias you're uncomfortable with.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 06:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- I urge you to point out where the information presented is factually incorrect. His controversial, oftentimes bigoted viewpoints are on full display, as is the joke he made in allusion to Holocaust denial. I think you'd find we agree on far more than we disagree if you bothered to listen. I'd consider myself a socialist but you've taken the liberty of assuming I am a white supremacist neo nazi simply because I do not hold your vandalism of my contribution in high regard. The article is still being written and contributed to, obviously it isn't perfect nor final. Deleting the additions made is simply destructive and unreasonable.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Molandfreak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
'''[[User:Molandfreak|<font color="green">Molandfreak</font>]] [[User talk:Molandfreak|<font color="orange">(talk,</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Molandfreak|<font color="red">contribs,</font>]] [[Special:EmailUser/Molandfreak|email)]]''': Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email)
to
'''[[User:Molandfreak|<span style="color: green">Molandfreak</span>]] [[User talk:Molandfreak|<span style="color: orange">(talk,</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Molandfreak|<span style="color: red">contribs,</span>]] [[Special:EmailUser/Molandfreak|email)]]''': Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email)
—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Ho-Chunk Nation
I see you've been adding the Ho-Chunk Nation to various county list of municipality templates... While I can't speak to the accuracy of most of your edits, I'm a bit skeptical that Cook County, IL, has a reservation in it. Cursory research shows that the Ho-Chunk bought land down in Lynwood (admittedly, not a part of the county with which I'm familiar) intending to build a casino-resort (since unbuilt, due to the recession), but is it technically a reservation? Do you have a source that can provide some clarity for me? Do the Feds consider it a reservation? Paris1127 (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Paris1127-- Indeed, it seems I made a mistake. When I edited the article I was under the impression that the land had been approved as off-reservation trust land, which doesn't seem to be the case. The Census Bureau has maps based on 2010 data, so I will soon re-edit the article and the templates based on that information. --Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 08:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- OK, great. Thanks for clarifying. There appears to be a sports complex down there named for the tribe, but that's it for now. Casino looks doubtful (already several around Chicago; none of them Indian, although several are Indiana), but I don't know if such an establishment would count as reservation land. Paris1127 (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Poccknñ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Poccknñ. Since you had some involvement with the Poccknñ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Molandfreak. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ROLLBACKERS PLEASE STOP!
THIS TIME WE DONT NEED NEUTRALITY! OR YOU WANT THAT THERE WILL NOT BE ANY WIKIPEDIA ANYMORE? SYOP ROLLBACKING MY EDIT WITH THE TRUTH ABOUT THE COPYSTRIKERS FROM EU! if you block me, this means that you are for a dictatorship. DO you want a dictator? 89.225.133.27 (talk)
- Please read this carefully: "The proposal makes explicit that this does not include private cloud storage services, non-profit encyclopedias (such as Wikipedia), non-profit educational or scientific repositories, nor a variety of other cases." August-54 (talk) 08:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Anyway, its censorship machine and its not fair AT ALL. You use youtube too, rollbackers, and you dont want too the dictatorship! 89.225.133.27 (talk)
Welcome to WP:STiki!
|
Hello, Molandfreak, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC) |
|
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
Rave Dubin listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rave Dubin. Since you had some involvement with the Rave Dubin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 18:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Discretionary sanctions notice for post 1932 American politics and related people
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 06:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Nick Fuentes
You need to take your content/source article to the talk page, and drop the discussion of other editors. Doug Weller talk 19:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: Noted. I'm just going to stop editing the article altogether, anyway. Admittedly I got a bit heated when dealing with another editor earlier on my own talk page, and I'm willing to accept a block if it's deemed a harsh enough violation of WP:CIVIL.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Just don't repeat it, you can get one free pass. :-) And as I told the other editor, the article might be deleted anyway. If not there are processes for dispute resolution. I haven't even looked carefully at the details of the dispute, just its existence so I can't comment on it. Doug Weller talk 19:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Template:Hate in Canada
Hello, I've noticed that you restored the "Proponents of Hate" section in the Template "Hate in Canada." Because this section is an obvious violation of WP:BLP, I've removed it. There is a discussion on the talk page for the template if you want to discuss further. May His Shadow Fall Upon You ● 📧 22:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Jennifer Lee
Let me tell you about Jennifer Lee, she's REALLY destroying the competition. Just tell the world to pull the advertising of Frozen II! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:197:C181:B70:C880:CC46:F1D8:1D71 (talk) 20:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Democratic primary
Don't edit war. Don't revert without explanation. Use the talk page. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 00:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't remove Pete based on personal opinion. I removed him because you had both Pete and Warren under the
delegate3 =parameter. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 00:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)- @Nice4What: I didn’t mean to imply that you were editing the template with a political bias—I’m certainly not either since Pete Buttigieg wasn’t my favorite candidate. But the template is not meant to document the current state of the election only. It’s meant to document the important bits of the election for the future. Candidates who win 5% or more of the popular vote, or who win at least one state, are entitled to a spot in the infobox. Look at the templates for the 2004 Democratic Party primaries and the 2008 Republican Party primaries as examples.—Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 00:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Appreciate your response, thanks! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 01:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Nice4What: I didn’t mean to imply that you were editing the template with a political bias—I’m certainly not either since Pete Buttigieg wasn’t my favorite candidate. But the template is not meant to document the current state of the election only. It’s meant to document the important bits of the election for the future. Candidates who win 5% or more of the popular vote, or who win at least one state, are entitled to a spot in the infobox. Look at the templates for the 2004 Democratic Party primaries and the 2008 Republican Party primaries as examples.—Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 00:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Webb County, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guerrero Municipality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Update tags in Municipalities of Baja California
I had to revert your update tags because although the census has begun, results are not yet released, and will likely take at least 6 months, so the update date is not appropriate yet. Mattximus (talk)
- @Mattximus: Sorry for the confusion, but I placed the tags because San Quintín Municipality was created, and the article doesn't reflect that yet.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 16:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- I see, I think that will be reflected in the new census in a few months, but I can see if I can add it in some way. Mattximus (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. In retrospect I probably should have just added the information in myself, but I didn't see a creation date on the Spanish Wiki page, so I left it hoping someone would have a source on that.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 16:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- I see, I think that will be reflected in the new census in a few months, but I can see if I can add it in some way. Mattximus (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ok I updated the table, the lead, and added a note. It's ready to add the new data when the new census comes out in a few months. Now for the map, do you know where we can get a better one? Mattximus (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't think an updated map exists yet, and I don't really have the knowledge of what software Wikipedia uses to make these maps. Since a map specifically highlighting San Qintín Municipality existed on the Spanish Wiki page, I placed it on the English Wiki page for the municipality, so maybe we could add that in somewhere until somebody makes an updated map showing all the municipalities.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 16:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think it would be rather random to just throw that one image beside the full map, I made the first map so I could possibly make the second, I just have to look for a template. Maybe one will be made soon. Mattximus (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks again.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 16:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Camargo Municipality, Tamaulipas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Ciudad Camargo
- Nogales Municipality, Sonora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Magdalena Municipality
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:47, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
"Liberty Hangout" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liberty Hangout. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#Liberty Hangout until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 18:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Family guy Season 14 (Peternormal Activity & The New Adventures of Old Tom)
Why redirect those pages? There was nothing wrong with them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.170.187 (talk) 16:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Links to disambiguation page
Molandfreak, the guidleines for linking to a disambiguation page on are at WP:HOWTODAB. Leschnei (talk) 11:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2020 United States presidential election in Alabama, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Tartan357: Not sure why you had to use an exclusively vandalism-related tag for bringing this up on my talk page (my edits were 100% in good faith and I have no intention to edit war), but it's mathematically impossible for Jorgensen to get over 5% of the vote anywhere (except maybe Alaska). Does it really make sense to still have her in these navboxes?--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 07:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Molandfreak, it's not an "exclusively vandalism-related tag". You removed content without explaining why in an edit summary, which is exactly what the template is for. Using edit summaries is a best practice, especially for potentially controversial edits. I think it is potentially confusing to make major changes to the infoboxes (these are infoboxes, not navboxes) while votes are still being counted. She can also get 5% in AK, like you mentioned. We can easily wait until the final results are in to remove her from states in which she got less than 5%. ― Tartan357 Talk 07:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:VoicePlay
Hello, Molandfreak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "VoicePlay".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
List of First Edition Records releases
Hey Molandfreak. You added a tag to my new article, saying there were no inline citations. How in the hell does one use inline citations for a discography? The bulk of the data came from Discogs and Naxos, as noted in the references. But I used extensive google searches to find E-Bay auctions, and Amazon listings, and reviews to fill in gaps in the catalog. I can't cite those? I CREATED this page precisely because there was no definitive list of FE releases anywhere on the web (I looked). So who or what can I cite? Rcarlberg (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Rcarlberg: The external link list was fine, but I placed the tag because articles (even lists) normally have inline citations so that a reader can check where the information came from in a link directly by the information. If you put the citations in the top of the drop-down menus, I think that's also fine. But as I read the list, it wasn't immediately clear where you got the information related to the publication years or artists. An inline citation (or multiple) at the top of the drop-down menus would fix that.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Molandfreak: With all due respect, I think that fundamentally misunderstands the nature of a discography. Unlike articles full of facts or opinions, discographies are lists of releases that can be easily verified if and when the discs are available to verify. In a marketplace -- particularly a USED disc marketplace -- the availability of such discs is coming and going all the time, making a permanent citation impossible. I linked to the two sources that purport to be lists of the First Edition Records releases, though neither is definitive or organized in any way. The remaining gaps were (mostly) filled in with "marketplace" listings, which cannot be cited. There was no single source; otherwise I wouldn't have needed to collate the information myself. Rcarlberg (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Reminder about Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories
I see you have accepted several requests, but you forgotten to add {{afc-c}} to those requests. You may want to read Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories/Reviewing instructions. There is also a script available for handling requests quickly. Thanks. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 06:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Aseleste: Thanks, I'm new to reviewing and didn't know which template to use for hiding requests. I'll take a look at that script.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 06:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Your edit is not helpful. I'm a competent and longstanding editor on Kashmir- and India-related pages. I've written the article Kashmir and the FA India. It is hard enough for those of us who watch over these pages to keep the POV (of the various WP editors champing at the bit to add their Kashmir-related fantasies) out of the major Kashmir-related pages: Jammu and Kashmir (union territory), Ladakh, Azad Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan and Aksai Chin. (Do you see the uniform phrasing in the lead sentences on those pages? Well, that phrasing was hard-won, the result of an RFC supervised by an administrator and supported by half a dozen administrators. See here and here.) So, it doesn't help when people keep adding unencyclopedic or POV content to other new or existing pages. Kashmiris is a POV-fork. Please self-revert. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Important information
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)