User talk:Moisejp/Archive 15

Request for input on a featured article candidacy

Greetings, I have nominated Lake Estancia for a featured article nomination. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. The instructions for the review process are here. Thanks in advance for any comments. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jo-Jo Eumerus, sorry I missed this FAC. Glad to see the nomination was successful for you. Cheers! Moisejp (talk) 02:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gerda Arendt, thank you! Moisejp (talk) 02:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you today for I'm Goin' Down, introduced: "My first foray into FAC in 2.5 years, I brought this article about the Bruce Springsteen song to GA in 2016 and have expanded it in the last nine months, largely from Newspapers.com as well as some online books, etc."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gerda Arendt. :-) Moisejp (talk) 02:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

I know I was the one gone for a long time but it’s good to see a familiar face around here again. Hope you’ve been well. :) FrB.TG (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, welcome back to you too. :-) Moisejp (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded re welcome back Moise. Just a fleeting note but must catch up soon. Ceoil (talk) 19:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, thanks, Ceoil. I also look forward to catching up soon! Moisejp (talk) 01:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

as a catch up, my taste is mellowing with age, and am completely obsessed with this from 13:18 on; Jacko's bass lines melt my mind. Feel free, so I don't feel so lonely, so share other guilty pleasures. Ceoil (talk) 03:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ceoil, thanks for thinking of me when you're feeling lonely with your music! :-) I'm listening to Jaco right now. There are some bits I'm enjoying pretty well. I'm going to listen to it a little more before I fully comment on it. As for me, there's nothing I've been obsessed with lately, or any new cool new stuff I've discovered recently that's likely to blow you away. But if we're talking about guilty pleasures, I especially like Ed Sheeran's recent hit "Shivers" for one. :-) And here's [a well-known 70s/80s band] that I didn't get to listen to much as kid growing up when they were most popular, but I've recently rediscovered when I got an anthology by them that has lots of catchy songs on it. Here's a mellow and (for me) irresistible [less famous old tune] I recently discovered by another 70s/80s duo that I've always been a fan of. And here's [a song I heard often at a coffee shop] in my freewheeling single days when I taught English in Japan 20 years ago that I didn't know who it was, made a terrible-sounding recording of a bit of it (coming from the coffee shop speakers) on my camera, and spent the next two decades on a quest trying to identify it, which I finally did a number of months ago! Yeah, again, I'm not necessarily expecting any of this to be your cup of tea, but it's the best I could come up with on short notice. :-) Do feel free to share any more of your faves anytime at all. Moisejp (talk) 00:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All very interesting, thank you very much and am going through, and am finding little in your posts that I dont like - the Johnny Pearson track is lovely. Here is my current guilty pleasure, and liz's also, though its a few years dated. Best as always.[1] Ceoil (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way myself and Blz are talking about a collab on This Nation's Saving Grace, the greatest of all the post punk albums. You are obs most welcome to join, you know "a lot", though how much into the FALL, I'm not sure, although our taste is very similar otherwise. But it would be great and make me proud to see you there in any capacity. Talk later. Ceoil (talk) 04:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceoil! I'd never heard of Damien Rice, but I like that song very much, very cool. I'm glad you like the Johnny Pearson one. I know nothing about the Fall but would be thrilled to collaborate, I'm sure I can find ways to contribute regardless. :-) I see you've already made a ton of edits. I'll just let you know that how much I can contribute depends partly on how much of a hurry you are to see it reach fruition; in my present circumstances right now I can only dedicate a bit (or possibly medium small amount) of time to Wikipedia. But by all means I'd be happy to make lots of contributions slowly but surely if there are no big deadlines. Talk again soon! Moisejp (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ceoil and blz 2049, have started collecting sources here: User:Moisejp/sandbox14. Newspapers.com has 17 hits for the album from 1985, and several of these may be full album reviews. I'll start with these and then spread out from there. Cheers, Moisejp (talk) 05:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Welcome back and welcome aboard! FYI, that ping won't send me a notification anymore now that I've changed usernames, but, no worries, that's nbd—like, your expression of fondness for any of the work of Ed Sheeran is far more concerning. But I concur with Ceoil about the Johnny Pearson track tho, wow. Reminds me of the library music–style jamz from the original Sims soundtrack. And that's a lovely story, carrying a recording of a recording of such a wistful song two decades into the future to finally put a name to it :-).

Very glad to have you on the case! It's apt in a way too, despite your unfamiliarity with the wonderful and frightening world of the Fall, because I regard Mark E. Smith as the best contender for the title of "the English Dylan", or "the Punk Dylan", or "the Post-Modern Dylan" (to Bob's high modernism), take your pick. This one's as affecting/epic as "Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands" and as cryptic/biblical as, well, median Dylan, not to mention the oblique climax is possibly an allusion to a certain event in Dylan's life circa mid-'66. —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome aboard Mosie! You helped so much with Cut the Crap that I consider that a collab, but so great to do a page together - officially! Jerusalem is another good entry point. Ceoil (talk) 09:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blz 2049, Ceoil, thanks for the links! I'll do my darnedest to get at least a bit familiar with the Fall while working on this. It'll be good for my musical education and will hopefully help the article too! BLZ, yeah, I hear some similarities between the Pearson track and the Sims you linked. Good stuff. Cool, well, I just hope I'll be able to find enough time to contribute enough that I'll be considered a "bonafide collaborator"! :D Talk again soon, Moisejp (talk) 21:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Goin' Down scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 13 May 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 13, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your work on this article and congratulations on it being chosen as TFA. — AjaxSmack 19:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, AjaxSmack! Moisejp (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Springsteen?

Hey there friend! I was wondering if you're planning on doing any more Springsteen articles in the future? I recently acquired Guesdon and Margotin (using that to add personnel to song articles) and might consider going through his albums from Greetings to Tunnel. (The main one I wanna do is Darkness but if I'm at it might as well go in order). I was jw what your plans were, so maybe we could collaborate? Cheers. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 14:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi zmbro! Thank you for reaching out and for thinking of me. I understand your main interest is in collaborating on an album article, but could I ask off the bat whether you'd possibly have any interest in collaborating on a Springsteen song article instead? My reasons are as follows. In a nutshell it'd seem less ambitious and easier for me to wrap my head around tackling a song in my current situation. Basically I don't have really a lot of free time or extra mental bandwidth currently. But if it was a song article I could at least partly use the "I'm Goin' Down" article as a sort of a template to guide some of my planning and figure out less stuff from scratch. I think having that would also help to keep me more focused against the distractions of real life, and increase the chances I could stay on task during the collaboration. I'm not saying I'd necessarily aim to make the structure exactly the same, but just having the "I'm Goin' Down" article as somewhat of a model would be helpful. If it happened the song article we collaborated on was a Born in the U.S.A. tune, that'd be even more helpful because I could reuse a lot of the same sources and spend less time digging for info. (But even if it was a song from another album there are still some of my sources I could no doubt still use.) All of the above reasons, plus by its very nature an album tends to be a broader topic than a song, and more ambitious from that point of view as well, so that's another reason why I'd be more hesitant to tackle an album article in my current situation. If you really have your heart set on an album collaboration, I'd say the only one I could see myself possibly tackling right now would be Born in the U.S.A., again simply because I already have a lot of the background, etc. at my fingertips and fresh in my mind from having done the IGD article kind of recently. Also a disclaimer that overall I'm quite a bit more familiar with the Boss's 80s and early 90s period than his 70s stuff. Another disclaimer is that regardless of what we might decide, I'm going to be especially busy for the next month and a half, then will have some free time during December, then busy again around Christmas, but in the new year will have time again. However, even if we did start something now, I could still chip away at the article now a bit at a time. But if what I'm proposing about a song or about BITUSA is not what you're keen on, that's of course totally cool too. In that case I'd encourage you to work on Darkness or Greetings and maybe can collaborate another time instead. :-) Moisejp (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I finish wrapping up Duran's Seven and the Ragged Tiger I'd be more than happy to tackle a song (especially for starters). For BitUSA I'd personally go for any of the singles but my personal choices would be "Cover Me", "Dancing", or "Glory Days". But, given the title track's significance as one of the most misunderstood songs in rock music I think that would be good as well. Just lmk what you decide and we can get started. :-) – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 14:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, zmbro, either "Cover Me" or "Dancing" sound good to me. Neither was recorded among the May 1982 tracks, so I'm glad we wouldn't be belabouring the story already told in IGD about the tracks being recorded while he decided what to do with the Nebraska songs, and then eventually being temporarily shelved. Also as you may know, both have interesting backstories: "Cover" written for Donna Summer but Jon Landau decided it was too good to give away, and "Dancing" written after the album was otherwise completed but Landau urged Bruce to write one more song. I'm guessing there'll be more sources about "Dancing" as (likely) more has been written about it over the years. For that reason, I'd have a slight preference for "Cover Me" in that it might be less ambitious to scour the available sources, but really, I could go either way if you happen to prefer "Dancing". Yeah, both are appealing for different reasons. One other thing: I kind of have a medium strong preference for the Harvard style of citation, but if you have a strong preference not to use Harvard, I could be flexible. Just let me know. :-) Moisejp (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I bet "Cover" would be easier as well. I'd be good to start with that, and possibly "Dancing" further down the line. :-) – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 22:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS "New Moon on Monday" is my favourite DD song. Give it lots of love in the article! ;-) Moisejp (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi zmbro, I finally got to starting adding some content to "Cover Me". I hope to have a chance to edit a bit more in the next couple of weeks, and then as I mentioned I'll be unavailable for two or three weeks after Christmas. Above you didn't mention objecting to using the Harvard style, so if that's really OK, I'll likely begin by changing over some of the existing citations to Harvard. Cheers! Moisejp (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep go ahead and I'll follow suit! – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 17:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review question

Hello again. Apologies for this random message. I just have a quick question. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any insight on my current peer review for the Manos Arriba article? I am debating on bringing through the FAC process next month, but I would like to get as much feedback as possible to see if that is a viable option.

I plan on taking a long break after this particular project because I have been feeling burned out lately with Wikipedia. I hope you are doing well and staying safe out there. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aoba47! I hope you've been really well. I should have time to start looking at this next week, sometime after Monday. Talk soon! Moisejp (talk) 05:35, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response, and take as much time as you need. There is absolutely no rush with this one. If I decide to pursue a FAC with this article, I would do so in late December, and if it is not considered suitable for a FAC, I am just happy that I was able to expand and strengthen the article since I last worked on it. Aoba47 (talk) 05:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the double post, but I just wanted to let you know that I decided to archive the peer review due to lack of engagement and I did not want to take away any attention from newer peer reviews. I have put the article up for a FAC just to see what happens there. I just wanted to update you about it. Hope you are doing well! Aoba47 (talk) 17:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aoba47, sorry I kept thinking I was going to get to it soon, and then I knew I was going to get to it this weekend, and I meant to let you know a few times my review was imminent, but apologies I missed the PR. I'll start looking at your FAC tonight.

There's no need to apologize. We are all busy so I completely understand that. Thank you for the FAC review and I will be addressing everything in a few. I feel bad for archiving the peer review because I did not want to send a wrong impression to you about that. Aoba47 (talk) 17:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!
Have a great Christmas, and may 2023 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus! Cheers SchroCat (talk) 11:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holy moly, SchroCat you're back! I've missed you. This is a really nice Christmas surprise to see you back on here, and I look forward to hopefully crossing paths with you lots in the new year. Have wonderful holidays and all the best! Moisejp (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another year gone

		Best wishes for the holidays
		Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season, and here's hoping 2023 won't bring as much global trauma as 2020, the worse 2021[2] & fecking 2022! Ceoil (talk) 04:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ceoil! 2023 has gotta be good, I'm feeling positive about it. :-) Next year looking forward to jazzing up lots of content, lots of cool stories about musicians or other artsy types with you! Take it easy, and I'll be in touch again real soon. Moisejp (talk) 04:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan Moisej, and talk soon. Ceoil (talk) 04:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]