User talk:Moirsteve

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolf Mail

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wolf Mail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Steve Moir (talk) 03:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation at Wolf Mail

In your recent edit to Wolf Mail, you removed the copyright violation tag, but you did not substantially change the content of the article, meaning that the content was still a copyright violation. In the future, if you remove a copyright violation tag, you must also address the underlying violation, or your removal may be seen as vandalism. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further copyright violations at Wolf Mail

You reintroduced copyrighted material to Wolf Mail after the material had been removed. Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia, as this is a violation of Wikipedia guidelines. This includes copying whole swaths of material from the artist's posted biography at his management's website, as well as material posted on his MySpace page. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wolf Mail

An editor has nominated Wolf Mail, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Mail and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Wolf Mail by Tony Egan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf Mail by Tony Egan.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Your addition to Wolf Mail has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —SMALL JIM 15:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Wolf Mail - Live in Oss, NL - Oct 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf Mail - Live in Oss, NL - Oct 2012.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]