User talk:Mohsinnn4

Welcome!

Hello, Mohsinnn4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kab? Kyoon? Aur Kahan? did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film box office statements

Hi, this is Joyous!. I noticed that you've added box office results for many movies, but there is no source given for your statments. Where are you getting the information about whether a film was "an average success", "a hit", or "a semi-hit"? Joyous! Noise! 21:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Imtihaan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Tu Chor Main Sipahi. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tu Chor Main Sipahi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sone Ke Haath (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sone Ke Haath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 22:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohsinnn4! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 22:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I have redirected Sone Ke Haath to the page listing 1973 Hindi films. If you think it's a mistake and can improve the page, feel free to revert and expand. Best.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sone Ke Haath

Hello, Mohsinnn4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sone Ke Haath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Hum Hayn Aapkay Ghulam" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hum Hayn Aapkay Ghulam has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 28 § Hum Hayn Aapkay Ghulam until a consensus is reached. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Mwwv. An edit that you recently made to Sone Ke Haath seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you believe this movie is notable to have its own article, please expand the draft at Draft:Sone Ke Haath. Thank you. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 15:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account. JBW (talk) 19:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohsinnn4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I’ve created multiple account and I’ve seem to have gone against Wikipedia guidelines which I regret fully because it has been my passion to edit Wikipedia pages. Please forgive my mistakes because I just would like to edit Wikipedia topics I am passionate about to give myself satisfaction as well as ensure that no false information is spreaded. The reason of making multiple account is not because I intend to do harm to Wikipedia, I just had a big passion for Wikipedia but I now understand that it went very wrong. Please forgive my mistake so I’m able to start afresh with editing once again and I’m able to edit again. Please lift the ban and guide me towards editing Wikipedia the right way. I know and I understand fully what I have done and what I can do to rectify my mistake.Please lift the ban off my IP address as well as my account so I’m able to become a better writer for Wikipedia as well as improve on my writing skills. I’m sorry again :( Thank you. Mohsinnn4 (talk) 21:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please request unblock from your original account- but you should wait six months before you do so, as a demonstration of your ability to abide by community practices and procedures. If you are unable or unwilling to do that, we're all just wasting our time here. Forget about your IP address, as you have an account. Focus on your account. As you have found, attempting to edit via other accounts or your IP would be block evasion. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]