User talk:Mohitkapahi20

This is Mohitkapahi20's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Mohitkapahi20!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheehan Kapahi (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheehan Kapahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sheehan Kapahi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohitkapahi20! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.--CreecregofLife (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the conflict of interest in this . I couldn't understand . 110.226.136.248 (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you also Mohit? It's a conflict of interest because you are an involved party to the subject--CreecregofLife (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am Mohit . Conflict of interest with whom .???My son is a child actor and is 11 year old . I am trying to create wiki page for him . He is too small to create for himself 110.226.136.248 (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, you're doing it on his behalf. Wikipedia is not an autobiography reserve, it's an encyclopedia. Please read the COI policy linked in my initial message. And log into your account--CreecregofLife (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohitkapahi20: Please be aware that only notable topics are considered for inclusion, as Wikipedia defines notability. In the case of an actor, the individual must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for entertainers; and also if someone is currently alive, it must conform to Wikipedia's strict policy on biographies of living persons.

Readers must be able to verify that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable and independent published sources. Here is an example of a source that would meet both of these requirements: https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/sheehan-shines-on-idiot-box/

Interviews are considered primary sources; they can verify certain facts, but lack the independence to establish notability. Similarly sites with other user-generated content (such as social media sites, blogs, message boards and even the IMDb) are defined as self-published sources and therefore neither reliable nor independent. In addition, unpublished personal knowledge or experience (referred to as original research) is not allowed because it is unverifiable.

Finally, someone with a personal connection to a subject has an inherent conflict of interest. This makes it difficult for you to write from the required neutral point of view, use only information taken from reliable sources and avoid original research. We also tell editors that an article about you (or someone close to you) isn't necessarily a good thing. If such an article is accepted, you will have no right of ownership or control over its content. Other editors acting in good faith (which we always assume unless there is clear evidence to the contrary) can edit it at any time. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sheehan Kapahi

Hello, Mohitkapahi20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sheehan Kapahi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sheehan Kapahi

Hello, Mohitkapahi20. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sheehan Kapahi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]