User talk:Mohamed IT

This is Mohamed IT's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Degodia (Clan) (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Degodia (Clan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Degodia (Clan), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohamed IT! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Degodia (Clan) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Degodia (Clan). Thanks! Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you bro Mohamed IT (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Degodia (Clan) has been accepted

Degodia (Clan), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to know why is start class what is lacking my article so I will correct Mohamed IT (talk) 21:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Hb1290. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Degoodi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Hb1290 (talk) 00:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Degoodi. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The issue of "bare URLs" was not resolved; at least 5 references contain bare URLs. The WP:REFILL tool cannot process all reference citations; some citations must be completed manually. Thanks. Woodlot (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gardhere have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not create duplicate content forks and then direct articles to your preferred version. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hawiye. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What you edited to Hawiye page is wrong re edit to original last correct version Mohamed IT (talk) 22:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mohamed IT! Your additions to Degoodi have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I make first Degodia (Clan) page With many information I also added their sources it was approved but after months an administrator talks to me saying that there is a Degodia page already and you cant do another page with the same so You have to copy all your information to original Degoodi page so I did that but I also surprise what is the copyright please answer me quickly. Mohamed IT (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The text you added to this article has been copy/pasted from external sources, including some unique typographical errors. It was clearly not written in your own words. This is a copyright violation. It appears that you have also been using multiple accounts. Please review and acknowledge the disclaimer directly above, and list all the prior and current accounts you are using to edit Wikipedia articles. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only use two accounts (Mohamed IT) and this (Anoums) the texts I copied from trusted websites Anoums that talks about Degodia or Degoodi is it wrong, All Wikipedia pages information it copied from trusted sites but some are fake I didn't stole information I just cites or resource trusted websites Mohamed IT (talk) 23:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only use two accounts (Mohamed IT) and this (Anoums) the texts I copied from trusted websites that talks about Degodia or Degoodi is it wrong, All Wikipedia pages information it copied from trusted sites but some are fake I didn't stole information I just cites or resource trusted websites Mohamed IT (talk) 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mohamed IT, there are some serious competency concerns with respect to grammar, and you have yet to acknowledge the Wikipedia policies pertaining to copyright. If it is not possible for you to write in your own words in a competent manner, then please discuss your proposed edits on the respective article talk page, and wait until there is a consensus to proceed before implementing them. You may also wish to consider contributing to another Wikipedia in your native language, as there seems to be a communication issue here. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understood but how all my information is copyrighted just tell me that some can be say is copyright but all Mohamed IT (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok no problem I will contact Wikipedia and request copyright. Thanks Mohamed IT (talk) 00:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdirisak Ibrahim Adam “British” (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In some point of this draft were written like an advertisement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdirisak Ibrahim Adam “British” and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdirisak Ibrahim Adam “British”, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Abdirisak Ibrahim Adam “British”

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Abdirisak Ibrahim Adam “British”, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 01:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 02:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed IT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Bro I didn't edit any page fake or did something wrong why you block me please respond quiclyMohamed IT (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think you'd need to explain why you have so many accounts, including User:John Sikty and User:AnonymousQ100. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:24, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was using that accounts for re editing false edits that many other people make it was blocked because editing many pages even though I was correcting after that I created this new account for creating new pages and I didn't edit any page without resource Mohamed IT (talk) 11:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I told you everything I am waiting response quickly please. Mohamed IT (talk) 10:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One of your prior accounts, User:John Sikty, was blocked for vandalism and disruptive editing. Why did you fail to mention this when you were recently asked to disclose your other accounts? [1] In light of this, and due to extensive competency issues, vandalism, copyright violations, et cetera, this request is declined. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is vandalism but I was correcting the pages I knew the what is real on that pages but I didn't knew you need resources and cites for what you written I was new to Wikipedia at that but I created this new account for creating pages and editing with resources and cites and the copyright issue is I took many information without permission I didn't knew that you told me that I am going to contact the owners for permission I didn't do disruptive or vandalism for this account unblock bro Mohamed IT (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access has been revoked. If you wish to demonstrate that you are able to contribute in a constructive manner, please do so from your primary account. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]