User talk:Moglesby1999

Editing High School Football National Championship

Recently you took down a substantial, year's worth of edits without explanation. This is a community site, and, based on previous discussion with @Theduder3210 this is not the first time this issue has been raised.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at High School Football National Championship, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Elsliderino (talk) 19:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Pbritti. An edit that you recently made seemed disruptive and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have persistently and exclusively edited to describe a season ranking of a high school football team. In the process, you've uploaded at least one image that violated copyright. I encourage you to read these two pages: What Wikipedia is not (particularly this section) and Single-purpose accounts. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Pbritti (talk) 01:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have posted and removed the correct 1978 football ranking. Houston Stratford was NOT co champion in 1978. The correct ranking was posted "twice" and you removed it twice. It is you that are posting disruptions. This is not the first time this has happened. This correct ranking will continue to post. Again, Annandale was the sole #1 in high school football in 1978. Stop your disruptive and false editing. What is your affiliation to Stratford High School or Annandale? Again, stop posting these false updates. Moglesby1999 (talk) 01:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look: this was a copyright violation. I could not care less what the 1978 football ranking of a high school were, but I recognize disruptive editing when I see it. You've edit-warred, uploaded copyrighted material, and claimed to have only reinserted something twice despite your contributions showing that you've reinserted your preferred edits over the objections of other editors for two years. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it. You called these "accurate" posts / edits "disruptive editing" with little to no support for your own changes other than your "own" narrative. Your motives were in no way "copyright" protection. They were specific to these posts, which reflected accurate and correct information as I have stated and as can be easily accessed from other sources.

If you are so concerned with copyright on Wiki, I suggest you embark upon policing the entirety of Wiki to find REAL copyright violations and/or actual inaccurate posts. It will take you quite some time and take you away from those posting accurate information and details which actually help Wiki.

No, your attacks were broadly aimed at these posts. I would suggest, in future, you not harass those of us posting accurate information on this site. The more accurate and truthful this site is in what it reflects, the better it is for everyone.

You did not take the time to contact me or fact check anything. Rather, you simply proceeded to attack all such editing posts and this account, specifically. These are the facts. Don't spin it to some "copyright" crusader narrative. You incorrectly called this account "disruptive editing." Period. Full stop.

Be accurate about how this started and it was not in any way related to "copyright." Your broad attack and removal was very specific and targeted against the posting of accurate and true information related to this particular topic.

That said, thank you for your "tips" on editing. I will take them under advisement. Have a nice holiday. Moglesby1999 (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One other thing, we will continue to update and post. Deal with it. You are not helping this page by taking down accurate information. I would suggest YOU take a break from this for a while. Your editing is "disruptive" and "combative." Your continued rants are not helping your cause to remove accurate posts from this site.

Again, stop your disruptive editing and stop harassing editors on this site. The "other" editors that you refer to are quite likely you under another name or affiliates of you. Referring to "them" in no way helps your case.

Finally, you seem to be quite overly obsessed with our posts. Now, we will review your posts and changes for accuracy and copyright violations and I am quite sure we will find a multitude of policy violations if no similar egregious behavior on this site.

Again, I suggest you move on and enjoy the holidays. Leave truth alone. Finally, I would suggest that you review your posts on this site, lest there be any that might be questionable or actionable. My guess, your posts are a wealth of policy violations and harassment of other editors. Moglesby1999 (talk) 20:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who is we? ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"We," are those who are interested in truthful information and "free" speech on Wiki. You, clearly would not know about this. Here is a thought, get out of your parent's basement. Get some fresh air. Being a "free" editor and destroyer of truth and accuracy is not a career.

That said, it has been an interesting experience to meet a Wiki-Fascist. I was unaware that they existed until now. Quite said indeed.

Finally, remember - Wiki is an "open" forum not the exclusive dwelling place for those who feel an ownership right thereto.

I have a feeling this will be a long slog for you. Stop destroying truth and accuracy. Copyright that. And, please stop being so "combative" Pbritti.

Moglesby1999 (talk) 04:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and go ahead and block this account if you wish. We welcome it. We have plenty of IPS to originate new accounts from and keep coming at this site with accuracy and truth. I mean, really, you and your "Explicit" editor ought to be more creative with your fascist threats.

So, go ahead, get your friend "explicit" to block the account. And get ready to block more and more starting on Christmas Day.

IP amateurs should not be given such power to clumsily harass users that are trying to make a difference. But, hey, go for it Pbritti and Explicit.

Merry Christmas!! 😂 Moglesby1999 (talk) 04:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's all awful mean to say. I'm not sure why ypu'd be so cruel, especially since i agree with you on there only being one high school declared the 1978 national champion. Generally, comments like that above can get you blocked. But I want you to have the opportunity to retract them. Please do so. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moglesby1999, you need to drop your battleground mentality. The pattern of your behavior over the past two years has been disruptive. Pbritti is correct that your uploads have been copyright violations. I have suggested how to cite offline sources on my talk page. Should you continue, you may be blocked for your disruptive editing. ✗plicit

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and threats to continue said behavior.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ✗plicit 23:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block it permanently dummy. Did you not get my last message? Your battleground mentality comments are ridiculous. Read Pbritti's stream - fascist. Or did you write it? As you seem to be his alter ego and certainly have been the one opening with threats and a "battleground" mentality. You and Pbritti started this, specifically targeting this account.

Spare the community the faux objectivity and concern for maintaining order on Wiki. That is nonsense and YOU know it.

Here is the thing, people like you ARE the problem. Pbritti and YOU originated this. But, that is not important. What is important to you and your HS football obsessed minion is control and elimination of dissent and contributions on this platform. You are a cancer that represents a much broader threat to free speech and the origins of Wiki, which, historically, provided a platform for a broad array of people the opportunity to contribute. You are the antithesis of that.

You and people like you is one of the reasons Wikipedia has gotten such bad press lately.

Harassing editors under the guise of "copyright" violations is a joke. If not that, it would be something else; And you know it.

Let's not kid ourselves. You, Xplicit, are the problem. You should permanently delete YOUR account. That would provide a great service to all of us and CERTAINLY Wikipedia.

On a side note, what "normal" person would use such a moniker? However, your page description says it all.

Oh, and don't worry, we are going to use our other accounts and IPs to respond and make a conscious effort to have you removed as an editor to the extent you choose to NOT delete your account.

Clearly you have done this before and are a danger to the open platform that is Wiki. Fascism and suppression of free ideas and contributions have no place on Wikipedia - Xplicit & Pbritti (I still cannot get over your handle Xplicit - I mean really - what are you hiding from?).

Happy holidays!

Moglesby1999 (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your reaction here is totally unhinged. Both an extended user and admin with almost 300k edits between them have determined that what you posted had copyright issues. It is their responsibility to do so. They have also dispassionately cited evidence where your past behavior is inconsistent with Wikipedia’s guidelines (only to be proven accurate on display here). This isn’t Twitter. Certain standards must be met.

These responses of yours are completely unreasonable. Instead of acting like a proper member of the community and simply working to come to a constructive solution in line with Wikipedia standards, you decided to resort to conspiratorial thinking, conflating issues, ad-hominem attacks, appeal to force, appeal to motive, appeal to ridicule, red herring, straw man and tu quoque arguments, insinuation, hyperbole, appeal to tradition, hasty generalization, psychological projection, false dilemma, dismissiveness, assumption of moral high ground, appeal to pity, appeal to ignorance, appeal to emotion, and appeal to popularity. What is jaw-dropping is that this entire invective stems from a very simple single instance use of a source.

@Pbritti and @Explicit- approach and conclusion here are 100% optimal in blocking a user like this. Thank you, admins, for making Wikipedia a better place. This is a difficult thing to do in these times and your efforts are greatly appreciated! Elsliderino (talk) 19:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you are? Oh yes, the first person who complained about the accurate corrections made to the rankings. Oh, and put down the Grammerly for a second and try and think original thoughts. And please stop YOUR unhinged Twitter like rants. I mean read your posting. Laughable.

Go back to your parent's basement and stay off the computer for a bit. It will be therapeutic…or, perhaps, not.

Happy holidays….guy from 2 years ago who posted the original incorrect information in the first place that has since been corrected.

I mean really….dude…pathetic is an understatement. But look, you are talking to a deleted account - if I need to reach you, we will contact you from one of our others.

A word of advice, don't message deleted accounts…it's kind of sad. And don't forget, get out and get some sunshine.

Happy holidays.

Moglesby1999 (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and congrats on the "1" edit since inception. Ghost account much? We have those too. Pathetic. Moglesby1999 (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How bout those rolling and mobile proxies @Moglesby1999??😎. We will see you back soon! 🤫 Explicit666 (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]