User talk:Mochatbh

November 2023

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't add school rivals unless they are significant enough that independent reliable sources discuss the rivalry Meters (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Hi Mochatbh! Thank you for your edits to Porfirionism. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Porfiriato into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 05:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Porfirionism

Hello, Mochatbh,

Thank you for creating Porfirionism.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I get exactly zero uses of this term or its Spanish equivalent in a Google search. Does it actually exist?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mochatbh! Your additions to Porfirionism have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hi Mochatbh, I noticed you replaced the "none" keyword with short descriptions on several pages (like History of Canada). These pages already have straightforward titles, so a short description is not needed, especially ones like yours that repeat information in the title. Please see Wikipedia:Short description for more information. Liu1126 (talk) 21:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imperial Beach Eagle & Times for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imperial Beach Eagle & Times is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Beach Eagle & Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 04:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mochatbh. Thank you for your work on CAFFENIO. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It's a start. More reference are available; I added one.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]