Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Barcelona Airport, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Barcelona Airport a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Barcelona Airport. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Barcelona Airport a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --AdmrBoltz19:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why have you forced line breaks in the Barcelona Meto line templates? They may look OK on your usual screen setup, but try reducing the size a little and you will see that the lines break at awkward places, forcing four lines. Sw2nd (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have ranamed "Trambesòs" templates to "Barcelona Tram" and expanded them so as to include Trambaix and any other tram lines you want. There is no need for a segregated series of templates since the same definitions will suit all lines. Sw2nd (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, thanks, but I just wanted to "repair" this because what you call "Barcelona Tram" does not exist. There are only four terms which are correct when you're refering to some kind of tram system in Barcelona: Trambaix, Trambesòs, Tramvia Blau and TRAM, which is the operator of Trambaix and Trambesòs. Trambaix and Trambesòs are very similar and you can even think they are part of the same system, but that's not true, and that's just because they are operated by the same company. Tramvia Blau is a vintage tram operated by Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona (TMB) and it's not part of any system, even is not part of the ATM integrated network. Therefore I thought about renaming the template called "Barcelona Tram" as "Transport in Barcelona" and remove other templates such as {{Railway stations in Barcelona}} or {{Barcelona Metro line navbox}} and include all of them into this new template, similar to {{Transport in London}} template. Mllturro (talk) 19:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I did not make this clear. I am referring to Category:Barcelona Tram succession templates (formerly Trambesòs) and not to {{Barcelona Tram}}. The same generic succession system can be used for every tram line and operator in Barcelona. There is no need to have a duplication of the information in separate templates for different operators. This one is now expandable rather than being restricted. The stations will all have the same naming convention. Additional lines and matching color definition can simply be added to those templates. Then use {{S-rail|title=OPERATOR}} and {{S-line|system=Barcelona Tram|line=Lx}}. Everything is then simply a tram line in Barcelona. Any tram line. Would you prefer to use lower case "t" as in "Barcelona tram" rather than "Barcelona Tram" for these? Oh, and I think you idea of one navbox for "Transport in Barcelona" is a viable one. Sw2nd (talk) 21:55, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's okay with "T". I would prefer two separate systems, but it's okay :-) About the navbox for "Transport in Barcelona", I think before starting the template some articles should be created or improved such as Buses in Barcelona (for the one I'm collecting some information), all articles about highways and ringroads around Barcelona as well as the improvement of all Barcelona Metro articles including all its lines and a major reformation of Rodalies de Catalunya article so that Rodalies Barcelona should be removed (because no longer exists) and be replaced by Rodalies de Catalunya. Mllturro (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I realized that you modified the template {{Barcelona Metro lines}} too. Barcelona Metro logo used by TMB () is only used at the entrances of Barcelona Metro stations operated by TMB in order to indentify them, and the same goes for Ferrocarrils de la Generalitat de Catalunya (FGC). The logos of all Barcelona Metro lines (like all commuter rail lines around the city and other transport systems) are decided by ATM in cooperation with the local governments and do not include those private logos used at stations by private companies such as TMB or FGC. So please, could you remove your changes on the corresponding template? Thanks :-) Mllturro (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Like this? That is exactly how I changed the Template:Barcelona Metro lines. The logo is shown for TMB lines as the photograph shows. Similarly represents FGC lines, using the current logo being shown outside the station entrances. What is wrong with that and what would you use to distinguish the operator? Sw2nd (talk) 12:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The logo to identify Barcelona Metro stations used by TMB can be also included on the stations' signs, but they're not in use on official public transportation maps by ATM at all, which is the one who decides how lines are numbered and colored. In fact, if it was this way all other lines operated by the same operators (FGC and TMB) or others (Renfe, Tusgal,...) should include the logo of the operator next to the logo of the line, and that does not happen. Another reason would be its bad-looking. Many other famous systems around the world do not include the logo of the operator such as the London Underground or the New York City Subway. There's no need to distinguish the operator, if it's necessary it can be added on the corresponding article and they can find all the information about the operator of the line and the trains in the line's article. It's like all lines have to follow a common design, as one of the goals that motivated the creation of ATM. Mllturro (talk) 19:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mmmh.. Are you kidding me? I worked my butt off. LOL And this is not the official map, this one is the map used only by TMB. The official map by ATM does not use the logo (), it only uses the official logo of TMB ([1]) to report which operator operate some specific lines. Official map by ATM (full integrated network): [2] Central integrated network (the most used at Barcelona Metro stations operated by TMB): [3]Mllturro (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ronda del Litoral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bypass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm notifying you about this as you are one of the main contributors to the article. Currently there is consensus to post a blurb about 2012 Catalan independence demonstration in the WP:ITN section of the main page, however due to lack of references in some sections of the article, it is still not posted. If you and other editors can add references to those section, it should be posted to main page in no time.
Yes, sure. I just added some information, but didn't have enough time to include all references. I collected some other references in Catakan and Spanish, so there will be a complete list of references ;-) Mllturro (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 06:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barcelona Sants railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Euromed and Estrella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rodalies de Catalunya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montblanc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trambesòs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sant Martí. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aeroport (Rodalies de Catalunya), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages El Periódico and Ministry of Public Works and Transport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Llobregat–Anoia Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single track. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gornal (Llobregat–Anoia Line), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gornal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited R1–RG1 (Rodalies de Catalunya), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfer station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
{{help me}}
What can I do to delete myself as a good article reviewer?
I accidentally applied to be a good article reviewer for R1–RG1 (Rodalies de Catalunya), for which I'm not allowed because I am the article's main author. After the unintended application, a bot edited the article's talk page and mine as well. I tried deleting the edits by the bot, but they reappeared. What can I do to definitely delete myself as a good article reviewer?
I think the trigger for Legobot to act was the mistakenly created review page, so I've deleted it and Legobot will now I hope remove the under review status at GAC and the article's talk page GA template status. It never acts immediately so we'll have to wait and see. Repost the helpme and explain my compounding error if this doesn't work.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Rodalies de Catalunya stations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alp and Seva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited R3 (Rodalies de Catalunya), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alp and Seva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ernest Lluch station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfer station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I was reading your R1/RG1 and R2 articles, as they are nominated for GA, with an eye to doing their review. I do think, however, that before I would attempt that task, I would ask you to do 2 things:
Both articles would REALLY benefit from a detailed route map at the bottom of the Infobox.
Hey there, I saw your note on the other GA that failed due to inactivity. But this one on R1-RG1 is still open since you've made so many improvements and there is only a small amount of work left, I would hate to fail it now. So I saw that you're busy, but if you could look at the two questions on the sources I think that'll be all that's needed to finalize the review. MPJ-US21:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article R2 (Rodalies de Catalunya) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:PortAventura Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Just randomly selected this article. One part contradicts itself. It essentially says the underground station opened in 1895, replacing the much older station building dating back to 1912. Err what? Difficultly north (talk) Simply south alt.09:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I have been editing Wikipedia for almost 5 years, and I am not able to edit now because "the IP address that I am currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider". But nothing has changed regarding my Internet configuration–I do not understand.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; you are not blocked directly, so we need your IP address and, ideally, your exact block message in order to find the block which is affecting you. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
unblock|1=I have been blocked for reasons I do not understand. I have been told to say my IP address (151.80.113.194) in a previous unblock message, but I have received NO message reagarding my current block. I have been editing Wikipedia for 5 years, and that had never happened to me before. Please someone unblock me.
Please understand that the block is absolutely not targeted at you. Instead, it is targeted at the rampant abuse which comes from your ISP, OVH. I can speak personally to attest that OVH is often the source of the vast majority of my incoming spam, and their server admins are unresponsive to complaints. Again, this block is not targeted at you and indeed, it's quite likely you were using a different ISP when this particular block was placed. Now, looking at the IP address you have provided, your ISP claims this is only given out to their hosted servers, not to regular end-users. Specifically, OVH is claiming that you are connecting from a dedicated server. Are you perhaps using a VPN or some such? Or are you simply trying to connect from your home computer and don't understand what the heck I'm talking about, with dedicated servers and VPNs and suchlike? This will help us determine whether or not OVH has misconfigured their network. --Yamla (talk) 14:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two days ago I installed a VPN client (I had never used one before), but never activated it. When I first saw I was blocked this morning I suspected of the VPN and unistalled it, but things remain the same way. I also restarted my computer and DSL modem afterwards. I'm not into computing, and thus I don't know very well how these things work. Thanks for your assistance. Mllturro (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the solution to this is Wikipedia:IP block exemption. To quote from that page " The right is given exceptionally and only for good reasons, and may be removed if concerns arise or when it is no longer needed. To request an IP address block exemption, copy this template to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock| reason=Requesting an IP address block exemption, because (your reason here). ~~~~}}. (I personally would take what you've written above as an implicit IP block exemption request already, but not being a technical type I think it would be wise to let someone else handle this.) Hope this works out. (Off for bicycle ride on this lovely winter afternoon - will check when I get back). --Shirt58 (talk) 04:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting an IP address block exemption, because I do not understand the reasons for which I am currently blocked. I have been on Wikipedia for almost 5 years, and that had never happened to me before. I thought this might be due to a VPN client I installed three days ago, which I later uninstalled and restarted everything, but I remain blocked. My IP address is 151.80.113.194. I have received no messages regarding my block.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lleida–La Pobla Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noguera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Yes, you're right, I was confusing it with La Sagrera-Meridiana. What with all the delays, plus another user's edits, it seems I thoroughly confused myself about the details of the project.
Hello, Mllturro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article R2 (Rodalies de Catalunya) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. I just noticed that the bot did not paste this message onto your talk page automatically, so realised you might not have spotted the review was in progress. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an accidents and incidents section. I noticed you've nominated the article for GA status. IMvHO, the line could do with a rail diagram; there is a good one at es:Línea R2. Are you able to draw diagrams such as this? I can, but will need assistance with translation if you are unable to do these diagrams. Mjroots (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Mllturro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Mllturro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Mllturro, I'm working on some routine cleanup and see you have not made use of the ip block exemption flag on your account for over a year. This will be removed in about a week, unless you reply below that you still have a need for this flag. This will have no impact on your ability to read Wikipedia. Best regards, — xaosfluxTalk12:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. As your account has been inactive for a year and there was no reply above, this flag has been removed. This will have no impact on general editing, however if you are trying to edit from certain blocked IP addresses you may need to move to another address or request a new exemption. Best regards, — xaosfluxTalk20:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Barcelona Airport, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Alaris lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
) is only used at the entrances of Barcelona Metro stations operated by TMB in order to indentify them, and the same goes for Ferrocarrils de la Generalitat de Catalunya (FGC). The logos of all Barcelona Metro lines (like all commuter rail lines around the city and other transport systems) are decided by ATM in cooperation with the local governments and do not include those private logos used at stations by private companies such as TMB or FGC. So please, could you remove your changes on the corresponding template? Thanks :-) Mllturro (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
is shown for TMB lines as the photograph shows. Similarly 
represents FGC lines, using the current logo being shown outside the station entrances. What is wrong with that and what would you use to distinguish the operator? Sw2nd (talk) 12:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Whatever makes you happy. Sw2nd (talk) 23:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](http://www.mafex.es/fotos/links_logo/tmb%20logo.jpg){kind=link}
Template:Citation accessible stations FGC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mllturro -- Mllturro (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
; see Talk:Airport T1 (Barcelona Metro) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 12:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:R1–RG1 (Rodalies de Catalunya) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
; see Talk:R1–RG1 (Rodalies de Catalunya) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 14:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
