User talk:Alexandrecomas

Proposed deletion of Woodlin Elementary School

The article Woodlin Elementary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JGHowes ^talk 20:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Alexandrecomas! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Maryland

It was recently suggested that WikiProject Maryland might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. I have started a discussion on the projects talk page soliciting the opinions of the members of the project if this project would be interested in being supported by WikiProject United States. Please feel free to comment on your opinions about this suggestion. --Kumioko (talk) 03:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

contribucions

veig que ajudes a expandir la cultura catalana per aquesta viquipèdia, et recomanaria que agafessis els articles de qualitat que aquí no tenen, ja que són una bona mostra del que podem fer. Els topònims són també un camp on fer molta feina, gràcies! (barcelona at ca-wiki)--217.125.235.235 (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey, thanks for edits on La Seu! I'm not 100% convinced by Saragossa in modern usage, but see Talk:Battle of Saragossa which I just restored. Are you by any chance interested in working on a Spanish MOS? See Talk:Spanish orthography/Talk:Spanish naming customs. Thanks again. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rivalry with Northwood

I attend Einstein and are rival is Northwood and a small one with Wheaton,it is a fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Templeonu (talk • contribs) 00:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan Way

Hi, Alexandrecomas! Thanks fot improving first few sections to a more legible English. Would you like to continue reviewing all the article? Furthermore, it would be fantastic to translate the others sections of the article of Catalan Wikipedia to English. Ànims! --Davidpar (talk) 07:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

El cant dels ocells (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Thrush, Canary, Blackbird and Lullabye

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serra de Moixeró, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Black pine, Segre and Watershed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan culture challenge

I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Cueva de Montserrat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland revert

I thought about leaving the statement,and I'll leave it...hopefully a U Maryland editor will remember to downgrade if ACC schools surpass their record now that MD is in the Big 10. I thought it was easier to take it out.....Pvmoutside (talk) 13:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland Rivalry

Hi Alexandrecomas,

We seem to have conflicts on the topic of Penn State and Maryland being rivals so I figured that I would start a user talk. At this point, I feel like it isn't a rivalry yet and most if not all Penn Staters agree that Maryland isn't our rival, myself included. In fact, the only truly hardcore rivalry we have is with the University of Pittsburgh. At this point, I feel like it would be more appropriate to portray it as more of a speculative thing like the whole Rutgers situation rather than coming out and just blatantly saying that it is a rivalry. You discuss talking about things from a neutral point of view but the fact of the matter is that it's Maryland's opinion that Penn State is their rival and it's Penn State's opinion that Maryland is not so, as I mentioned, if we want to keep it truly neutral and just keep the page as factual as possible, we should hold off on listing Penn State under the "Rivals" section under the infobox and instead explore the possibility of creating a subheading in the actual article that says "Possible Rivalry With Penn State" until such a time that it develops into an actual rivalry if that happens. I'm not saying that it isn't a possibility, but at this point it is not a rivalry. Rivalries are founded upon respect (yes, there is the hate factor there) but I feel like Penn State doesn't really respect Maryland given the fact that the overall record between the two teams is... 35-2-1 I believe? Right now it seems more like a situation where it is just two teams that play each other frequently. If Maryland can show that it can compete and win more than just 2 games in a series, it may develop into an actual rivalry though, I'm not denying that. Maryland is a good school academically and athletically and everybody would agree that Maryland is a more fitting rival than Rutgers. But we need to let a rivalry actually develop if there is one. All we've been seeing is the Maryland team being disrespectful to PSU on our home turf and Maryland's coach stating that Penn State is his biggest rival while James Franklin said he didn't view it as such. It needs to go both ways before it can be considered such and it needs time to actually develop.

If you disagree with this at all or don't agree with my suggestions regarding the article, feel free to respond to this and I will discuss it further with you. Or if I what I wrote was confusing and incoherent, feel free to indicate that as well in your response and I will try to expand upon what I'm trying to say. I look forward to hearing back from you.

Sources discussing the "rivalry" (if it does indeed exist at this point):

http://www.eveningsun.com/sports/ci_28561897/commentary-penn-state-vs-maryland-matchup-is-no

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/terrapins-insider/wp/2015/07/31/james-franklin-penn-state-players-brush-off-potential-rivalry-with-maryland/

Keep in mind that you will also be able to find articles that are biased towards Maryland's point of view on the situation which proves that the whole rivalry thing is just a matter of opinion at this point and not an actual fact of the matter...yet. It could happen but it isn't a rivalry yet. As I mentioned before, James Franklin and the PSU football team balked at the fact that people are trying to call Maryland a rivalry. If only one side views it as such, it isn't quite there yet. 75.97.115.25 (talk) 09:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Valencian Community. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sagrera railway station

You haven't even read through the article, have you? Your edits on this artcicle (Sagrera railway station) because of your claims that line 1 of the Barcelona Metro serves the station are totally nonsense. The station in question is still under construction and does NOT appear on the TMB metro map (it does on the ATM map as "Sagrera | TAV", together with the rest of line 9 stations under construction or planned). The future Sagrera station will be served by lines 4 and 9/10 of the Barcelona Metro, but not line 1 (a little amount of Internet research on the topic will be enough to prove that). I guess you are confusing it with La Sagrera-Meridiana station (simply known as "La Sagrera" for TMB), and which is served by lines 1, 5 and 9/10 of the Barcelona Metro. Please do not keep on reversing my edits. Thank you. Mllturro (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alexandrecomas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alexandrecomas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alexandrecomas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alexandrecomas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sherwood Syndrome

Hello, Alexandrecomas,

Thank you for creating Sherwood Syndrome.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the Sherwood Syndrome. Note that it is currently an "Orphan" meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See WP:DE-ORPHAN for pointers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Payés (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rita Payés and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm a German fan of Sant Andreu Jazz Band and I noticed that you submitted draft:Rita Payés. This submission has been declined recently, shortly after I joined your effort :(

What are you gonna do?
How can we work together on a second attempt?

Cheers! Alossola (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alexandrecomas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]